City of Columbus City Council · 2026-04-20

Transcript

Columbus City Council Meeting (4/20/26)

5883 segments

Regular meeting number 19 will now come

to order. Please stand for the playing

of the national anthem.

This evening we're going to do something

a little different. We have a live

version of the national anthem that will

be sang by Rose and Ketche. Rose,

welcome.

Oh, say

can you see

by the dawn

early

light,

what so proudly

we held

at the twilight

last gleaming

who sprouts stripes

and bright stars

through the perilous

fight.

Or the ramparts

we watched

were soently

streaming.

And the rockets

red glare.

The bombs bursting

in

gave proof

through the night.

That our flag

was still there.

Oh, say

does that star

spangled

that

yet

way

or the land

of the free

and the Home

of the

bra.

I hope you are free every Monday at 5:00

pm. Now going forward.

>> A thank you.

>> Council member Wise, would you lead us

in the pledge? Pledge allegiance to the

flag of the United States of America and

to the republic for which it stands, one

nation under God, indivisible, with

liberty and justice for all.

>> This evening I am so grateful to have uh

one of my dear friends, Rabbi Alex

Braver from Congregation's Terth, Israel

here to lead us in prayer. Rabbi,

welcome back to council.

Thank you.

In my tradition, in the Jewish

tradition, we hope and pray that the

work of our lawmakers and our leaders is

in furtherance of tedek, which means

justice in Hebrew. In Hebrew, tedek can

mean many things. Sedaka, for example,

from the same root commonly means

charity, whether that's giving spare

change or millions of dollars. And it

means that we give not only because we

are moved to or because it's a nice

thing but because it is sedc. It is an

obligation and part of what makes for a

just and righteous society.

Justice is also something that we are

commanded to pursue as in the book of

Deuteronomy which says turd justice

justice shall you pursue. It is

emphatic.

We must actively pursue it and seek it

out. not just hope that we stumble onto

it. It can feel like justice is always a

few steps ahead of us. And if we're not

sprinting after it, and if we're not

constantly in pursuit of it, and if it's

not our relentless focus, then it will

elude us.

At the same time, justice is also

something

that flows from God, something whose

progress is inevitable. It is God's

vision for our world. A vision that we

believe will eventually come to pass no

matter what obstacles stand in its way.

As the prophet almost declared in a

verse that is famously quoted by Dr.

King,

let justice well up like water and

righteousness like a mighty stream.

Rabbi Ibraham Joshua Hesshel who marched

with Dr. King and Selma spoke about this

same verse saying righteousness is not a

trickle. It is God's power in the world,

a torrent, an impetuous drive full of

grandeur and majesty.

And so we pray

Ovid Mishbat. Blessed is the source of

blessing and blessed is the one who

loves righteousness and justice.

May you bless this gathering with your

sense of tedic of righteousness and

justice.

Help those gathered here not just to

seek out justice, but to pursue it and

to chase after it and to not let it slip

away as it so often does. And at the

same time, bless all those gathered here

with the vision and the faith to see

that God's justice is also a mighty

stream and an inevitable force that will

with time sweep away all obstacles.

Give those gathered here the strength to

chase justice with all their strength

and with all their heart and all their

might. and to know that in the end with

your help and with our efforts justice

will always well up as a torrent of

grandeur and majesty. May it be God's

will. Amen.

>> And thank you so much Rabbi.

Clerk, please call the role.

>> Bank Rosa de Podia de Akawa Dorn Green

Remy Ross Vice President Harden. Any

person who takes any action to obstruct

or interfere with the conduct of

tonight's meeting may be charged with

disturbing a lawful meeting pursuant to

Columbus City Code 2317.12.

Any person who enters those areas of

city council chambers reserved for city

officials or invited guests may be

charged with criminal trespass pursuant

to Columbus City Code 2311.21.

>> Can I get a motion to dispense with the

reading of the journal?

>> Cler please call the role. Banks Debor

Rossa de Podia de Akaw Dors Green Remy

Ross Weiss President Harden

>> are there any additions or corrections

to the journal I hear none the journal

is approved this week's communications

received by the city clerk's office are

listed on the agenda and will be

published in the city bulletin are there

any other messages communicated

>> not at this time

>> thank you madame clerk we'll go around

the dis with uh updates and resolutions

by my colleague starting with council

banks

>> uh thank you uh president Harden I do

have uh just one announcement this

evening just as a reminder on Wednesday

April April 29th, I will be holding a

hearing to unveil and discuss the

steering committee's recommendations on

the establishment of the city's first

participatory budgeting pilot. Uh I am

uh looking forward to sharing all the

progress made on this initiative to date

and how residents can engage in this

process moving forward. All speakers

wishing to speak during the hearing in

person must email uh Jonathan Brown in

my office at jb browncolus.gov by 10:00

a.m. the day of the hearing with the

subject line participatory budgeting

hearing. Written testimony must also be

received by 10:00 a.m. on the day of the

hearing and emailed to Jonathan Brown

again at jbbrc columbus.gov. Each

speaker will be limited to remarks

lasting no longer than 3 minutes and as

of course will be streamed on all of our

uh channels uh for folks as well. Really

proud of the work uh that we've done so

far around participatory budgeting. This

has been a residentled effort um behind

the scenes and uh the committee has done

so much work. So we will be revealing

that guide book on how it will help

shape and guide us through this

participatory budgeting process as we

move through the year. So again looking

forward to having that discussion on

Wednesday, April 29th. Uh again uh

that's all I have. Council President,

thank you.

>> Thank you sir. Council member Rosadia.

>> Thank you council president. First of

all good evening everyone. It's so good

to see this council chamber full. How

many folks is this your first time in

council chambers?

Amazing. Democracy is a beautiful thing.

I hope it's not your last and I hope you

continue to come back for the things

that you care about. So, uh, this week

is traffic safety awareness week and I

think we have a little show and tell of

a flyer maybe perhaps. Yes. So, uh,

traffic safety week uh, we partner with

Columbus City Schools and Vision Zero.

Vision Zero is the idea that one day we

will have zero fatalities or serious

injuries due to crashes on our roadways.

This week, we're engaging students and

staff in conversations about safe ways

to travel to and from school. Throughout

the week, students will participate in a

variety of activities and programs

focused on pedestrian safety, bicycle

safety, and traffic awareness. So this

morning we kicked off uh traffic safety

week at Hiltonia Middle School where we

put in a flashing beacon on West Mound

Street. This was part of a larger um

traffic uh improvement project along

West Mound Street where we went from

four lanes to three lanes. We added a

turn lane, some other things to curb uh

speeding and other things along um West

Mound Street. So it was amazing to start

off our week with um students at

Hiltonia. Um secondly, this week is also

National Work Zone Awareness Week. And

really, uh this is just a reminder that

there's lots of construction happening

along our roadways. I know it's

frustrating for us, but it's our friends

and our neighbors who are working on

those roadways. So, paying attention,

locking in when you're driving to ensure

that as folks are on the roads that

we're thinking about their safety as

well. There have been opport or there

have been unfortunate incidences where

some of our folks have been hit by cars

or have been injured while they're

working uh doing those really important

infrastructure improvement projects

along the roadways. And then last but

not least, uh this April is National

Safe Digging Month in the city of

Columbus. So it's just this is a quick

reminder to all residents. You're going

to see this everywhere. As the weather

gets better, we want to work outside in

our gardens. We want to make home

improvements. So, make sure that you're

calling Ohio811.

It's a simple free step that helps

prevent injuries, protect property, and

keep our families and neighborhoods

safe. Whether you're a contractor or a

homeowner planting a tree, working in

your garden, uh calling 811 helps to

keep our entire community safe. Um so,

call, wait for utilities to be marked,

and then dig with care. Uh Director

Scott, did is there anything I've missed

or is there anything that you would like

to add? Lots of lots of good safety

reminders.

>> Good evening, President Harden, Chair

Burio, um members of council. You you

summarized it very well. Traffic safety

week, very important. We need to be sure

to be out there driving the speed limit.

um looking out for those kids walking

home from school or to school or to

biking or rec going to the rec centers

or libraries and just really um going

out there and

overall be safe driving.

>> And I just wanted to commend the

department. We were talking this

morning, there's 18 of our schools that

are somewhere within the high injury

network. And so that crosswalk, while it

seems like a little thing in terms of

safety, it is a really big thing in

terms of making sure that our kids, our

families are able to safely cross the

road. So these flashing beacons are the

big um crosswalks that flash. I know

folks are not used to them, but please,

please, please make sure that you're

paying attention. It's going to be a

lesson for all of us to learn, and

that's why uh traffic awareness week is

so important. I have two teenage drivers

in my house now. Um so as we're thinking

about them being on the road, training

them early for the things that they need

to watch out for to keep everyone safe

is incredibly important. So thank you

for your work. Um this is more to come,

especially as we think about safe walks

to school and how we in uh continue to

keep our kids safe. So that's all for me

this evening. Thank you, Council

President.

>> Thank you, Council Member Council Member

Deakau.

>> Thank you, Council President. I'm happy

to announce that I will be hosting a

second community meeting to discuss deer

management in the city and provide

further updates on our work and upcoming

legislation. This meeting will be held

in Clintonville at Wetstone Library on

Tuesday, May 5th from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m.

This meeting will be open to all, but

attendees are encouraged to RSVP as

space is limited. Um, more information

on how to RSVP will be announced on

council's social media page soon. And

also the moving day walk in support of

Parkinson's Foundation is this Sunday,

10:00 a.m. at Wolf Park. It is free to

participate in the walk and event info

can be found on my socials. That's all

for me.

>> Thank you, President Pro Tim.

>> Thank you, Council President. I want to

invite uh I do have one resolution. I'm

sorry. I should should have said that

first. uh wanted to invite uh David

Babner uh to the podium as I introduce

uh resolution number 0099X-20226

to recognize the 23rd uh annual how

health capital city half marathon. Um

this half marathon was founded right

here in Columbus back in 2004 and become

a spring right of passage for many

runners here in Columbus. I'm excited to

join near 11,000 uh of my fellow

residents being out there this weekend

running this race. Uh this has grown

into one of the largest and most

recognized half marathons across the

country. Uh the this is the third

straight year that the cap city has been

recognized as the second best um half

marathon according to USA Today. Uh and

I don't know what's going to take to

move us up to one, but you know, we'll

we'll go for that next year. Um, but

it's been a really great race and if if

folks that participated in the past know

what a great atmosphere is created by uh

the folks that put on this event and

certainly it's also served as just a

great place for partnership. Uh,

national organizations like black black

girls run have used this event as a

national meetup um for their members and

this year they're they're doing that as

well. Uh, also it's very exciting. This

body uh is deeply invested in the

Columbus Promise um the city partnership

to help provide uh free Columbus State

tuition to uh Columbus City School

students. Uh the 5K is branded under

that Columbus part or the the Columbus

Promise program to help raise money for

that integral program. Uh so wanted to

again every year be able to acknowledge

this great event that happens downtown.

uh and want to turn the mic over to

David talk a little bit more about the

importance of this race and sort of

what's going on this year. David.

>> Well, thank you very much uh Council

President Harden, President Proemp

Dorans, members of city council. Thank

you so much for the recognition tonight.

My name is David Babner. I'm the founder

and race director of M3S Sports and the

23rd annual Ohio Health Capital City

Half Marathon, Quarter Marathon, and as

Council Member Doran said, the Columbus

Promise 5K taking place this Saturday.

So, we are we are in Cap City Week now.

We'll Saturday the 25th at 8 a.m. we'll

kick off 11,000 runners through our

streets. I wanted to take just a few

minutes tonight to thank you for your

continued and unending support of our

team and the event. When we founded the

event back in 2004, my hair was a lot

darker. And our mission was to create

the best celebration of the healthy,

active lifestyle and help make Columbus

one of the best running and walking

communities in the country. This year,

we can't wait to welcome the 11,000

participants to our remarkable city for

an amazing tour of Columbus. Everyone's

invited and everybody's included at Cap

City. Each year the event continues to

bring in million do millions of dollars

of economic impact but more importantly

changes lives by engaging our community

in the healthy active lifestyle. We know

we have the best city in the country and

for now the third straight year cap city

has been recognized as being one of the

best half marathons in the country.

We could not do what we do without the

tremendous city services in Columbus who

give us unwavering support.

the division of police and division of

fire and all public safety. I know

deputy director speak is here tonight.

Thank you so much. Uh department of

public service and director Scott and

recreation and parks uh director Ree,

thank you so much for all your support

and everything you do for us and our uh

citizens and the community to be able to

produce an event like this. We

understand the important programs you

have developed and continue to develop

and we strive to support them. Since CAP

City was funded or founded, we've

supported the Capitol Kids After School

Program, the City Leaders Program, the

Columbus Promise Program, and now

starting this year, the Columbus Recken

Park Foundation.

Now, we have running groups and

organizations coming to CAP City on an

annual basis from all over the country,

and this year, four other countries. Uh

we are proud that Black Girls Run, one

of the largest national running groups

in the entire country, has selected the

Capitol City Half Marathon for the

second straight year uh for their

national meetup, bringing hundreds of

women from 27 different states around

the country here to Columbus.

I hope many of you will join us on

Friday, this Friday night for the

National Black Girls Run Welcoming

Reception as we celebrate women in

endurance sports. Women represent over

60% of the participants in Cap City and

at M3S Sports, we're excited to

celebrate along with them. And you also,

I know many of you will. I know Council

Member Dors is actually going to

participate and run with us on Saturday

morning, but I hope many of you, if not

all of you, will join me Saturday

morning uh at the event to jump up on

the stage with me and welcome all of our

participants and see why Cap City is one

of the best half marathons in the entire

country. On behalf of Ohio Health, all

our other partners, the Greater Columbus

Sports Commission, the 800 volunteers,

and the 11,000 participants, thank you

so much for the recognition and time

tonight. And if you thought Rose and

Ketche sang an amazing national anthem

in city council chambers, wait till you

hear her voice echo down High Street

from the stage that we built there. Uh

we're so excited to have Rosen to be not

only our national anthem singer, but one

of our ambassadors. Her husband Chris

Glover is here as well tonight. I know

Mark from council is one of our

ambassadors as well. It's pretty amazing

to stand here after 23 years and know

that this has really become something

that the city's proud of and it's an

honor and humbling just to be part of

it. So, thank you for the recognition. I

look forward to seeing everybody this

weekend.

>> Thank you, David. And you buried the

lead there. Uh, Rose's husband is not

just going to be participating, but I

don't know what costume he'll be wearing

this year. I don't know if the Superman

or which Avenger I think not. Yes,

Superman. All right.

Man runs an entire half marathon in a

Superman costume. I barely finished

these events and let alone a man out

there dressed as a superhero. Uh, but I

think it it leans into this. This is

such a festive atmosphere and such a

great race and really a showcase of the

city. Uh it's really an opportunity for

a lot of folks to have a lot of fun

downtown and again as you said sort of

really promote a healthy lifestyle and

it's really accessible when you talk

about uh there being a 5K a quarter

marathon which is really unusual. That's

sort of a tough race to to find out

there and then have that that that

halfarathon option for folks as well. If

folks are interested in throwing on the

running shoes is there still spots

available?

>> Absolutely. Capital cityalfmarathon.com.

We'd love to have them. They can

volunteer, participate. We don't care

how they participate. Just participate.

Run, walk, volunteer. We'd love to see

them out or cheer. It's amazing on these

23 years how organic a lot of our cheer

groups get when you run and you've

participated in the event a number of

times. We'll from every one of the of

the communities that we run through.

It's amazing how many people come out

and cheer on the runners and runners and

walkers. So, yes, absolutely. Capital

cityalfmarathon.com with all the

information. Uh, council mayor,

>> I just also wanted to share I'm so

excited about um Black Girls Run being

part having such a big role this year in

the marathon. Um, quick fun fact, in

1967, the first woman snuck into the

Boston Marathon. She actually registered

under a name that could have been a

male's name and ran the marathon. That

was 59 years ago this year. So kind of

crazy that within our lifetimes uh we

did not believe that women could

physically run a marathon and now 60% of

the women or 60% of our runners are

women. So uh just a fun fact to

celebrate how far we have come and uh

what this marathon means. So

>> and thank you and and M3s sports

produces 15 different events in

Columbus. We touch about 55,000 race

registrations a year and those numbers

of 60% female hold true across all

platform of events.

Thank you, council member. And again,

last thing I'll say, I'm just really

excited about that partnership with the

recreation parks foundation again to

help raise money for, you know, our kids

across Columbus to make sure that

they're having access to youth sports

and all the things that are so near and

dear to the recreation park. So, just

really excited to see that partnership

come together. Uh, and if there's no

other comments, I would like to move for

adoption.

>> Bankston, Barrosa, Deodia, de a dors,

Remy Ross, Vice President Harden.

Thanks, Council President. That's all I

have.

>> Thank you, President Pro Tim. Council

member Green,

Council Member Remy.

Thank you very much,

>> Council President. There we go. Um, I

just got two quick announcements. I

have, um, where are my notes right now?

I have a short-term rental um hearing

tomorrow afternoon here in chambers that

will begin at 3:30. If anybody has any

um public testimony or would like to

speak, please get in touch with my aid

Pedro Mahia um at

um Columbus.gov. So pdmah

columbus.gov. That's PDMJ

at columbus.gov by noon tomorrow. and he

will make sure that you are signed up.

Also, I'd like to uh remind people that

um our annual cleanup for Cleaner

Columbus is um the fifth annual Cleaner

Columbus citywide cleanup will be on May

9th. We hope to see you and your

organizations there. They will be um you

can uh sign up at cleaner Columbus.org.

We will be working across the city on

May 9th. So, please go to

cleanercolus.org to sign up. Thank you

very much, Council President. That's all

I have.

>> Council member, council member Ross.

>> Thank you, Council President. We just

had one resolution on the agenda, but I

am going to request that we uh postpone

resolution 00958-2026

to recognize and celebrate April as fair

housing month in Columbus. We are still

celebrating it, but we are going to wait

to present said resolution until next

Monday on the agenda. So would like to

move to postpone.

>> Second.

>> Cler, please call the role. Banks Timber

Rosa deodia de a dors green remy ros

president Harden

>> postponed

>> thank you that's it from the

>> thank you council member w

>> thank you council president I have one

announcement and one resolution

resolution this evening uh first I'm

excited to share that our next act with

us volunteer opportunity will be taking

place this Saturday April 25th from 10

a.m. to 12 p.m. In honor of Earth Month,

in partnership with a step in the right

direction, we'll be meeting at the

corner of North Chase A and Steel A to

clean up litter in the North Hilltop

neighborhood. All are welcome to join.

You can learn more and RSVP at

columbus.govactwith

us. Uh next, I would like to invite John

McNamera, board president, and Colin

Simpson, uh board member of Green

Columbus, to the podium. Um, Green

Columbus, a local sustainably focused

nonprofit dedicated to increasing tree

canopy coverage in Columbus and central

Ohio. Um, as they come forward, I want

to introduce resolution 006 uh, I'm

sorry, 0096X-2026

to recognize and celebrate April as

Earth Month and Wednesday, April 22nd as

Earth Day in Columbus, Ohio. Earth Month

is an incredibly meaningful time for me.

It is an opportunity to advocate for our

environment, champion sustainable policy

and practices, and encourage individual

and collective action to protect our

planet. Given decision at the federal

level to roll back necessary climate

protections, the role of local

governments and communities to protect

and advocate for our environment has

become more important. I've been lucky

enough to spend a large part of this

month out in community participating in

litter cleanups, community garden

workdays, and tree plantings. And I'm

incredibly moved by the dozens of

community leaders and members that have

spent time um this month who are

actively standing up for our environment

and implementing sustainable practices

in their own neighborhoods. Uh John and

Colin, I I want to thank you both for

being here this evening to accept this

resolution. We are so grateful for the

incredible work of Green Columbus um and

what they do for our community and for

environmental advocacy um not only in

honor of Earth Day and Earth Month, but

all year long. Thank you for the work

you're doing to engage the community and

facilitating massive volunteer efforts

in increasing our city's tree canopy.

Before I move for adoption, would you

like to share a few words?

>> If you don't mind. Uh good evening, uh

Council President Harden, Council

members. My name is John McNamera and I

have the privilege of serving as the

board president for Green Columbus.

Thank you for this recognition and a

special thank you to you, Council Member

Christopher W, for your support and for

helping highlight this work. I'm truly

grateful to be here representing the

thousands of central Ohio residents who

are in our neighborhoods making a real

difference this month. Green Columbus is

powered by dedicated volunteers. And

together, this community that we have

grown shows up by planting thousands of

trees, leading neighborhood cleanups,

and creating healthier, more connected

spaces across our city. Since 2007,

Green has helped plant over 300,000

trees. And every fall, we give away

3,000 free trees so residents can

continue to that impact in their own

backyards. Trees that improve health,

reduce utility bills, and grow the

beauty of this city we love. Each April,

that community spirit comes to life

through our Earth Month Volunteer

Program, which has been recognized as

the nation's largest volunteer-driven

Earth Month effort. This past year, more

than 5,000 volunteers contributed over

22,000 hours, over 170 work sites. All

of that work culminates at our Green

Columbus Earth celebration where we

recognize and thank our volunteers while

bringing the broader community together.

I'd like to invite all council members

and staff to join us this Sunday, April

26th at Sciota Autobon Metrop Park from

11 to 7. This free community event will

feature over 80 local vendors, live

music, food trucks, educational

demonstrations, and plenty of

opportunities to get involved. If anyone

would like to get more involved, you can

find more information at green

seabus.org or follow us on our social

media. Thank you again for this

recognition and supporting the people

who are making Columbus a cleaner,

greener, and stronger community. Thank

you,

>> John. Thank you for being here for the

advocacy and for the work that Green

Columbus does. Um, I had the pleasure of

joining them for a tree planting on the

west side. Sadly, I was like 30 minutes

late and they had already planted how

many trees in that short amount?

>> 500 trees. The Hispanic Coalition works

fast. It was impressive and it was

impressive work to see all that done. I

got to get my photo up. I did plant one.

So, there is one tree that I have to go

back and look at 10 years from now. Um,

any uh council member deco,

>> thank you so much for doing real things.

Real things out there planting trees.

Some folks talk, you guys do. Year after

year, you deliver. And so, I appreciate

that. so much. So, thank you. Thank you

for all the work you do.

>> Thank you, council member.

>> All right. Anyone else thoughts? Uh,

with that, I move for adoption.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Bankston Barosa Deodia de AOA Dorn Remy

Ross Weiss, President Harden.

>> Adopted.

Thank you, council member. Um, I think

it's my only announcement, but um, this

is the first council meeting that we

have had since uh, auditor Megan Kilgore

has announced that she's taken an

amazing amazing um, opportunity uh, for

her and her family. And um you know, I

told her told this to her privately uh

earlier this week or last week that she

had just about the largest of shoes to

step into uh following Mr. Dorian. And

not only did she fill those shoes out,

she um stewarded our city in such an

amazing and steady way for the last

eight years. Would you help me uh be the

first in a public way to celebrate her

and thank her for her leadership?

Now, this is not the day where we go

around the dis and cry and stuff that

will come. Um, but I I would um want to

offer the floor to uh Megan uh and then

talk just about the application process

uh after that. Thank you.

President Hart and members of council,

thank you. Um, you are right. My

predecessor had pretty much won every

single award available in this country,

but um, the big one was that he had

earned a medal from the Pope himself.

And so I knew going in was very, very

big shoes to fill. Um, but I uh, you

know, I believe very firmly that the

right time to transition is when an

office is at its peak. And that is, I'm

very proud to say really where it is

today. And because um, of the kind of

magnitude of of how few auditors we've

had, believe it or not, we've only had

eight.

I'd like to share, if you um will allow

me, just a few uh, reflections as you

consider this appointment, which is

which is of course yours. The city

auditor in many ways is the quiet

backbone of a lot of things. I say we

kind of keep the lights on of our of our

city. Our office is responsible for

managing billions of dollars, overseeing

some of the most complex financial

systems you can think of and also

maintaining the trust of external

partners from Wall Street to Mainstream.

And in many ways, our office because of

its scale, it really operates similar to

that of a Fortune 500, but with the

added twist of public accountability and

the relationships that we have to

maintain and the credibility, they're

not abstract, and they're certainly not

earned overnight. They've been built

upon years and years. And it affects

everything from our city's cost of

borrowing. Every single time we go out

and issue a, you know, a million-doll

project of bonds, every single 01% that

we can save means more dollars for

council and the mayor to make decisions

with that go directly to our

neighborhoods and our residents. And so

Columbus is in this really incredible

position that few cities in our country

have the opportunity to occupy and

frankly most envy. and that is we have

the highest credit ratings possible. We

have an incredibly strong set of

financial systems and we have a

nationally recognized modern

high-performant office infrastructure

and that really did not happen by

accident. It has taken a lot of

technical expertise, a lot of knowledge

as to the market and certainly the

broader geopolitical systems that every

single day can influence what we have to

do in our day's work. It also very

sincerely reflects the historical

importance that I think council and the

mayor and my colleagues across this city

have placed on this office. As I shared,

there have only been eight auditors, but

believe it or not, the three before me

were all appointed by council because of

their respective expertises. It's a

really, really interesting history. But

for those individuals who served for

almost I think 82 years, they all came

from positions of national and state

leadership. And so, you know, as I I I

really request your support and

participation as you think about who is

next and who is going to be best to live

lead the city, you know, forward. I must

also acknowledge that like my

predecessor, we probably didn't do a

really good job of always making our

work as visible as we could. We didn't

always show behind the scenes what all

is being done. I think it's sexy, but I

do respect deeply that not everyone else

does. Much of what we do happens behind

the scenes. It's complex. It's highly

technical, and it doesn't always

translate easily. So, I I just bet you

know how deeply consequential it is. So

as you consider this appointment, I I

took a step back and I thought about

what are the factors that I think have

historically mattered the most. And they

would be very quickly experience in

public finance, capital markets and debt

issuance. We are the face of Wall

Street. Established relationships with

rating agencies, bond holders, folks who

are going to be doing business and

trying to help us finance things like

our clean drinking water. And very very

importantly, because the city currently

holds the highest marks for management,

an absolutely perfect score in our

financial management, I would really ask

um your consideration as you look at the

candidates that will come before you.

Can this potential appointee

walk into the role on day one and add

credibility to this conversation? And I

really, really, really want to commit

anything that I can do to help you in

this transition, anything that I can do

to provide context to the role, what we

do, I will be your partner this week,

next week, whatever I can do to help.

Thank you so much for caring really.

There are a lot of people upstairs in

the balcony who are really, really on

pins and needles about the next steps

and um committed to doing what I can.

Council President, thank you.

I almost said don't leave.

Um, so council is accepting. Thank you,

Megan. Seriously, thank you for your

leadership. Thank you for your

friendship. Uh council is accepting

applications to fill the upcoming

vacancy in the office of the city

auditor following uh auditor Megan

Kilgore's announcement that she will

step down on May 4th, 2026. Uh

interested residents are encouraged to

apply using the form on council's

website. Applications will be accepted

through Thursday, April 23rd at 12:00

p.m. And just to be clear, and this

might even be a question for um Mr.

bias. One of the reasons why this might

seem like an extremely tight turnaround,

it is because it is our understanding

that charter says that uh we cannot be

without a auditor. And so when uh

Auditor Kilgore told us the date she

would like to to to leave, we are

working our very best to make uh sure

that in very short order, we run a open

and transparent process that will allow

us to have an auditor in place so that

you um as you certainly have the right

to do can um make your transition. And

so uh is that is that our understanding?

Okay. Well, thank you again, uh, Auditor

Kilgore. And like I said, there will be,

I'm sure, many, well, not I'm sure we

will be a part of the many, um,

recognitions and celebrations of your

service to, uh, our community over, um,

the last, um, really decade or so, uh,

more than decade if you've been in this

building. So, thank you. Uh, are there

any other comments by elected officials,

uh, treasure, city attorney's office?

Are there any requests by members of

council for the removal of an ordinance

or resolution from the consent portion

of the agenda? Hearing none, may we now

have a motion to wave readings of the

titles of 30-day legislation by the city

clerk.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Thanks, Temper Rosa Deodia de AOA, Dors

Green, Remy Ross, Vice President Harden.

>> Thank you. Will the clerk now read to

the record the ordinance numbers of

30-day legislation on tonight's agenda

for first reading? Public Service and

Transportation Committee, we have

ordinance 924 and 1032-2026.

Neighborhoods, Recreation, and Parks

Committee, we have ordinance 956-2026.

Housing, Homelessness, and Building

Committee, Ordinance 1059-2026.

Public Utilities, and Sustainability

Committee Resolution 82X-2026.

Ordinances 673, 689, and 996-2026.

Zonings we have ordinance 290 1035 and

1136-2026.

Variances we have ordinance 291 1036

1116 1137 1139 and 1143-2026.

>> Thank you uh madame clerk. Uh the

following ordinance appear on our agenda

as consent action. Will the clerk read

those into the record? Resolutions of

expression 102X,

92X, 97X, 98X, 106X, 107X, 94X, and

101X-2026.

And finance and governance committee, we

have ordinance 746, 1002, 1018, 1098,

1131-2026,

economic development and small and

minority business committee. We have

ordinances 961 and 952-2026.

Public service and transportation

committee. We have ordinance 937-2026.

Neighborhoods recreation and parks

committee. We have ordinance 679-2026.

Health I'm sorry, health, human

services, and equity committee. We have

ordinance 1007, 1011, and 1014-2026.

Public Safety and Criminal Justice

Committee, Ordinance 901, 977, and

978-2026.

Housing, Homelessness, and Building

Committee, Ordinance 926, 9990, 9993,

and 11:01-2026.

Public Utilities, and Sustainability

Committee, we have ordinance 878, 893,

9992, 942, 9992, 1013, and 1038-2026.

appointments we have A32 and A80-2026.

>> Thank you, Madame Clerk. Um, are there

any questions or comments on the consent

portion of the agenda? Hearing none, may

we have a motion of approval of these

items designated as consent.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks Tim Barrosa Deodia de Aar Dors

Green Remy Ross Vice President Harden.

>> Consent agenda is passed. We'll now

proceed with the second reading of

30-day postponed emergency legislation.

However, we will go out of order this

evening and start with ordinance 0920

uh 23-226 and rules and policy. I chair

this committee, but I'll turn it over to

council member Bankston. Council member,

the floor is yours.

>> Uh thank you, uh council president. Yes,

on page 16 of our rules and policy

committee. Uh, I have tonight ordinance

0923-2026

to enact 4515

of the Columbus city codes to create

okay to create a rental uh to create a

registry of residential rental

properties. Uh, council members, uh, as

you all know, over the last nine months,

my office held a robust community

engagement process to discuss the

establishment of a city rental registry.

The purpose of this registry is to give

the city a proactive datadriven tool to

manage the health and safety of our

housing stock and protect our most

vulnerable. Tonight, I ask that you join

me in taking this monumental step in

ensuring that no matter your income or

zip code, that you can find and live in

safe, healthy housing in the city. The

structure of the registry is simple.

Every residential rental property in

Columbus must register annually and must

share information such as a named local

operator and emergency contact for

property uh number of dwelling units,

all partial IDs associated with the

property and information on shared

mechanical systems and shared spaces.

Every three years, our department of

building and zoning services will

conduct a free preventative education

inspection of exterior common exteriors

and common areas and shared systems if

they exist. Think of these again as

checkins meant to educate, identify

concerns, and refer serious life safety

issues to the appropriate agencies.

Properties with uh uh repeated code

violations, unresolved safety orders, or

public nuisance designations will be

given conditional registration status

that triggers mandatory common area

inspections. Inspections of up to 10% of

units required remediation plans and

daily occurring civil penalties until

violations are addressed. This is meant

to address the worst of the worst

problem properties uh and owners. Uh

there is a fee and the fee uh for the

registry will be $15 a unit capped at

$1,500 for a single property. And think

about this, that is the amount to a

$1.20 a month per unit over the course

of a year and even less if you have over

100 units thanks to the cap. And I

believe that that is a fair price for

accountability. Throughout our

stakeholder engagement process, we

received a lot of feedback both for for

and against this proposal. Opponents of

this uh proposal cited concerns about

costs over complications and

duplications. And let me be clear as

chair of the economic development small

business committee. I heard and

empathized with those concerns as our

housing providers are small businesses

in many cases. Uh they are part of the

small business ecosystem. And so

throughout that process, we made many

changes uh to the rental registry that

you see today and heard their feedback

in earnest. In addition to all of that,

we made sure to engage our partners in

the Franklin County auditor's office

throughout this process to ensure that

this registry also made sense to them

given their ownership of the

statemandated registry that is held at

the county. Uh before I go on and I know

we do have some speakers. I do want to

have some clarifying uh questions here

of both Director Messer and Director

Stevens because this was truly a

partnership between building and zoning

as well as our department of

development. Uh Director uh Messer, you

know, we've heard folks claim that this

registry is really duplicative and

unnecessary. Can you just speak to where

the county auditor is on this proposal?

Council member Council Member Banks and

uh President Harden, other members of

council, thank you um for your uh

partnership and first of all in creating

uh this legislation and bringing it to

where we are. Uh it's been a pleasure to

work with your office and the open and

transparent uh process was um very

wellreceived I think. Um let me just say

that in terms of the um county

registration, it is a little different.

The county registration is um uh does

not contain some of the same information

that we're going to be requiring in this

uh registry. There's no inspection

process and largely uh it's it's a

one-time uh voluntary registration. Um

but we heard the concerns of of folks

that there would be duplication and

registering with the county and with the

city. And we have uh engaged with um uh

auditor staniano's office and we have a

letter of intent that we've agreed to

where we will share information and work

to techn technology-wise to integrate

the registries so that folks who

register with one or the other that

information can be shared to try to cut

down on the uh I guess administrative uh

challenge or burden that applicants

might uh have. So, um, so for example,

if you've already registered with, um,

the county auditor's office, a lot of

that information may automatically

populate in your registry with the city

so that you wouldn't have to duplicate

those efforts and entering all that same

information and vice versa. Um, but to

be clear, you would still be required to

register with the city of Columbus under

the new registry. uh but that

partnership with the county auditor

would allow a lot of that data and

information to automatically flow

between the two entities.

>> Thank you for that, director. And then I

think the other thing I just want to

highlight um here in this space again

when costs are introduced I think

there's natural uh push back from folks

that there's costs I think uh increasing

uh everywhere around us but it does cost

to run this type of program. Can you

just talk about the philosophy around

the $15 uh and the max uh and how those

dollars will be utilized?

>> Sure, council member. Um, one thing that

I'm not sure I might have missed in your

remarks, but you know, the original

proposal uh actually uh thought about a

fee of $40 per unit. We have

significantly decreased that fee down to

$15 per unit uh in light of some of the

uh back and forth with uh various

stakeholders. Um but that $15 per unit

is going to go to uh several different

areas. One, um there is definitely

technology that's involved in this. Um

our intention is to make this uh as easy

as a process as possible, largely being

online with the use of technology, folks

being able to register uh very simply

and easily and pay their fees directly

online. Um we have um other registries

that this um uh registry will integrate

with so that data sharing and

information and mapping across the city

uh will be very helpful and advantageous

once we have the registry up and

running. So there is a cost to the

technology side of implementing this.

There's also going to need to be some

staffing both on the administrative side

as well as on the enforcement side and

the inspection piece that you mentioned

earlier um which will be free of charge

to the um customer um comes at a cost to

us um as well and so we will be

implementing um all three of those

areas.

>> Thank you for that. Uh and then I want

to go to our department of development

uh director Stevens I know that uh you

all are on the front lines of housing.

continue to speak to how this data that

we will now have, how will that help

inform uh the city's housing strategy?

>> Good evening, President Harden, Chair

Banks, members of council. As you know,

our housing strategy is to build more

units, invest in the market, invest

where the market does not, preserve the

naturally occurring affordability, as

well as include all residents. So, we

will use this data from the um rental

registry to help our h division of

housing stability who are serving our

residents every day and make sure that

they are not being exploited by

landlords and property owners.

>> Thank you, uh, director. Uh, and

speaking about front lines, we do also

have with us today Michael Edwards from

Legal Aid. I'm going to ask him to come

at this time.

There he is. I saw people moving in the

balcony. I thought you was in the

balcony. Michael, I was about to say

it's going have to fill a buster here

till you get down here.

>> Uh, council actually, can I just step

in? Um, we have room in 225 if anybody

would like to go to 225 and sit down. It

is being live streamed in uh there as

well. It's just right outside the door

if folks would like a seat.

>> Sorry, council member.

>> No, no problem. Thank you, Council

President, for that housekeeping. Um,

again, I want to invite Michael uh just

to give some remarks. I know you were

with legal aid and on the front lines

for us enforcing uh our housing um um

equity in the city. So, I'll turn it

over to you, Michael.

>> Thank you, Councilman, and thank you to

the C council a whole um thank you to

the members of the city council for your

leadership in advancing this rental

registry ordinance. Um this legislation

reflects an important truth. Columbus is

no longer a small and midsize rental

market. It functions like a major

metropolitan housing system and as such

it requires the appropriate tools to

ensure accountability, transparency and

basic habitability. To ground this in

real terms, I want to briefly describe

what this ordinance means on the ground.

Right now, my colleagues and I are

working with tenants in a large rental

property where conditions are simply

unacceptable.

non-working air conditioning and

furnaces, structural issues, and

deteriorating exterior conditions. These

are not isolated complaints.

They are widespread, repeated, and

ongoing. When we try to identify the

owner, we often find an only an LLC

listed on the auditor's website. There

is no there is no human point of

contact, no accountable decision maker.

So, what happens next? We gather tenant

letters requesting repairs. We represent

tenants in rent escro cases. And only

when rent stops flowing does the true

owner emerge, appearing in escro court.

And only then do serious repair

discussions begin. That is the current

system. It is reactive.

It is inefficient and it places the

burden on tenants, often low-income

tenants, to force accountability through

legal processes. This ordinance begins

to fix that by requiring clear ownership

information and creating a structured

registration system. It allows tenants,

advocates, and the city to engage

property owners earlier in the process

before conditions deteriorate into

crisis and before escort becomes the

only visible tool. The preventative

education inspection program, which is

part of this ordinance, is another

strong step forward. It shifts the

system from reactive enforcement to

proactive engagement, modeling other

major cities by identifying problems

earlier, informing owners of their

obligations, and generating data that

can reveal patterns of neglect that are

currently invisible.

And importantly, the conditional

registration status provision introduces

real leverage for tenants. When

properties accumulate repeated code

violations, they are flagged and

subjected to increased scrutiny. This is

critical. It means tenants by simply

using existing tools, calling 311,

requesting inspections can trigger

consequences that owners cannot ignore.

That is meaningful shift in power.

But I want to be very clear, the

effectiveness of this new ordinance will

depend on how these mechanisms function

in practice. First, retaliation remains

a serious barrier. The ordinance assumes

tenants will will contact code

enforcement about unressed housing

conditions. However, even with the

city's retaliation ordinance in place,

many will remain afraid to do so. They

fear eviction, lease non-renewal, or

other forms of retaliation. Continuing

to explore stronger tenant protections

and increasing enforcement of the city's

current retaliation ordinance will help

ensure that vulnerable and easy

intimidated tenants will request repairs

and call 311 if necessary instead of

call instead of silently enduring poor

housing conditions in a state of fear.

Second,

there is the question of enforcement

pressure and discretion. The conditional

registration threshold is powerful, but

it may also create unintended pressure

on code enforcement officers. When a

single addition when a single additional

violation can place a property on the

conditional registration list, there is

a risk whether real or perceived that

enforcement decisions become more

cautious. Ensuring that enforce that

officers are fully supported in making

objective consistent determinations will

reduce this risk.

Third, the small owner exemption opens

the possibility of a loophole. An owner

with 10 or fewer units is not required

to designate a local operator. In

practice, this could mean an out ofstate

owner with no meaningful local presence

or a developer placing multiple small

properties into separate LLC's can seek

to avoid accountability altogether.

This could leave tenants trying to

resolve serious conditions with someone

hundreds or thousands of miles away and

can undermine one of the core goals of

this ordinance, which is improving

visibility.

In closing, I want to emphasize this.

This ordinance is a major step in the

right direction. Columbus is a major

metropolitan city now, and we need

visibility into the condition of rental

housing to protect the safety of our

residents. This is not just about data

registration or compliance systems. It

is about whether tenants can live in a

safe habitable habitable housing without

having to initiate legal action just to

get basic repairs. It is about whether

accountability is proactive or only

triggered by crisis. And it is about

whether the city is willing to continue

building on this foundation to close the

gaps that experience will inevitably

reveal.

This is a strong and necessary step

forward that will help Columbus tenants.

On behalf of Lasco, we thank the council

for the hard work that went into this

legislation and we appreciate the

commitment to examining it and refining

it over the coming years.

>> Thank you.

>> Uh thank you, Michael.

Thank uh thank you Michael. Thank you

for legal aid and the work that you all

are doing every single day in our

communities down at the eviction court.

Uh it makes a a real difference and I

think you stole my thunder there at the

end which is in this legislation. we

have a review period where we will

review this uh and continue to make sure

uh that it evolves and works for our

city because our city is evolving and I

appreciate you all being at uh there

with us as we continue to look at this.

So, thank you again.

>> Thank you, sir.

>> We also do have um u public speakers in

support of this. So, I'm going to call

them at this time as well. First is Jeff

Coll and followed by Miss Julianne

Johnson if they can come in that order.

and Mr. Kovville, welcome back to

council. Your name, or any organization

you're representing, you have three

minutes.

>> President Harden, council members, my

name is Jeff Kovll. I'm a Columbus

resident and I am a landlord. I endorse

this proposed rental registry. I'd like

to tell you why. There are some

professions that arouse negative

feelings that may not generally be

justified, but there are enough bad

apples that negativity abounds. Think

you car salesman and yes, landlords.

I'd like to be proud when I say I am a

landlord. This proposal eliminates some

of the reasons why landlords are often

looked at poorly. The rental registry

proposal is more than reasonable.

The fee is so low as to be laughable.

The requirement to identify the owner,

to have local contact for emergencies

and repairs, any property owner who

resists this is not responsible and

deserves closer scrutiny by the city.

Knowing who to call locally for problems

and emergencies is just common sense.

a city inspector looking around the

exterior and common areas every 3 years.

Come on, other landlords. What are you

afraid of?

Does this registry duplicate the county?

No. The county registry is not enforced.

I had unregistered properties for years

before I even knew the county registry

existed. No one called. No one contacted

me. One more reason for my support, my

tenants. My tenants provide me with

income. They deserve to be treated

fairly on a business level. I deserve

timely payment. My tenants deserve

clean, safe housing and a local contact

in order to report problems. Thank you.

Thank you. Um, thank you, Jeff. And I

know that you've been outspoken and uh

been at this process every step of the

way. So, thank you for your continued

advocacy. Uh, next is Miss Julianne

Johnson.

>> Thank you, Councilman Bagston, President

Harden, and Council members. I'm here on

behalf of a Haitian uh immigrant family

who I've been working with who who um

doesn't can't take the risk of coming

forward. So, my name is Julianne

Johnson. I live in the east side of

Columbus. I'm a member of Redeemer

Lutheran Church on James Road and uh

near Scotwood um and an active member of

bread. I am here to speak in favor of

the registry. For the past year, our

church has been helping im Asian im

Haitian immigrants that are in our

community.

I have particularly been involved with a

family with a a couple with two

children, one six years old and the

other five months old. They live in

apartment complex that has four

buildings of about 35 apartments each in

on the east side of Columbus. Although

I'm retired now, my career was spent

advocating for people with disabilities.

I get how systems work and don't work

for people, especially those living on

the margins.

I have intervened for this family when

they got an eviction notice, which when

I researched it was based only on a late

fee they didn't know about because their

check didn't get to Cleveland when they

turned it in at the local office.

I intervened when they got had no heat

in early December when the baby was less

than two weeks old. I intervened one

month that their rent had been stolen by

an office staff person

and they were again charged.

The common areas of their building which

are not secured are filthy and in

illrepair. people gather there with

arguments, drinking, smoking, whatever.

Uh on very frequent occasions, they have

tried unsuccessfully

to to address their issues

themselves, which is what they'd prefer

to do.

It's not been successful without

somebody else intervening. So, I go to

the office now every two or three months

and frankly use my privilege to get

things they should be able to get for

themselves.

This family takes real risks living

daytoday in this city as immigrants. I

urge you to pass this rental registry.

Give them and others another tool to

handle the issues they face. Thank you

very much.

Miss Johnson,

Miss Johnson.

Miss Johnson.

Miss Johnson, I know you probably

couldn't hear me over the thunderous

applause. I think council member Rosa

Depia had a comment or question for you.

>> I did. I just um I just wanted to say

thank you. I wanted to say thank you

because um you know I think when you

talk about people living on the margins,

I think um language attainment is still

a challenge. You know, my parents came

to this country in 1970 when there was

no ESL. my sisters went to school and

completely learn in English classrooms

where they spoke 100% Spanish and people

spoke 100% English you know um if it was

not but for community members like

yourself and other people who reached

out and who were the spokesperson who

could break down systems for them who

could translate things for them that

wouldn't have happened and that's the

work that you're doing that's the work

that Brett is doing and I think that

that is part of the goal with this

rental registry I I think when we think

about I think often times when we put

policies into place and sometimes when

it feels like the people most affected

are like wait a minute what is this

going to do for us they don't realize

we're not talking about them if you're

doing the right thing we are talking

about the people who aren't doing the

right thing and there's too many of them

that are not there's too many of them

that are taking advantage of our

families there's too many of them that

when people are scared scared and

vulnerable that they don't have someone

who's showing for them. And so I

appreciate you being that voice because

I think that this is what is driving the

growth in our city. And so continuous

continuing to be a voice for those

folks, continuing to be a voice for a

community that can't always show up for

themselves, can't always advocate for

themselves is incredibly um important,

especially at this time. So I think as

we talk about especially as we talk

about tenants rights these this

community and not just Haitian wherever

you come from in the world are some of

the folks who are getting most taken

advantage of and so I just want to thank

you for bringing that perspective into

the conversation because it is taking up

care of everyone and if we take care of

the people furthest from justice then

all boats will rise and we ensure that

everyone is just we ensure that a system

is is accessible to everyone. So, I just

wanted to just say thank you for for

being here tonight and thank you for

continuing to advocate for that family

and you um are my neighbor because I

live right off of James Road. So,

>> and every time I go I'm aware of how

many other people don't have somebody to

step in for them and how I can't do

that. But um but there are many people

who don't have the privilege of having

somebody that they've they've made a

contact with and can can do it.

>> 100 100%. And they're not always here.

Yeah.

>> And they don't know to come down here

and they don't know to be that voice.

And so

>> for them, too.

>> Yeah. So, thank you.

>> Thank you.

Thank you. Uh thank thank you again,

Miss Julian. And I also just want to

shout out and thank uh Bred uh as well,

the organization who has been working

tirelessly uh on this and partnering

with us. I especially want to thank them

because I said early on that uh

legislation is many times about

compromise and when there were things in

there that they uh didn't get they

advocated for, they still stayed at the

table, still leaned in, uh still helped

us get to this and strengthen this. And

so I want to thank Bred uh and all their

members for all the work they're doing.

I see some of the leadership here. So I

just wanted to call that out and thank

you. Um before I move on to my final

comments and passage, are there any

questions or comments from my colleagues

either for speakers or for uh the

administration? I know that I think some

of my colleague Council Ross.

>> Sure. Thank you. Um Chair Bankston, I do

have a question for the Department of

Development within the Division of

Housing Stability. What is your plan to

address I think what uh our partners at

legal aid very succinctly called uh the

inability to be proactive if folks are

not willing to engage code enforcement.

Um are you looking to do education? Are

you looking to um connect with

communities and connect with residents

and tenants in the community to let them

know about this resource build rapport

so they are feeling more comfortable

calling code enforcement?

>> Um thank you President Harden. Council

member Ross, members of council, yeah,

as we set up our division of housing

stability, how we go out and engage with

our residents is going to be critical to

the success of that work. So, with our

partners at legal aid, CSB, others, um,

the programs we develop in the in the

outreach is going to be an important

aspect of that.

>> Do you anticipate the new administrator

of the division to be kind of leading

that charge?

>> Yes.

Council Council member

>> just along those lines I think I don't I

I don't want to make any assumptions but

we are thinking about just what our next

speaker our last speaker talked about

how are they culturally competent how

are they bilingual how are we reaching

out in those specific instances so when

we can ensure that we can have those

conversations with because as we know um

and I think you said it best these are

small business owners and so they come

from many different backgrounds So

ensuring that's part of our thinking.

Yes.

>> Yes.

>> Any other questions or comments?

>> Council member Roomie.

>> Thank you very much, Chair. I appreciate

the work that you put into this. Um I

want to start by saying, you know, I

understand exactly what this legislation

is trying to do. We all want to hold bad

landlords accountable and I appreciate

the work that has gone into getting this

ordinance to a much better place. I

understand where my colleagues are

coming from, but I have made my concerns

known throughout that at the end of the

day, I do not believe this version gets

us all the way there. So for me, it

still places too much administrative

burden on the overwhelming majority of

responsible property owners who are

doing the right thing in an effort to

get at the small number who are not. So

I think we've made real progress. I

think this conversation has been

valuable and ongoing and I think the

goal is the right one, but I also think

good intentions do not automatically

make for good policy. So tonight, I'll

be voting no. Not because I oppose

accountability, but because I believe we

still need a more targeted approach that

better focuses on bad actors without

creating unnecessary burdens for

everyone else. Thank you, Chair.

>> Uh thank you, Council Member Reie. And I

think there was something said uh with

you both about this idea of

predictability. I just want to that

folks that this is the first piece.

there's going to be other pieces that

come um down the line particularly when

we talk about the fee schedule. Uh and

so I know one of the things that I am

going to be looking forward to and

working with the department uh is around

ensuring that that fee is frozen if at

least for the first three years as we go

through this pilot uh to ensure some

predictability. And so we will have

those conversations as we get to that uh

uh point because that fee is not here

today and some other pieces uh those are

other subsequent pieces of legislation

that will come down the line. So, thank

you for your comments, Council

President.

>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, as we were

going through this conversation, it it

dawned on me that um both Chair Ross of

the housing committee and myself as

former chair of the housing uh homeless

committee are also part of the uh

renters caucus. Uh we rent here in

Columbus. And as I was listening to Mr.

Coell, I was thinking that's the kind of

landlord that we all deserve. That's the

kind of landlord that we all deserve.

Um, just want to thank you. You know,

I'm big on process. Process matters. I

talk about it all the time. Being

inclusive. Make sure you're listening to

the folks who will support these things,

but also the folks who will disagree

with it. That we know what and and

deeply understand um where they will be

coming from in their disagreement. And

you led a very thorough process. I

believe um one that truthfully and what

is pretty cool about this piece of

legislation, this actually wraps up our

housing for all package that council

member Shayla Favor, our prosecutor

Shayla Faver started three years ago. Um

this is the very last piece that that

was announced and it was thoughtful. It

was thor it was this was hard because we

were we I think and I I've heard you say

this we see landlords essentially

especially the smaller ones as small

business owners and so we're not trying

to penalize more especially with the

rising cost of tax uh of property taxes

to to penalize but we are prioritizing

accountability

and I think that uh you've done a good

job of weaving those things together. So

just thank you for your leadership. Um

this is government action. I really do

appreciate um on this night when we do

have so many folks who are first time uh

in council chambers that that you are

seeing even disagreement you're seeing

um how this process um has gotten us

here. So thank you. Thank you to all the

community partners that weighed in those

who are supporting and those who may not

be. One of the things that council

member also I think put into the

legislation was this review period. So

we will have time to to to to

make any adjustments that um folks may

bring to us that we uh might may have

missed. So thank you for your

leadership.

>> Uh thank you uh Cath president and oh

sorry

council member.

>> Yeah. Thank you. Um, I come from a

family of realtors, so I have this

conflicted feeling. And so I concur with

my colleague, um, Council Member Reie,

but I trust in your judgment and your

commitment to the review and for making

things better. And so that is why I'll

vote yes because of my trust in you to

continue to make this um, this registry

better.

>> Well, thank you, council member. Um, and

to council president's point, this does

round out housing for all, but the word

says the last shall be first. So

therefore, I'm I'm gonna take it that

way. Uh, but I do think that, and I also

didn't realize when I raised my hand for

this one, this be the most complex one.

U, but again, we wanted to get to a

place where we were delivering something

that we think that could stand muster,

uh, that could have teeth, uh, and that

would be something that would work for,

uh, Columbus. And I think that is what

we have here today. So again, um, as I

wrap up, I want to, uh, thank everyone

that testified, everyone that's

participated through these three

hearings. Also, again, want to thank our

Department of Building and Zoning

Services as well as our Department of

Development for their partnership and

putting this framework and legislation

together. I also want to thank the team

uh, behind the scenes. I think that we

none of this happens without a great

team. And I think that effective

leadership is not simply about the

credentials or the person that is the

principle, but it's about how you

surround yourself with key folks who are

experts in certain areas. And so again,

I want to thank uh my aid JP Dorval, uh

Jonathan Brown on my team, as well as

Jessica Clinger and our council

president's offices and Katie Fallon on

our legislative research office for all

of the work that they have done uh

behind the scenes to get us here. Um and

I want to thank them, thank them, thank

them. Uh this proposal is not perfect um

and it is certainly not a silver bullet

uh to solve our housing issues but it is

the right thing to do and it is a right

step in the right direction for our

city. Our city is evolving and when I

hear these stories of what is happening

in so many properties that shows us that

as our city continues to grow we have to

check all of our systems and when

they're broken it's not that we continue

to allow that to happen. it is our job

uh to go and try to fix them to meet the

needs of our residents today and I will

continue to do that. Uh so with that uh

I will uh I see no other questions or

comments from my colleagues. I will move

for passage

>> second

>> by voice.

Bankston,

>> yes.

>> Barrosa de Padilla,

>> yes.

>> Deakau,

>> yes.

>> Dorren,

>> yes.

>> Green,

>> yes.

>> Remy,

>> no.

>> Ross,

>> yes.

>> White,

>> yes.

>> President Harden,

>> yes. What is this?

>> Thank you.

and

council president. May I move to the

finance and governance committee?

>> Please.

>> Uh, thank you. First up in finance and

governance, we have ordinance 0634-2026

to authorize the director of department

of finance and management to enter into

a contract for the option to purchase

waste identification disposal and

emergency spill response services with

Buckeye M contracting LLC to weigh the

competitive bidding requirements that

the evaluation committee for the best

value procurement be made up of an an

odd number of people and to authorize

this expenditure.

Uh, this ordinance establishes a

universal term contract with Buckeye M

cont Contracting LLC for the

identification and cleanup and disposal

of hazardous and non-hazardous waste.

Three bids were received and Buckeye M

contracting received the highest score.

Are there any questions or comments from

my colleagues? Seeing none, I move for

passage.

>> Clarosa

de Podia de Aawa Doris Green Reie Ross

Swice President Harden

>> pass. My bad. And finally in the finance

and governance committee we have

ordinance 0983-2026

to uh this ordinance authorizes the

director of the department of technology

to enter into a contract with VAS

computer inc for Oracle software

licenses maintenance and support

services to authorize the expenditure of

1 million48,97265

from the department of technology

information services operating fund and

to declare an emergency. Oracle is the

database engine behind multiple

applications in the city of Columbus

such as Excella, the Columbus utilities

billing system, and the work and asset

management system. Two bids were

received for Oracle software licenses,

maintenance and support services in

March of this year. Vasque Computer,

Inc. was the lowest bidder. To ensure no

service interruption and the

establishment uh and to establish a

purchase order at the earliest possible

date, emergency designation is being

requested. Are there any comments or

questions from my colleagues? Seeing

none, I move for passage.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Bangarosa deodia de a dors green remy

ros vice president Harden

>> pass. Thank you, council president. May

I move to the economic development

committee. Chair, if it's all right, I

think I'm going to uh call for recess.

And just to explain to folks who again

who are not here uh often, uh by code,

we have to uh recess and take the zoning

meeting uh uh at 6:30 p.m. Uh we only

have three ordinance on the um zoning in

the zoning committee. So, we uh

anticipate this being uh very quick and

I think that a lot of folks here are

part of a want to be part of the larger

conversation that we're going to have in

your committee uh coming up. self if you

don't mind. Is there a motion to recess

for zoning?

>> So move.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks Rosa Podia de Aar Dors Green Remy

Ross, Vice President Hard.

>> We are in recess. We will uh start

zoning kind of promptly at 6:30ish.

Daddy.

Hey.

Just about to feel it.

You got to feel it.

Doctorilly

dilly dilly dilly dilly.

Heat. Heat.

Heat.

Heat.

Heat. Heat.

Heat. Heat.

Heat. Heat.

Heat. Heat.

Heat.

Heat.

Heat.

Hey. Hey. Hey.

Heat. Heat.

Heat up here.

Heat. Heat.

Heat. Heat.

Order. Clerk, please call the role.

>> Bank Simber Rosa Padilla de AOA Dors

Green Remy Ross Vice President Harden.

>> Can I get a motion with the reading of

the journal?

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Bank Simber Rosa Deodia de Aawa Dorren

Green Remy Ross Vice President Harden.

>> Are there any additions or corrections

to the journal hearing? None. The

journal is approved. We'll now go to the

zoning committee. Council member Dorren

chairs that committee and all members

serve on it. Council member, the floor

is yours.

>> Thank you, President Harden. As always,

before we begin tonight's zoning agenda,

I'll briefly explain a rule speaking

before council on reszoning and

variances. We will only hear a staff

presentation for ordinances that have a

disapproval from a recommending body or

if we have a public speaker to sign up

to speak against an ordinance. We permit

three speakers on each side, three

proponents, three opponents. Uh we ask

those speakers limit the remarks to

three minutes per the standard rules of

city council. All speakers and council

variance, including city staff, area

commission, applicants, and members of

the public will be sworn in before they

give testimony. Representatives and area

commission are always able to speak on

an ordinance and do not need to fill out

a speaker slip. Will you ask uh you

alert city staff of your intention to

speak at this committee hearing? Uh this

evening we do not have any public

speakers signed up to speak on any piece

of legislation this committee. On the

advice to city attorney's office will

now swear in city staff. Please stand

and raise your right hand and be sworn

in. Do you swear affirm the test you're

about to give shall be the truth nothing

but the truth as you shall answer under

pains of penalty of perjury. If so,

please say I do.

Thank you. Please let the record reflect

that Alyssa Saltzman from the Department

of Building and Zing Services has been

sworn in. Uh first, uh we only have

council variances on our agenda here

tonight. And first we have ordinance 0

or I'm sorry 10006-2026

to grant a variance provision section

34E2100A

use table of the Columbus City codes to

the property located at 3616 East Broad

Street to allow for accessory outdoor

storage in the CAC community activity

district. site consists of one parcel

developed with a big box retailer and

the applicant requested accessory

storage uses uh including a trailer in

conjunction with the retail business at

that property. A council variance

required because storage uses are not

allowed in that zoning district.

Additionally, the requested uh variance

will facilitate an updated final site

plan compliance to respond to an active

zoning code violation. U the proposal is

approved from city staff and the M East

area commission. Do my colleagues

questions comments? Seeing none, I first

move to accept the entire staff report

into evidence as an exhibit.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks timber Rosa de Podia de Aawower

Dors Green Remy Ross Vice President

Harden.

>> Accept it.

>> Thank you. Next move to adopt the

finance of staff, the finance of

council.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks Rosa de Padilla de Aawower Dors

Green Remy Ross Vice President Harden.

>> Adopt it.

>> Thank you. Uh I move to amend this as

the clerk.

>> Clerk, please call the role. Banks Rosa

de Padilla de AWA Dors Green Remy Ross

Vice President Harden

>> amended.

>> Thank you. I now move for passage as

amended. Second clerk,

>> please call the role.

>> Bank Simber Rosa de Padilla de Akawa

Dors Green Remy Ross Vice President

Harden.

>> Pass.

>> Thank you. Next we have ordinance

1033-2026

grant variance provision of section

3353.03 permitted uses 33 uh61.02

permitted uses and 3361.03 development

plan and 3361.04

4B performance criteria. The Columbus

City codes are properly located at 7400

74 7400 Huntington Park Drive to allow a

residential treatment facility with

produced development standards in the

CPD commercial plan development

district. Site consists of one parcel

developed an existing residential

treatment facility. The request of

council variance will legitimize that

existing use. A council variance is

required for the impatient aspect of

this type of facility. A proposal has

approvals from city staff and the far

north Columbus communities coalition. Do

my colleagues and question comments.

Seeing none, I move to accept the entire

staff report and new evidence as an

exhibit.

>> Second.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks timber roa de podia de a doris

green reie ros president.

>> Accept it.

>> Thank you. And next move to adopt the

science of staff, the finance of

council. Second.

>> Cler, please call the role.

>> Banks roa de podia de a doris green remy

ros president Harden.

>> Adopt it.

>> Thank you. And finally, move for

passage. Clerk please call the role.

>> Banks Rosa de Padilla Deakau Dorne Green

Remy Ross vice president Harden

>> passed.

>> Thank you. And next we have ordinance

1034-2026

to grant advance provisions of section

333 2.037 R2F residential district

3312.49 C required parking 333.14 R2 F

area district requirements 3332.19

fronting 3332.21 building lines

3332.25AB

required side yards 3332.27 27 rear yard

and 3332.28

obstructions in required sideyard. The

Columbus City Coast for property located

at 358 East Desler Avenue to allow

residential development with reduced

development standards in the R2F

residential district. Site consists of

four parcels lots A, B, C, and D. Lots A

and C are undeveloped. Lot B is

developed with a two-unit dwelling

proposed to be demolished and lot D is

developed with a four-unit dwelling. The

requested council of variance will allow

two uh allow a new two-unit dwelling on

lots A, B, and C, and will conform the

existing four-unit dwelling on lot D. A

council of variance is required because

the current zoning district allows only

one single or or one two-unit dwelling

per lot, but does not allow for a

fourunit dwelling. Development standards

uh variances for for each lot are also

included in this request. Proposal is

approved from city staff and the

Columbus Southside Area Commission. Do

you want to make colleagues any question

or comments? Seeing none, I move to

accept the staff report into evidence as

an exhibit.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks Timber Rosa de Padilla de AOA Dorn

Green, Remy Ross, Swice, President

Harden.

>> Accept it.

>> Thank you. And next move to adopt the

five steps, the finance of council.

Second.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks Timber Rosa de Padilla de AWA Dors

Green. Remy Ross, Vice President Harden.

>> Adopt it.

>> Thank you. And finally move for passage.

Second. Clerk,

>> please call the role.

>> Banks Timber Rosa de Padilla de AOA Dors

Green Reie Ross Vice President Harden.

Passed

>> eight council president all we have

tonight zoning agenda.

>> Thank you Mr. Chair. Is there a motion

to adjourn?

>> Clerk please call the role.

>> Banks Rosa de Padilla de a Doris Green

Remy Ross vice president Harden

>> meeting is adjourned. I'm also going to

do a little bit more house cleaning or

clean up. Uh, now I'm going to get

Heat. Heat.

Heat.

Heat.

Heat. Heat.

Heat. Heat.

Heat

up

Hey, hey, hey.

Hey,

we are down.

Hey,

hey, hey.

Hey,

hey, hey.

hard. Um, first in the economic

development small minor business

committee, we have ordinance 0636-2026

to amend the 2025 capital improvement

budget to appropriate funds within the

AC Humpco 2 tiff fund, Harrison West

Recreation Park Fund, Wagner Road TIFF

fund, and Wagner Road TIFF capital fund

to transfer funds between the Wagner

Road TIFF fund and Wagner Road TIFF

Capital Fund to transfer funds

respectively within the development

taxable bond fund ACMCO2. to TIFF fund,

Harrison West Recreation Parks Fund,

Wagner Road TIFF Capital Fund, and Rocky

Fork TIFF Capital Fund to authorize the

director of the Department of

Development to enter into a contribution

agreement and restrictive covenant for

the public parking spaces, public

infrastructure improvements, and public

art and placemaking improvements

associated with the greenhouse gravity

project to authorize the expenditure of

$2 million from the development taxable

bond fund, AC Humm TIFF fund, Harrison

West recreation and park fund, Wagner

Road TIFF Capital Fund and Rocky Fork

TIFF Capital Fund to to the Gravity

Project 3 Holdings LLC for the cost of

public parking spaces, public

infrastructure improvements, and public

art and placemaking improvements,

including those incurred prior to the

purchase order pursuant to the four said

contribution agreement with the Gravity

Project 3 Holdings LLC.

Despite the incredibly long title, this

ordinance is quite simple. It is to

appropriate funds for the second of two

capital contributions in support of

phase three of the Gravity development

in Franklin. This third phase of the

Gravity project will provide 50 public

parking spaces, uh, public

infrastructure improvements, public art,

placemaking, and 32 affordable

residential units at or below 80% of the

area median income. This uh the city

approved uh the first of this capital

contribution on November 20th of 2023

and this is the second of those uh

payments uh per the agreement. Are there

any questions or comments from my

colleagues? Seeing none, I move for

passage.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Thanks. Timber Rosa de Padilla Deakau

Doran Green Remy Ross Vice President

Harden

>> passed. And lastly, we have ordinance

1112-2026

to authorize the director of department

of development to enter into a

development agreement with the county of

Franklin, Ohio Confluence Community

Authority and the NWSL Columbus LLC

together with one or more to be

identified affiliates new to finance and

develop certain facilities required by

the National Women's Soccer League

necessary to secure a franchise for

Columbus and to deliver certain

community benefits commit benefits

commitments from new co all in the all

in furtherance of important improvements

to community assets and Columbus'

position as a national leader in women's

sports to authorize the director of

department of development and or

recreation and parks director to enter

into any leases with the confluence

community authority contemplated by the

development agreement for the NWSL teams

training facility to wave the provisions

of chapter 328 of Columbus City Codes to

authorize the director of department of

development to execute a contribution

agreement with the Confluence Community

Authority for the city's capital

contributions towards the training

facility and modifications to the

stadium as contemplated in development

agreement and to authorize the director

of the department of development andor

recreation and parks director to consent

and file such consent with the city

clerk and to add property of the

training facility to the new community

district of the confluence community

authority per Ohio revised code chapter

349. This ordinance uh is yet another

incredibly long title but relates to the

city's attempt to attract a national

women's soccer league team. Uh, as a

recap, the deal is built around a 2% sir

charge on ticketed games and events at

Scott's Miracle Grow Field to raise $25

million for the construction of a

training facility and improvements to

Scott's Miracle Grow Field Stadium. The

city will front the contribution, but it

will be repaid by user fees generated by

stadium activity, including future

women's soccer matches to fund the

expansion. After the debt is repaid, the

city can continue the 2% search charge

in per perpetuity as another revenue

source to fund priorities like human

services, housing, and youth

programming. Uh I know we have several

speakers on this and I do know that uh

led by council president Hardener is an

amendment, but council president, there

are comments before we get to our

speakers.

>> Sure. So, thank you uh Chair Bankston.

Um, and I want to thank the residents

and neighbors, community advocates and

families. Um, I was going to say from

Southwest Columbus, but the truth is,

um, well, I was going to say the entire

city of Columbus. There are some things

that actually break through some

conversations that we have in this

building that pierce into the psyche of

uh, all of our residents. So there I

really cannot I cannot remember a time

uh where another piece of legislation

that we were considering where I would

get stopped at the grocery store as much

as I have on this piece of legislation.

So I understand and appreciate everybody

weighing in. Um as you all know council

was first briefed on the mayor's

national women's soccer league proposal

in February. Essentially the mayor

provided financial and land commitments

to the ownership group that council had

not signed off on. And for the last

month, we've been having a very public

debate about this. A majority of my

colleagues, including myself, opposed

the idea of a $25 million handout to the

ownership. Instead, we renegotiated for

a user fee on tickets at Scott's Miracle

Grow Stadium to fund that commitment. We

made it work for taxpayers, but now we

have to make it work for neighbors. So,

now we're talking about the lease of

McCoy Park to build that site. Many

people in here know that I grew up on

the south side and this actual McCoy

Park is a park that my nephew plays at.

Just last season was playing at McCoy

Park and it's essentially a grassy field

uh right now. And when council members

first learned of this part of the deal,

we were not told that a different plan

from McCoy Park had been promised to the

neighborhood and set aside. I first

learned about that at our April 6

hearing when neighborhood leaders told

us that they were expecting a

groundbreaking on this site. And this is

what really

is crazy. It's not just a park, but

something that designed specifically for

children with differentlyabled

needs and families in an undeserved

underserved part of our city. And it

wasn't just an idea that by November the

city had been provided with technical

plans from a consultant for designs that

they were presented to the community as

a project that was moving forward.

So for months a public park was being

advanced while at the same time it was

being negotiated away and neither

council nor the community was given this

full picture.

That's a breakdown in process that has

resulted in a breakdown in trust. And I

want to be clear, I support bringing

professional women's soccer to the city

of Columbus. I think it is the right

thing to do and I don't want us to miss

out on it. But how you do things matter,

process matters. And honoring

commitments to neighborhoods, especially

underserved neighborhoods, it matters.

And that's why council is stepping in

again now to fix another part of the

deal that we did not create to make it

more responsible and more responsive to

the community. So I want to talk about

what the amendment would do. First, if

we get the team, then the administration

has to form a working group within 15

days and submit a plan to council within

60 days for where else and how we can

build the park that was promised and to

break ground on that same timeline that

the neighbors were expecting.

I have some ideas in mind. and I know my

colleagues do as well, but what we're

not going to do today is announce those

because we're not going to leave the

neighborhood out of this process again.

So, the Southwest Area Commission will

be at the table uh in the working group

to help make that decision. It will

include meaningful public engagement in

that process. So, residents are not in

just informed but actively are shaping

the outcome.

Secondly, I personally negotiated that

the ownership group will donate an

additional $3 million towards this new

park, this new and future park in the

southwest Columbus. This plus other

resources the city had been budgeting

should be enough to fully fund phase one

of the park that was planned.

Third, there will be some public and

community access to portions of the

training complex. recreation and parks

and our community will be able to

utilize some soccer fields and

facilities at the training facility.

And finally, we're going to link real

concrete plans for the park to the

funding for the team. Or other words, if

there are no plans for the park, if

there are no sites uh presented, then

there will be no money.

And this is spelled out in the

legislation. Our goal is to motivate the

administration to move as fast to

deliver for neighbors as they did for

these companies. And I want to be

honest. I'm looking at Miss Liz out

there. This is not the outcome that the

Southwest residents were originally

promised. And we have to be honest about

that.

But I feel a real responsibility now to

make sure that what comes next is done

right and that the community ultimately

receives the kind of park investment

they were led to expect.

Council is working to chart a path

forward in muddy waters. But real

leadership is about clarity,

accountability, and centering community

engagement

because none of this had to happen.

We've done the best that we can in the

past six weeks to fix what the mayor and

his administration should have been

working on for the last six months. The

mayor didn't have to offer up this site

or if he was going to, his team could

have been working since October on an

alternative plan with the neighborhood.

But this the but the first time the

mayor's team engaged the neighborhood

was last Thursday,

four days ago.

That's absurd.

This is what makes people cynical about

public private partnerships about the

Columbus way. Yes, it is good and

necessary for to for the business

community and government to work

together to solve problems to shoot for

the stars. Sure. But it is not

acceptable when the community gets cut

out of the deal. So, I'm proud that this

debate has taken place in public, at

hearings, and at council meetings, not

behind closed doors where only the

wealthy and the well-connected can have

a say. I'm frustrated that the mayor's

negligence put us all of us, council,

the league, the team ownership, and the

neighborhood in this position. And I

will also add

that this process has allowed for

us to be turned against each other.

It really pisses me off because it did

not have to happen this way. It did not

have to happen this way.

But this is the thing. I'm an elected

leader. It is our job to uh it is not

our job to call out problems. Not just

to call out problems, but it is our go

job to fix them. I'm offering these

amendments tonight to try and try to do

that. I believe this New Deal does that

and I will support its passage and so I

look forward to hearing from the

speakers, from my colleagues, from all

those as we are trying to consider this

path forward together. This is not the

original deal. This is not what the

community was promised, but this is what

council what I have brought before

council for consideration to make

to to allow us to still do the big thing

but still honor to the best of our

ability um what was promised to

neighbors. I understand that this is a

moment where no one trusts institutions,

no one trusts government. That's why we

move this process into the public.

That's why this frustration that I'm

sharing, I'm not feigning. This is not a

political stunt. The easiest political

thing for me to do would have been to

vote this thing down. My responsibility

though at the end of the Okay. Well, I'm

talking. My responsibility at the end of

the day is to make sure and to ensure

that the people of the southwest side of

Columbus have a park that is funded and

that folks who are going to advance this

will also pay for it. That is what this

amendment does. Mr. Chair, I'll turn it

back over to you.

>> Uh thank you, uh President Harden. Um we

like as you said, we have several

speakers on this and so we do want to

have more dialogue, I'm sure, to come.

Um it is council's rules that we take

the first three speakers uh both for or

against uh ordinance. I do want to we

take those in order. They came in. So

there I do want to acknowledge that

there were more speakers that signed up

than three and we will make sure that we

acknowledge them. Uh, first up uh to

speak is Miss Liz Reed, followed by DJ

Burns, and then followed by Kelsey Gray.

Chair Reed, welcome back to council. Uh,

you have three minutes.

Good evening, President Harden and

esteemed members of council.

I'm Liz Reed. I'm the voice of the

Southwest Area Commission to Save McCoy

Park.

Today, you are faced with a decision.

Voting yes gives away a public park to

billionaires. Voting no saves McCoy

Park. Your no vote supports families.

Families just like I'm sorry, families

just like Amanda and Iris.

>> ISIS.

>> ISIS. Thank you.

I just met them this evening.

The administration put you in this tough

place. They did not communicate with

anyone other than the owners group.

They before making this deal. They also

did not speak with the National Women's

Soccer League who announced in January

of 2025 they see no reason not to expand

to 30 teams.

The mayor's team was reckless.

This is not our last shot at a team.

Now that the mayor's now the mayor's

office is asking you to hastily sign off

on a bad deal.

They are exploiting your passion for

women's sport and your hope to grow

Columbus to support a package that is

harmful.

You have the power to stop this now.

Despite this amendment, the money

offered by the owners group won't cover

a fraction of the cost to purchase land,

and the money is not due until 2029.

No amendment can materialize land in the

right location for the park.

Ask designers. It is impossible to take

a city plan from McCoy Park and just

plop it somewhere else.

Even if this fast even if this is

fasttracked, the children who now have a

park who now have a park with promised

improvements will be adults before the

park is replaced.

The amendments

changes nothing. You can't vote. You

cannot fix broken legs with a bandage.

Vote yes means you take away from

children with disabilities and families

who are disenfranchised.

You take away an inclusive back

playground. You rob children of a splash

pad. There will be no exclusive pickle

ball or basketball courts. No community

buildings. No walking or rolling paths.

No shel shelters, no picnic tables. If

you vote yes, you support the mayor's

dealings to steal from the very people

you are here to protect. But you

you have the power to save this park.

Vote no.

Stand up for your most vulnerable

residents.

We'll get another chance at a team.

We can do it right next time.

>> The decision calls upon you to get past

the politics of this deal, to see the

real impact on our community.

With your no vote, you have the

opportunity to show Columbus who you

are, what you stand for, and to restore

public trust.

Vote no on ordinance 1112-2026.

Vote no. Save McCoy Park.

>> Can I ask a question?

>> Can I ask a question?

>> Chair Reed. Chair Reed. I think there's

a question for you. Chair Chair Reed, I

have a question.

I if the amendment is approved and the

process moves forward as it is laid out,

do you feel it is reasonable uh to have

the in code in the ordinance

uh uh that that mandates that this

working group has the resources and gets

to uh facilitate all of those things

that you just said it won't have? Do you

think that that is a is that is that the

appropriate place to have that

conversation? And does that give you any

solace that we have we are legislating

that that has to happen with a specific

timeline including keeping the

groundbreaking date that you were

promised?

>> So I looked at the legislation. So all

the timelines don't even start until all

this is negotiated all the way through

from my reading or my understanding of

the amendment. How long will that take?

So we're talking months, weeks before

that's done and then the 60 days start.

So then you start the 60 days and then

you start identifying and then you need

land or property or wherever that's

going to be. Then you need some public

comment or conversation about that. Then

if it's something you need to purchase,

then you need to legislate that. That

takes time. Um it takes time to bring

things to council. It takes time to have

public comment. You can't just purchase

things. Um when you work for a city

because of the auditor office, make sure

that we have due diligence in all of our

pro processes. Um so it takes time to do

all that. So then once you get all of

that done, then what you're talking

about next is a design plan. That design

plan took a year in the making.

But we already had some additional

things coming into that. We own the

land. There was a lot of things. It

takes time. You can't just take all that

work that was done and just plop it

somebody where else. I've I've talked to

designers on this. It just can't happen.

That work will need to be redone. it'll

be need to be redone for whichever

property or land that is located to make

that happen. That will take more time.

So then after that then you've got to

work you got to get the legislation to

make sure that you can start paying for

the work to get done. Um, so it just the

funding then also is not aligned with

when the purchases might need to take

place because we're not getting the the

money um through this agreement

>> paid in full until

>> not paid in full until 2029. And I I'm

not a developer. I don't know how much

it costs for land, but I can't imagine

know knowing that just a small little

house sometimes can cost $3 million. I

can't imagine what property when you're

talking about 30 acres might cost. I

mean, not my house, trust me. Um, but um

it it it cost money to do that. Um and

that upfront money, I don't you know,

are we taking from what we had already

planned in terms of the money in ter

start digging that was supposed to

happen this year to make that happen.

Where's that coming from? You had the

tightest budget from my understanding

you had one of the tightest budget years

this year. And I just as much as we want

to legislate this to fix it, I just

don't think we can.

>> No, that's fair. I want to start you the

right first thing you brought up was a a

a good point. We have in the amendment

that we would pull this working group

together 15 days after we win the team.

The reason we said that was if we don't

get the team, you know, then but but to

but to your point though, I think that

the the community deserves a table

regardless if we get this team or not.

Uh because uh trust was broken and trust

has to be rebuilt around a table. Um I I

won't ask for that to be an amendment in

this piece of legislation, but I I am

looking at Director Ree and I have a

line of questions for Director Ree.

Regardless, it is council's expectation

that in 15 days we start pulling

together all of these partners. Anyways,

uh regardless, secondly, you made a

point that was a really good point. Uh

you are a former city employee. You know

the speed of government, but as I said

in my statement, we saw the speed of

public private partnerships. This thing

didn't exist six months ago. And if six

months the public and private sector

could come up and put together a whole

site plan and do all of this stuff

in this legislation, I'm holding the

government and our private partners

accountable that they too should move at

the same pace that they did for these

companies. And so I I I I 100% uh

understand and see I'm just um trying to

do my best to be honest, to be open and

transparent about a process and hold

folks accountable because

the proc what was given to you was a

broken promise from the administration.

Now this would be our promise. This

would be council's promise. And I'd be

damned if I let that down. We you Okay,

I I'll stop.

>> So, I just want to

So, the reason So, McCoy Park has been a

sticking point. Um the owners group does

not want to give it up. There's a reason

the and I can't speak for them, but

there's at least one reason that I'm

aware of that they would not want to

give it up. It's because it's already

there. It's already purchased. The city

owns it. It's easy to just It's, you

know, a flat piece of land where you can

just make it happen.

So to try to the reason they don't want

to give it up is because it takes more

work to try to find another piece of

land that can do that same thing that

has those same that same functionality.

It takes time to then purchase it. It

takes time to then once you purchase it

start doing the surveying, start doing

all the other work that needs to go into

a plan. Um so they want us to delay as

opposed to the team to delay. So in in

doing that they are taking away a city

park and it will take us longer than it

will than it took them to make this

happen because we don't have identified

land that will make this work.

>> Thank you.

>> I'm not chair.

>> Yes.

>> Joe Matil, please.

>> Council member Green.

>> Thank you, Chair Bangston. And um thank

you, Chair Reid. Um, I just wanted to

get a sense of based on your knowledge

of, you know, kind of the community in

the surrounding area. Um, so not only is

it going to take time, uh, to acquire

new land to build the park that was

promised, but this current parcel is

already being used continuously. I've

talked to many people who have sports

teams that play there. Um so for the

next two years while if this plan were

to move forward in its current form um

while they the park is closed off to the

public and they're constructing this

training facility and we are also in the

process of trying to find a new park to

replace it and then build the rec center

and all the things that were agreed to

over this next two years when that

parcel is off the table while all of

that is in process. Where will the kids

in your community go for recreation?

>> They don't have a place.

>> That's that's the problem. Um this is

one of the most

um disadvantaged areas in the city of

Columbus. So much so that they have the

lowest life expectancy in the state.

um they don't grow, they don't become

seniors, you know, they don't become as

old as I do on average.

>> Yeah.

>> Um

so to take this parcel and not consider

other places and take just a little bit

more time to find the right spot for

this team so we can make a proposal that

we can all come around and support

because we love women's soccer. We love

soccer and we love women's sports and

you combine those together. Columbus

supports that. And I just who should be

waiting for the right piece of land?

Who gets disadvantaged? And in the

meantime, if it is given away, you have

disadvantaged people who have no park.

They can't walk their dog. They can't

they'll have no place to do those

things. And that's not just for the

time. If we can't find another piece of

land somewhere close by, then they don't

have a place ever for that. It's not

just temporary.

>> Um I mean another example of that is

what happened with the ex with the um

the historical crew stadium. So there

was a lot of promises made by the city

saying that

we would find something near, you know,

we try to redevelop this and when that

couldn't happen, they worked on

different things trying to find

something that would work. Well, the

Kilborn Sports

Kilborn Run Sports Center is an amazing

complex. Like it's amazing, but it's a

17inute drive from the neighborhood that

was impacted by that decision.

>> And that's what I'm afraid will happen

here, that the land just won't show up

and it won't happen and we can't make it

happen. And then as time goes on, we

forget how important this is. So, what

I'm So, what I'm hearing you say is that

not only is this an issue of us walking

away from this beautiful complex that

was planned to be built in your

neighborhood in phases, so you would

still have access to the to the

amenities of the park right now. Yes.

>> But also, with the loss of this park,

there is no alternative to serve the

community until a new site is found.

>> Correct.

>> Thank you.

Um, thank you. And I know that there

will be um more

I know that there will be uh more

questions. Uh, Miss Reed, so stick

around just in case folks have

questions. I do have one. I'm going to

probably toss Director Reese uh really

quickly or maybe even you chair can

speak to this. You know, the current

park as it sits is really more utilized,

I think, for sporting activities, little

league football and soccer. From my

understanding, the park that was to be

developed, all of those fields go away.

So, do we have a phasing plan of where

those teams go to play, I'm not sure how

they play, but the the the park design

itself shrinks the number of fields. So,

do we account for where that volume of

people go is what my question is.

>> So, Chair Bankston, um, currently the

teams that play at McCoy, a lot of them

are bust in. Um they're busted in from

different community centers. Um our

staff drive those buses,

they participate, they go home.

>> Okay.

>> Um we had already planned to do games at

Kilbornne.

This is prior to any knowledge of

anything. We had already planned to move

those games over to Kilborn.

>> Okay. Thank you for that clarity. I just

wanted to make sure.

>> Um, thank you. Thank Thank you, Miss

Reed. Again, I'm sure you'll stick

around. So, if there's questions, we'll

call you back up if folks have

>> M Reed.

>> Um, DJ Burns is next, followed by Kelsey

Gray.

My name is DJ Burns. I run the Brewster.

The wages for my past sins are having to

spend time fraternizing with the worst

people alive at our Republican

jerrymandered state house. It's

debilitating to my mentals to watch

gangs of surirly rule grandfathers

storm into rooms and stomp on our most

vulnerable citizens while they reward

the corporate interests and ultra

wealthy donors that control them. But,

you know,

I just realized in this entire deal, at

least when they're pissing on my face,

they're not throwing around words like

equity and opportunity because we expect

this from the Republican party. And

hell, I expect this from our beautiful

mayor,

but we should never expect it nor accept

it from so-called progressive leaders of

the Democratic Party.

the NWSL

to Columbus plan, even with this new

amendment, it's not good enough. And I

applaud you guys for shaking some

pennies out of a billionaire crook like

Jimmy Hasslam. But it falls short when I

look up to the suburban wasteland of

Brook Park who's shaking them down for

25 million to cover the infrastructure

costs of their cyber truck of a stadium

that they're building in their city. And

this is the mighty Columbus. and we're

going home with $3 million.

It's not good enough. And this idea that

it's got to move quickly is another lie

being told. There is no deadline. These

people want 30 teams in their league.

Are we going to do this right or are we

going to snap our fingers for the the

almighty

public private partnership and guys like

Jimmy Hasslam and the and the Vake

Ramosami who they're holding a

fundraiser for literally 72 hours from

now. a stones throw over your river.

This city will never reach its potential

until we beat the huta at the state

level. I'm up there every day. And this

city is never going to beat that huta if

we continue to do things the Columbus

way. If we continue to hand out to these

corporations to snap our fingers for a

nationwide and these CEO crooks who are

unaccountable because last I checked we

elected you guys to shepherd economic

prosperity. We elected you guys to act

as checks on this corporate greed that

is now going to screw over disabled

people.

So don't piss on my face and call it

opportunity. I get enough of that at the

state house. And if we're going to ever

change, if we're ever going to like be

the city that we want to be, then have

some decency. I believe in the decency

of all you people. I'm not comparing you

to Republicans, although you're acting

like them. I believe in the decency of

you people. But if this is the way we're

going to go,

if this is the path we're going to go

down,

then maybe, just maybe, I go out, I get

a thousand signatures, and I throw my

hat into the ring for the mayoral race

and show you guys what an honest to God

campaign for the people and the streets

looks like. Thank you.

>> Thank you. Um,

Mr. Burns. Next is uh Kelsey Gray.

>> Welcome back to council. Uh you have

three minutes.

>> Thank you.

>> I'm a teacher in Columbus City Schools

and I live in District 7. And last week,

my students used this piece of

legislation as a case study. They used

public record to analyze both sides of

the argument. 61 of them engaged civily

with you by writing you letters. I'm

here to read nine of them and I made you

copies for each and every member of your

own to take home and read on your own

time.

I'm going to read the first one in total

and then a bridge the rest. Dear Council

Member Shannon Harden, my name is

Manasse and I'm a 16-year-old boy and I

attend Independence High School. I am

writing to you to let you know that I

think that the people of Franklin

deserve that park they got promised. The

people of Franklin are already

struggling due to the highways and

pollution also not having a lot of green

areas. So, this park could really help

the people. There is no way that the

people of Franklin should have an

18-year life expectancy less than the

rest of the city. And also, there is no

reason to be giving money to the ones

that have an abundant amount as it is. I

hope you read this letter and take it

into consideration. I hope you have a

great rest of your day. He wrote to you

because you are his representative.

Dear Columbus City Council, my name is

Osara and I'm a senior in high school. I

think you should keep your word and

build this park. I grew up in a small

town called Pokeypsy, New York. When we

were on summer break, we would stay home

with our while our parents would work.

The time my mom would come home after

work, she would take us to one of the

few parks we had. When I tell you guys

it was probably the best time of my

life, we would run and play at the

playground. That's all kids want. Kids

need a park near home. This will leave a

mark in a kid's life and they'll have in

their memories for the rest of their

lives. I'm sure a woman's soccer

facility can be built anytime, but a

kid's memory cannot be replaced.

Dear Columbus City Council, my name is

Terrell and I go to Independence High

School. I feel like y'all should build

the park. You already promised it to the

people. That should be the end of the

story. The park will bring the kids

together and give them something to do.

In Delaware, Ohio, there's a park called

MIGO. I will move there just for the

park. Reason is it would keep me out of

trouble or from just doing dumb kid

things. Dear Columbus City School,

sorry, dear Columbus City Council, I'm

against giving billionaires money to

build something. Giving them more money

is like pouring water into the ocean.

Dear Columbus City Council, my name is

Alisonan and I want to start off by

saying please don't be dumb. You guys

are adults and now have the chance to do

big things for our community. So while

you do it, please make adult choices. I

play soccer for Sporting Columbus and I

enjoy the sport. What I do not enjoy is

you using the money that we worked hard

for on a women's soccer facility. Maybe

be smart and spend the money on

something that can help this terrible

school system. Spend the money on the

people that make the money. Dear

Columbus City Council, my name is

Stormmy. I'm a student at Independence

High School. I don't think, but I know

that giving 50 million to billionaires

to build a facility that will have

little to no benefit to our community is

absurd. The money that is supposed to be

used to uplift our community is being

used in the wrong way. I only have two

more. Can I read them briefly? Thank

you. Dear council member, my name is

David. I go to Independence High School.

I would like for you to vote against

Columbus City Columbus City building the

stadium. The location already doesn't

have enough greenery. To take the last

bit would be cruel to the community.

Columbus City has already promised the

community a better park with more

greenery and activities. They should

keep their promise. Lying not only ruins

the city's trust and reliability, but it

just sets a reputation in general.

Dear Columbus City Council, my name is

David and I vote for the city council to

keep their word and build the new park

for the neighborhood because the

Hasslams already have enough money. Why

give more money to a billionaire when

there's homeless people out there

struggling without shelter? Another

reason is when food stamps were shut

down last year, many people were mad and

they still are actually because they

were expecting to get the food stamps

and they still haven't got them. No one

gets food stamps and my mom doesn't get

them either and she's just out there

struggling. So, you could use that money

to give food stamps to people who need

it.

Thank you.

Thank you. Um,

Mr.

I also wanted to again say that we had

um our rule is that we had three

speakers against something three

speakers for, but we did have more

speakers to sign up. So I do want to

acknowledge that Jennifer Kraton and

also Joe Motiel signed up

>> uh to speak again. Thank you again um

>> Miss Gray. Now we will hear from uh

speakers uh who are proponents. Uh first

up is and I apologize if I get this

wrong. Gaya Castati or Cassat

you go.

Thank you. Welcome to council. come on

up to the podium.

Please correct my pronunciation and you

have three minutes.

>> Good evening.

>> Good evening.

>> First, I want to say thank you to city

council president Harden and city

council members for the opportunity to

speak to you all today. My name is Gaia

Casati,

very close. I grew up right here in

Columbus, Ohio, uh, north side Columbus,

and I currently live in King Lincoln. My

family and I immigrated here a very long

time ago, and we chose to lay our roots

here in Columbus to find our sense of

belonging here in Columbus. And I

believe one of the best ways we were

able to do that was through sports. My

siblings and I played sports in school

for the rec centers in our neighborhoods

with our friends and strangers who would

become our friends.

It was never about the game for me. It

gave me a lot more than that. It was an

opportunity for a young girl who felt

like a fish out of water, to feel

confident, to learn to communicate with

others, to

learn discipline, and honestly to stay

out of trouble.

In fact, I continue to play sports on an

adult wreck team, not professional at

all, for all the same reasons today.

You might have seen my young daughter

with me earlier, Maya. And if you didn't

see her, you definitely heard her.

As a mother now raising a daughter in

the same city, I start to truly truly

value and think about the environment

that she's growing up in.

I want her to see what's possible for

her. I want her to look up to

entrepreneurs like her mom. I'm an

attorney and I'm a law firm owner.

I want her to have women in law to look

up to, women in tech and women in

leadership positions. And I believe that

Columbus does a wonderful job of that

already. I can speak from experience

because I have some of the best mentors

right here in Columbus.

But I want her to have something else

that I did not have, which is women in

sports. And let me clarify,

it's women competing at the highest

level possible right here in her own

city. I would love for her to find that

in Columbus versus having the need to

travel elsewhere to find that kind of

inspiration and representation.

I want her to be able to dream big and

then I want her to dream even bigger

than that.

Bringing a National Women's Soccer

League team to Columbus again is never

about just sports.

It's about representation,

about community, and about giving young

girls and young boys something powerful

to believe in. Look, Columbus has

already proven that we're a city that

show shows up. We show up in support of

our teams. We invest in our future. We

lead in innovation. I mean, even

artificial intelligence. We're not

afraid to compete against powerhouses in

Silicon Valley.

So I ask, why not lead in this too?

Why not be the city that sets the

standard for all sports, including

women's sports?

I'm an attorney. I believe in justice as

well, and I believe that this amendment

is a sufficient way to achieve justice

in light of the circumstances.

I'm also a mother of a daughter in this

city, and I believe in a better future.

I support this initiative and I urge you

all to do the same. Thank you.

>> Thank you.

>> Any questions?

Thank you for your testimony.

Um, next we will have Mark Wise followed

by Doug Wolf.

President Harden and members of council.

My name is Mark Wise and I am the owner

of the Columbus Eagles FC. We are

currently the highest level soccer

women's soccer in Columbus. Um maybe a

very well-kept secret, but that's just

because we're small. Um, I had some

things prepared, but I'm going to change

that a little bit tonight because I want

to tell you just real quickly. Um,

you're looking at a guy that has been a

woman's a advocate for I don't know 30

years. I had two daughters that I I I

raised and they ended up being athletes.

And for a guy my age, I remember growing

up in a time when women didn't play

sports without getting made fun of. So

somewhere along the way I I fell in love

with women's sports through my daughters

and my youngest daughter asked me to be

a soccer coach and from that it turned

into 30 years of being a a women's

soccer coach uh 19 years of a high

school soccer coach and a real love for

the women's national team. And when they

were in the uh World Cup in 1999, I

experienced

70,000 people watching women play

soccer. And it was crazy. It was crazy

for me. But I look forward to having

professional women's soccer in Columbus

so I could come watch. And the first

goound they had, they didn't even think

about Columbus. Three years later, they

failed. Three years after that, they

came with a second league. And I said,

'Of course they'll come to Columbus.

Columbus is where it's it's at. You you

don't you have to know how many women

are playing soccer in Columbus. How many

girls are playing soccer in Columbus?

How how many uh uh ladies that we send

to division one, division 2, division

three schools from Columbus. And I said,

I need to be able to watch it in

Columbus. Second time they said no.

Third time NWSL came around and I said

certainly they'll come into Columbus.

That time didn't happen. went to my went

to my uh uh coach's uh clinic at some

point. I was complaining. They said,

"Mark, you need to do something." I

said, "I don't have the money to do

something." But in 2013, I put down

$6,000 to start the Columbus Eagles. The

objective was to help de uh develop

women's soccer in Columbus so that we

could have at some point a professional

uh club in in town. There's just so many

benefits and I I don't have the time to

list them all. So many benefits for

these young ladies who used to go to the

the crew uh clinics and see all the boys

saying, "Hey, I could be a professional

one day." And the little girl said,

"Well, what's in it for me?" And there

wasn't anything. And I wanted to help

make that happen. Now, it isn't my it

isn't me. I wasn't able to make it

happen. But we do have some people are

willing to make that happen today. and I

fully support what they're trying to do

because it's going to benefit women and

that's what I've been about. Thank you

for your time tonight.

>> Thank you. Um thank you Mr. Wise for

your testimony. Thank you.

>> Uh uh last speaker is Doug Wolf.

Doug, welcome to council and you have

three minutes.

Thank you, uh, Council President Harden.

Uh, members of council, thank you for

the opportunity to speak this evening.

I'm Doug Wolf, president and CEO of

Adaptive Sports Connection. First, thank

you for your continued investment in

Adaptive Sports and in people with

disabilities across our great city. At

Adaptive Sports Connections, we work

every day with individuals with

disabilities and their families to

provide access to recreation and sport.

For many of the families we serve, that

does not happen automatically. It

happens because someone chooses to

create opportunity. Invest in inclusion

and build the support and community that

make participation possible.

At ASC, I work alongside Q Hannes. Q is

a 2023 USA Ampute Soccer World Cup

silver medalist. I've seen what it takes

to overcome barriers and excel in

adaptive sport. I've seen a father

discover he could play alongside his son

with autism through adaptive recreation.

I've seen a 95-year-old veteran with

vision impairment smile like a child

skiing for the first time. Those moments

stay with you because they show you what

becomes possible when access is real.

And this is why I'm here tonight. I

believe bringing a National Women's

Soccer League team to Columbus and the

proposed development at McCoy Park can

expand access and opportunity for people

with disabilities. We have already seen

what this can look like through the

Columbus crew. We have seen real

investment in access for people with

disabilities and others who've been too

often left out. Thanks to investments

made by the crew, Columbus is home to

GOAT, the greater Ohio ampute soccer

team. Blind soccer and gold ball

programming have expanded and direct

investments have also been made to

organizations like adaptive sports

connection that provide adaptive

recreational opportunities beyond

soccer, supporting well-rounded

opportunities for adaptive sport and

recreation in the city of Columbus. In

my previous role at Boys and Girls Club

of Central Ohio, I saw the same kind of

investment open doors for young people

who may not have otherwise had access to

these kinds of experiences.

So when I think about what an NWSL team

could mean for Columbus, I think more

about access, more opportunity, more

moments of belonging, and more people in

this community.

I also want to acknowledge the concerns

that have been raised. The potential

loss of public land matters. The promise

of inclusive space matters. Access in

this community should not be diminished.

From my perspective, this is the

standard. This project should expand

access, not reduce it. And I believe it

can. And from our standpoint at Adapted

Sports Connection, we are ready to

partner in that work because we've

already seen what happens when

investment moves beyond good intentions

into real action. I believe Columbus can

get this right. Thank you.

>> Thank you, D.

Um and and again just wanted to

acknowledge that there were other

speakers. Again, we only take three,

four and three against, but want to just

acknowledge that Lori uh Walker and

Vanessa Savage also signed up to speak

in favor. I'm going to move into some uh

questioning. I know that there's

probably be other questions from my

colleagues. Uh I I just want to start

off with uh Director Stevens. Uh,

director, I think one of the big things

we have heard and I think continue to

heard is this idea of the urgency of the

bid and uh that council can reject this

deal uh and submit a new bid

at a future site. Can you just speak to

the knowledge that you have of kind of

the timeline

why this expansion opportunity is the

most advantageous and critical?

>> Yep. Thank you, uh, President Harden,

Chair Banks, and members of council.

It's really important to remember that

the ownership group is putting together

a bid to get an expansion NWSL franchise

to make that bid as attractive as

possible to the league. We've engaged

with the ownership group to show that

public private partnership component of

it.

We know when we the mayor first met with

the commissioner of the NWSL

they were considering two expansion

league teams in the league. They have

announced one in Atlanta. So we know at

the current time they are considering

another expansion team for the immediate

future and they're that's the bid that

was put together and that's this deal is

a component of that bid to show the um

support around the community to attract

this team. So, we know time is of the

essence because the league is looking to

add a second team that will start in the

2028 season. So, they need to get to a

decision point in the near future. So,

whoever whatever community is awarded a

team can start the process to put a team

in place to meet the timeline of a 2028

season.

>> Uh, thank you for that, director. And I

think you said there that the mayor did

have a conversation with the

commissioner to NWSL. Uh but also want

to clarify, you know, we the city is not

looking to buy the team, right? This is

about a package uh that we have put

forth to uh the NWS sale for the bid. Is

that the best way to frame this? And I

also want to say this too. I think I I

believe that we're in a good position,

but we don't know yet if in fact we

would win the team. So, Chair Bankston,

the franchise is being pursued by a

private ownership group. There's a 300

plus million dollar capital investment

required to secure a expansion

franchise. The city's component of this

is a um investment, shared investment in

the training facility as part of the

public private partnership. So really um

we're we're a component of the overall

deal that is being pursued by the

ownership group and working with the um

the league.

>> Thank you for that. And then just one

question for um uh director Ree and then

I want to of course open up to my

colleagues. uh director I think around

this idea and what makes this difficult

for even me uh and I think I've been

supported from the very beginning uh was

the this revelation about McCoy Park and

what it was to be used for right

adaptive uh uses can you talk about how

is this this is expanding right adaptive

use facilities that we have we have

other adaptive use facilities around the

city and um we're committed to that

could you just talk to where those

facilities exist, what that commitment

looks like uh as a city.

>> Chair Bangston, um our therapeutic

program when we talk about adaptive

sports, um we actually have the SB

adaptive sports complex. Um last week we

just held a regional uh botchi

tournament. And so uh that's one

facility. During our summer we hold a

therapeutic camp at three locations. Um,

and so when you talk about what would

take place uh at McCoy Park, uh, it

would have been just a number of fields,

soccer fields, um, not just soccer

fields, but basketball, pickle ball. Um,

but I want to just say one thing and

that is our core priority in our

department has always been to serve the

community. Um, we have not stopped doing

that and will not stop. It's our

priority to make sure that the Southwest

community has a park. We are in talks

working with people. We are out looking

at properties. Um, our team was out this

weekend looking at things and there are

park or I would say land in the area

that we possibly could look at and that

does not exclude McCoy but it gives us

an opportunity to say that yes we will

keep our promise to that community. Um,

that is really really important to us.

Uh, we held community meetings to make

sure that that planning was put

together. I hear you, President Harden,

when you say joining a group with the

planning of the community, that is

something we can do. It's something we

did do and it's something that we will

continue to do. And so I don't want

council to think that this is something

that we will sit on. We will move

swiftly. we will move rapidly to ensure

that that community has a park

>> and director to that point I think I

heard you just say identifying sites and

I know that's underway uh but more

importantly I think some of those

amenities specific to uh adaptive use

>> is that where we're still all do you

believe that there's sites that would

accommodate those things in particular I

think

what I heard even I think from last week

from some of my colleagues that it's not

just simply about the sports piece of

it. It's the other components right at

the playground and splash pad and these

other amenities

um that would accommodate uh that

community. Uh is that something that is

feasible with you know just a bird's eye

view of what we have found uh on that

side of town?

>> I do believe so. Um, we have something

we're looking at that uh the acreage it

would fit within that plan. Um, yes, Liz

Reed is right. Um, would we have go to

go back to design? Yes. Um, does that

take long? We're already starting this

process. So, we're not just sitting

around. We're trying to move as rapidly

as we can. Um, and so, but we also want

to make sure that the community is

involved. And one thing that we said is

until the team has been formed um we

have to wait because we want the

feedback of the community.

>> Yeah.

>> Uh thank you for that. Uh any my

>> just keep that line of questioning going

>> Joe Matil.

>> Okay. Well then sign up and say

something right now I'm speaking and

trying to get a park for the folks of

the southwest Columbus. I

>> director Ree.

>> Yes.

>> So, we council um we've been hearing

conflicting information about the park

that council members were first briefed

on this deal in February. We were told

that there was never ending funding for

the concept, but then the dispatch

reported on a very detailed uh design

plan that was produced in November.

a month after this uh was offered to the

NWSL site and then neighborhood informed

us that they were expecting a

groundbreaking in 2026. My question is

what is true here? What was the timeline

for how much funding is available to

build the therapeutic recreation park at

McCoy? And and where I'm going with

this, I think it is building off of uh

Council Bankson's line of questioning,

trying to understand what is actually

available, what we can afford, and what

this additional $3 million can do to

help move this process along in an

expedited way.

>> Um, President Harden, when we started

design, we did start design, but we also

stopped the design. Once we found out

there was uh a plan going for McCoy, we

stopped the design. So there are there

is a balance of about $450,000

left. Um when you talk about the budget

for construction

um that budget for construction is in

our regular annual um CIP budget which

would be 6 million. Um, with that six

million, we were about 2 million short.

And so, we were trying to look at where

do we get those two millions from to

complete the project. Um, and that would

come this year, that 6 million.

>> So, so we heard from Miss Liz or Chair

Reed um, regarding the 15 days after us

getting the team and the 60 days for us

to have a plan.

I I I think I mean I think I had that

conversation with with chair Reed

before. Um the push back I would have to

we had to wait till we get the team is

>> no

>> we're we're already working from behind

now.

>> Can you tell me with full faith how you

would move this thing forward in an

expedited manner? I am making a promise.

Matter of fact, we are legislating

specifically timelines that are more

aggressive than anything that we have

have have moved uh before. How will you

make that happen? If I vote for this,

>> President Harden, um the the good thing

about it is the specifications for um

the courts, the fields, that doesn't

change. And so it does mean that um when

we're looking at land, what what we find

um to find something that uh is clear as

possible that we could go in rapidly. Um

it has to be legislated before our

commission before it comes to council.

Um we're already speaking about what

does that look like even in May. um can

it can it be done to our commission

because it has to go to our commission

first. Um so we're already starting to

look at the possibilities of how do we

move how do we make things still take

place this year as far as a

groundbreaking.

>> Thank you.

>> Yeah. And just I want to put a final

point on that um director and that's

where I'm but you said the

specifications

of the splash pad and the courts and

what have you. That's the specifications

to build that for adaptive use, right?

The site plan that we've picked that may

change, but the specifications of what

was designed for that use, those are

done and that's what will help this move

with speed. Is that how I'm hearing when

you say specifications?

>> That is correct. And so it's just um a

wider plan. It's wider uh area, playing

area. Um, even the playground would be a

wider playing area that's for wheelchair

accessibility. Um, and ensuring that

it's an inclusive uh, play area for all

individuals.

>> Thank you. Other other members, Council

Member Green,

>> thank you so much, Chair. Um, Director

Ree, can you help me understand? So I I

think you said that

the or or we understand that the design

for the park was released to the

community in November.

Um but you said that you stopped

designing the park when you h as you

said when you learned there was another

plan going on for the park. And so I

guess I'm just trying to understand at

what point exactly did Wreck and Parks

stop doing design for the park? And at

what point maybe

did you um have an idea that there was

another plan going on for the park?

>> So towards the end of the year is when

we stop the and there's several types of

drawings. Um what we haven't completed

is the construction drawing. And so when

we talk about that plan, that's that

construction plan. Um, but it was

towards the end of the year. Don't

recall exactly, but I knew it was

towards the end of year.

>> Okay.

>> Um, and, uh, Director Stevens, question

for you.

um what conversations were happening

internally um you know between maybe

your team and the mayor and director Ree

about if this project were to move

forward

what we would do in response to support

the community when did you guys start

talking about finding a replacement site

or um the need to

move on something like that

>> um thank you council member Green. Uh we

started

fall, I'd say probably early November,

end of October, uh with internal

discussions I know with my colleague

Director Ree on the potential

opportunity in the potential location.

We talked through some of the challenges

around how do we um move forward with

the some of the programming that's

already been identified down there and

how do we solve that and and find other

locations to still deliver on that. Um

it was I I think there was a little of a

chicken and egg conversation on um

how far out in front to get when there

was still a lot of work to be done

whether or not we could even get a deal

where the community um that public

private partnership could come in place

that could be part of the bid. And then

there's still the um final piece of

actually securing or winning or having

the ownership group win the bid for the

franchise. So uh I'd say fourth quarter

of 25 we were having those conversations

and I know in first quarter of 26 um the

development and wreck and park teams

were having conversations on where do we

start thinking and looking to identify

uh additional land for park space.

Thanks,

>> Council Member. Um, Backup.

>> Thank you, Council Member Bangston.

>> I'm sure no one's surprised that I'm

still angry about this.

>> I am angry that we're even considering

that we give public park to

billionaires.

I'm angry that the administration worked

secretly for months on a deal. Heck, I

chair Rick and Parks and I heard nothing

about this.

We should working secretly on a bill on

a deal that gives billionaires what they

want while requiring an underserved

community to make a huge sacrifice and

give up their green space and a new park

that was going to break ground this

year. I'm angry that this deal was

dumped on council in February and we're

the ones trying to fix it. That's

unconscionable. I commend my colleagues

for their efforts to ensure that

taxpayers aren't funding this and the

community eventually gets something out

of it. My vote is not about their

efforts. I'm furious about the

administration's attitude that the

Southwest community shouldn't mind

giving up their new community park that

would also serve the disabled because

the NWSL deal is so great for other

people. Bottom line,

undererved communities should not have

to be the ones making the sacrifice so

billionaires can take a public park.

Instead of giving away a public park and

telling an underserved community to wait

because eventually they'll get something

else, the administration should have

told the billionaires to pay their own

way.

>> I have not waited through this much BS

since I mucked out stalls in a cow barn

as a 4 kid. This is ridiculous.

Uh thank you council member and just

want to uh thank say that it's real and

not only your passion for this but your

passion for recreation and parks in that

department uh and how you lead. Uh I

will say too that again as someone who

was supportive of this and learning

about the park um I too was extremely

frustrated uh and angry by it. But I

definitely I think I went into solution

mode immediately and started looking at

sites and working with our real estate

division. So again, I want to thank uh

this body and my colleagues again for

leaning in on this amendment uh that we

got to today and trying to at least I

think come to a win-win where we can

deliver a park and do both in this

moment. But again, thank you for uh your

continued leadership and advocacy around

recreational parks because it is very

very real. It is very very real. Uh any

other questions of the administration or

folks before we before I potentially

move for passage?

>> I'm just now we we'll have time for

comments beforehand, but

>> I'll give comments, but I just I have a

question. At at what point

was the community going to be notified

about this?

Was there ever was there ever a plan?

So, if it's okay, council member, I'll

I'll start. Um,

in the process in working through this

deal, you our intent was to finalize the

the deal that we worked on with the

ownership group, brief council, and then

take it out to the community. So, the

the timeline of making sure we had a a

deal in place of what we were putting

forward that could be captured in the

ownership group bid and then it's it's

the engagement after the briefing. So,

we started with city council in February

and and moving forward from there.

>> Do you think that's a little backwards?

So, council member, um,

it without having a deal in place,

briefing

council or the community on something

that wasn't didn't didn't exist, wasn't

real at the time. It it was that was the

challenge from from my perspective. So,

you know, that was

>> the park wasn't

>> the the park wasn't concrete, but we

were still dealing with the community.

It sounds like for up to seven years we

were prior to

>> at what point were you going to tell a

community that you were working with for

seven years that this was no longer on

the table and that this park had been

offered up for something else.

>> And like were you allowed to like what?

So normally our process is to sit talk

to the community and find out what is it

that we can do. Um what is it that they

want? What are we looking for? How do we

work together? um when the plan came um

we still don't know and there's nothing

concrete and so that's why this is even

more difficult because when you talk

about McCoy um I hear people saying that

it's it's it's nothing but we don't know

we don't know what is there what we do

know is we're going to work with the

community we're going to work with the

ownership

and there may be something at McCoy It

may not,

but we already have some things in place

to move forward, but it's still meeting

with the community and that's when and

if the team is selected for the city of

Columbus and at that point in time, we

will do community meetings to ensure

that the involvement of the community is

priority.

>> Thank you. Council

member White,

>> sorry, just a quick followup, right?

Because obviously at some point in time

we stopped the planning on this park.

Is it even possible that we were

actually going to hit that timeline for

groundbreaking given that we would have

to do some additional designs from

stopping and starting?

>> Um, we would have hit the groundbreaking

um

>> the construction of the actual park. So

the

>> or the first phase

>> the groundbreaking of the first phase

which was stopped end of year.

>> Yeah.

>> What was in what was involved in the

first phase?

>> So everything outside of the building is

involved in phase one and the building

is phase two.

But again, and

would we have still hit the timeline

that the community assumed we were going

to get if you stopped planning in

November?

>> Correct. We would have.

>> You would have.

>> Yes.

>> Okay. Thank you, director.

>> I have a followup to what Council Member

Ross asked you because

you guys, we talk about notifying the

public. When were you going to notify

us?

you you no one let us know this was an

issue until this community came to us to

tell us that all this work had been done

and promises had been made. So when were

you going to tell us outside of the

public outside of the public bringing it

to us?

Um, Council Member Reie, I appreciate

that question and I will um accept full

responsibility of my inability to

communicate kind of what was in place

and how it was discussed with the

community. That is on me and um it

wasn't intentional, but it was poorly

communicated on my part.

I I guess I guess what I'm so confused

about though is that there seemed to be

a lot of communication with external

stakeholders. I'm I'm truly impressed at

the massive effort to the amount of

emails through this form, the amount of

commercials, the amount of

advertisements that have hap that are

everywhere you go. Like that does not

happen overnight. We know how to

communicate with people. We know how to

get in touch with people. And so I just

don't understand how it is possible or

acceptable or you know how this could

have occurred in this way. Um

I guess that's more of a statement than

a question. I'm not going to make you

respond to it unless you would like to.

I it's it's just it's very um I I think

I I've been thinking so much lately

about what if we mobilized people in the

same way that we did around this soccer

team around ending hunger. Can you

imagine if we had a massive astroturf

campaign? Can you imagine the amount of

movement we could have as a city if we

put that much energy and momentum and

power and money behind a campaign to end

homelessness in our community. It's

impressive the way that we have been

able to contact so many people about

this process and then but the but the

most important stakeholders

just somehow got missed. Um,

>> any further questions? I think I'm going

to to move. I think I'm going to I think

there's something wrong with my

microphone. I'm usually the loudest one.

I think there's something wrong with my

mic. I'm like literally like in the mic.

Um,

uh, again, I'm going to move for the

amendment at this at this point in time

and really, uh, appreciate the, uh, the

dialogue. Yes.

>> I I will move.

>> Yes, I'll do that after the amendment

for the final vote. Um for members u and

again just as a reminder of uh the

amendment and we and how we got here and

again want to thank council president

Harden for introducing this amendment

and getting us here that it does uh a

couple things, right? one, it

establishes uh this timeline uh to form

a working group that includes the

southwest area commission that's in the

legislation to ensure that uh that the

community is involved in that process.

We put timelines that that will be 15

days uh once we are awarded team that

then group is to come back to this body

with 60 within 60 days of a plan of

action of either sites identified or how

we uh proceed forward to deliver on the

specific things that were in McCoy Park.

Additionally, again, thanks to council

president, uh there will be a $3 million

commitment from uh the ownership group

uh to the recreation and parks

foundation to aid in the development of

that park. I want to be clear that that

is for the development of the park. It

is not solely for land acquisition. I

think there's fungeable dollars there to

be able to do that, but it is for the

development of uh the park. Uh I think

that with those amendments in addition

to uh the other changes that I mentioned

at the top of where we got to this deal

of how we even finance it with council,

that is how I was able to get here uh

and be supportive. Uh so with that, I'm

going to first introduce uh the

amendment and ask for a passage by the

amendment by voice. Then we'll ask for

final comments from my colleagues as I

ask for the final vote. Um uh so first

on ordinance uh 111

um excuse me 1112-2026

I first move to amend as submitted to

the clerk by voice

>> second

>> clerk please call the role by voice

>> bankston

>> yes

>> barosa de padilla

>> so chair I know that you asked for

comments in the second one but because

this is a little different I was

>> didn't comment at all

>> my statement about why

>> about your obstaining

>> yeah okay sorry

>> so For more than three decades, I have

had the honor of working at Cityier, a

national nonprofit organization focused

on improving the lives of children

through education. For nearly a decade,

I led the Columbus site and now as part

of my most recent responsibilities at

City Air, I helped to fund raise

throughout the around the country.

Cityear is funded through private public

partnerships like most nonprofits and

since the founding of our site uh the

Nationwide Foundation has been a funer

given the organization's long-standing

partnership with Nationwide including a

potential expansion of that partnership

to additional cities and out of

abundance of caution for ethical

reasons. I'm abstaining from voting on

this piece of legislation.

>> I apologize.

>> So I abstain.

Deakau,

>> no.

>> Dorren,

>> no.

>> Green.

>> Green. No.

Remy,

>> yes.

>> Ross,

>> yes.

>> White,

>> district.

>> Harden.

>> Yes. Amen is passed.

>> Uh, thank you. And um before I move for

final

>> before I move for passage, are there any

final remarks from my colleagues before

I move for passage? Uh Council Member uh

Green.

>> Um I want to acknowledge all of the work

that has gone into getting us here. I

know that especially you, Council Member

Bangston, Council President Harden, you

have um worked tirelessly under

impossible time constraints uh to fix

the numerous very real and significant

um challenges with this deal that itself

was developed over a period of I have to

imagine at least 6 months or more. Um

and I see that work and I am so deeply

grateful for it. Um, and I respect it so

much. Um, I also have no doubt that, um,

it seems very apparent to me after the

conversations we've had over the last

few weeks during these hearings that we

all see the flaws in the plan that was

presented to us and that we all

universally

um, knew that they needed to be fixed.

We understand what's at stake right now.

We all want Columbus to grow. We all

want to bring opportunities like this um

to our city. We all want to find a path

uh where we are able to succeed as a

community and also we all want to take

care of our residents. Uh but for me

this decision ultimately comes down

to a few things. It comes down to

community trust. It comes down to

process. It comes down to policy

priorities. And I think most

importantly, it comes down to who bears

the risk when all of those things break

down. And so we learned last Monday that

as early as last October, this public

land was offered to be used as this park

uh in one of our most underresourced

neighborhoods, the site of a long

promise adaptive recreation center for

people with different abilities. a

project that families in this community

have spent a decade advocating for um

and one that this legislative body had

already funded and then a year later

that legislative action was seemingly

vetoed uh without any notice to us. So

if that if this site was offered in

October, then that means that there were

months, literally months, nearly a half

of a year, where this conversation could

have happened with transparently where

alternative sites could have been

explored, where the administration could

have worked collaboratively with both

the community and with council to get

this right the first time. And instead

we are being asked to respond in a

matter of weeks to decisions that we had

no part of that were made over a matter

of a half of a year or more without any

disclosure. Collaboration and attention

to process is something we don't just do

because it's fun. It's something that we

do because when those things are

bypassed, it puts us exactly in the

situation that we find ourselves in

right now. being asked to make

highstakes decisions on an accelerated

time that we didn't even know about or

create without a fair opportunity to

even try and be able to deliver a

solution where everybody wins. And I

think we could have done that here. I

appreciate the efforts to find a path

forward, including the revised financial

plan, which I think is smart policy, um,

including the idea of convening a workg

group and the commitment of private

dollars. But we're asked to be uh we're

asked to vote on this today. And so I

have to make a decision based on what

facts are in front of me. And I cannot

support a deal that asks one of our most

vulnerable neighborhoods, a neighborhood

already facing, as Chair Reed said, the

one the lowest life expectancy in the

entire state of Ohio to give up its only

park as well as a critical investment in

accessible recreation in exchange for

uncertainty. And I also have to speak to

the broader context of where we find

ourselves in right now. I know that the

auditor spoke earlier tonight about how,

you know, we have a great credit rating

and the fiscal um stability of the city,

but we talked about this openly in the

budget process. We are facing real

financial challenges as a city.

Challenges that right now demand our

full attention, our discipline, and our

focus. challenge is that when we passed

our budget two months ago, there was

another commitment to convene a work

group that we would aggressively address

those budget challenges that are

barreling toward us within. And to date,

that work group has never convened. And

instead, we've been working overtime

trying to fix this problem, a problem

that didn't have to exist in the first

place. But here we are nonetheless put

in the absolutely terrible position of

trying to backfill broken promises and

trying to fix a bad deal that we weren't

a part of making. And we talk a lot

about um about public private

partnerships. But this is not what I

think partnership looks like.

This isn't the way that we do things.

This isn't the Columbus way. This

situation wasn't inevitable. It's the

result of decisions that were made

without transparency, collaboration, or

the diligence that a plan like this

requires in order to execute. And what

I've heard over and over again from

neighbors is why are we the ones that

have to wait?

>> So, this is where I'm going to land. For

me, this is about keeping our word, um,

protecting our priorities, and making

sure that the communities who have

waited the longest are not the ones that

are being told to wait their turn again.

Um and so um while I have deep grat

gratitude for all the work that has gone

into this and I understand I suppose how

others could arrive at a different

conclusion which I respect and I

appreciate all of you. Um but for those

those reasons I'm obviously voting no

president.

>> Thank you chair. I I will be brief. Um,

I want to thank you and and both the

council president for working overtime

in the last six weeks. You should not

have been this body should not have been

put in this position. The community

should not have been put in this

position to try to make a bad deal

better. And while we are significantly I

think this legislation reflects I think

the values that both of you have brought

to make this better. Um, you know,

ultimately I think with more time we

could have gotten there, but ultimately

we're asked to vote here. this evening

and um

I cannot support this at this time, but

the reason we are here is not because of

the lack of you two trying to make this

deal as best as you possibly can. And I

believe both of you at your word that

you're going to make this right. Um as

much as within your power for those

folks in the community. Um but tonight I

can't be supportive.

Nevertheless,

>> council.

>> Well, thank you, chair. Um, thank you,

President Harden, for the work that you

put into this to improve a proposal that

came to us um in a way that as for

mentioned earlier, it was a terrible

proposal initially and not one that I

could support as it was. It relied on

asking taxpayers to pay back a loan to

billionaires and it fa also failed to to

account for the commitments made to the

community.

That breakdown particularly around that

park designed for adaptive to be

adaptive for residents of all abilities

was a failure in coordination and

transparency.

It created confusion.

It eroded trust. And it put this council

in a position of having to fix a

proposal that should have been stronger

before it ever saw the light of day.

I also want to acknowledge the residents

and community leaders

who spoke up. Your advocacy mattered and

it helped lead to a better outcome. And

that's what we did here tonight.

We restructured this deal so that the

general taxpayers are not carrying the

burden. If you do not use uh Scott's

Miracle Growth

uh field, you are not paying for this.

The users of the facility are

contributing through an increased

admissions fee to cover the debt

service. We also secured long-term value

for the city with revenue continuing

after the bonds are paid off. That's 2

and a.5 billion plus per year that the

city can use for whatever it deems

necessary at that time. And importantly,

we've addressed this park not fully, but

it does provide accountability, a public

process, and certainly new private

dollars that not only will an adaptive

park be built, but we secured that $3

million contribution from the ownership

group to help deliver on the commitments

that were already made to this

neighborhood.

So, it is not about writing a blank

check to billionaires. It's about

striking the right deal with private

ownership. It is about embracing women's

sports and making sure Columbus is part

of the future. I believe that the

National Women's Soccer League team

brings new fans, new events, and it does

bring new opportunity to our city. So,

while this was a terrible deal and not

easy, after the changes were made, I do

believe that this is something that I

can support and therefore I'm going to

vote yes.

Thank you. Any other colleagues?

>> Sure.

>> Um I want to start by saying something

that I haven't heard be said by the

administration at all, which is I am

sorry. Um I'm sorry to this community.

I am sorry

>> because what we have seen throughout

this process reflects in my view a lack

of care and consideration for both the

need and the time you all have invested

in imagining what McCoy Park could be.

Um and it should have been honored from

the very beginning.

Our role as council is to serve as the

last line of defense for this community.

And trust requires transparency, honest

answers, and a willingness to

acknowledge when harm has been done.

Of which until council intervene, none

of that was happening. And so I am

sorry.

I am extremely frustrated by this

process.

So much so that my decisions have not

been made literally until today.

This process started long before I

arrived here on council and long before

this community was asked to accept a

deal that now threatens to overshadow

years of vision planning and advocacy.

And when critical information is only

made available through a public hearing

just two weeks before the scheduled time

for a vote, it undermines confidence. I

understand that

this is not how we build trust. It's not

how we govern responsibly. And the

administration should be ashamed of

itself for the blatant disregard of the

people of this community.

I want to thank the community members

that have offered to me information,

have offered to me time, have offered to

me ear.

It absolutely mattered. It was

absolutely considered and how we got

here today.

At the same time, it's not lost on me.

That the Southware corridor of this city

deserves investment that is tangible,

not empty verbal commitments that I have

no choice to believe would not have been

honored but for council's intervention.

And that should concern all of us.

And despite the total ineptitude

displayed during this process,

I have wrestled with this decision.

The opportunity to bring a National

Women's Soccer League team to our city

carries real promise, small business

growth, more than 200 jobs, and a

projected economic impact in the

hundreds of millions of dollars.

Those are not insignificant outcomes.

Columbus can and should be a contender

for trans transformational

opportunities,

but we can't pursue growth at the

expense of community.

We have a responsibility to do both.

And so I want to express my sincere

gratitude to Chair Bankston, to Council

President Harden

for leaning in and ensuring that

residents remained at the center of

these negotiations,

even if it came later than it should

have.

The amendments before us, I believe,

create accountability.

I think they set clear expectations

and I think they ensure the right voices

are at the table. And importantly, they

require meaningful progress on the full

vision of McCoy Park before any public

dollars move forward.

It is important to note that this

legislation carries zero dollars with

it.

There is no fiscal impact at this

moment.

And what would have been a wholesale

ignoring of one of the most underserved

communities in our city can now serve as

an opportunity to rebuild trust. And I

am making a personal commitment to be at

the table with the community to ensure

that the needs of our neighbors are met

should this legislation pass.

The administration will not be able to

steamroll or blindside this council or

this community as we move forward.

There are many additional times that

legislation has to become come back

before this council before this is

final.

And I want to make sure everybody here

understands that if these commitments

are not made, you will not get a vote

for me to allow for the bonds to be sold

to make this deal possible.

>> Thank you, Council Council Member White.

>> Thank you, Chair. And I I'll be brief

because if it had not been for your work

and the work of Council President, I

would not be supporting this. In fact, I

left the hearing thinking we were in a

good position. And then I hear, hey,

there are plans for a park, which thank

you, Director Stevens, for kind of

owning up to that miscommunication

because I was under the impression the

funds were not there. And the only way

in which we were going to have adaptive

sports on that site was to move forward

with this deal. None of us should be

surprised that the community was not

engaged, that council was left in the

dark. that seems to be par for the

course from this administration. If we

did not have requirements in the form of

this amendment that made these neighbors

whole, I would not be supporting this.

This is a

bad circumstance that we have been

thrust upon and now you have the

competing interest of how do you support

economic growth for the city? How do you

support the residents at the same time?

And I honestly feared that the moment

this goes down, what was promised for

this community probably still would not

have happened. This is the only way we

move forward to ensure that residents

will be made whole.

>> Final remarks, Council President.

>> Um I think that the kids are not in the

room any longer. I I let me say that I

have never been so pissed

um

by the position that uh and I'll take

ownership that that that as council

president you guys have my counsel in.

Not you guys, the mayor

has my counsel in. I've never been so

pissed.

And I mean it. I am so pissed.

This this this did not have to be this

way.

I have a message to the mayor. I have a

message to the the business community

who

talks about the Columbus way.

This process bastardized the Columbus

way. You left out the community,

put us our backs up against the wall

>> and say that this is the only way that

we can move forward and have progress.

It's absurd.

It's it's it's it's

I have never been so frustrated and this

is what pisses me off about it is

because we will have to do big things

again business community

and every time you

give people who have actual concerns

this type of example of what you call

the Columbus way. This is not my

Columbus way.

This is not this is not what I am a part

of. This is not this is not how I

operate. This is not how I expect that

the community because this is my

concern. I don't even think that it is

just that

folks are inept. I think that there was

some disrespect

that was given to not bringing everybody

along

that it just and that's the thing I we

still have to be able to do big things

and and this process is a glaring

example

and makes it harder the next time.

And if I did not believe two things, one

that there was another opportunity to

continue to to get this team here, and

two, that even if we voted this thing

down, that a park would be built. I

don't believe that there was not the

resources actually there. There was not

the plan moving forward to stick with

the timeline that Chair Reed talked

about. So, I'm taking a terrible vote to

make sure that we are still able to do a

very big thing like bring women's soccer

to Columbus. And let me just say this on

that piece.

>> I'm talking I'm sorry, ma'am.

I would encourage the community not to

ever again pit one community like women

against a another community like the

southwest side who's also

underserved and say that that is a

choice that we are choosing one or the

other. Don't do that again. That was not

helpful.

>> It was not helpful. It was offensive. We

support young women. We support women.

I'm a yes because

I we have to build this park. There was

a comment. There was a promise made and

a promise broken.

I promise you, Chair Reed,

we will get this park built. We will

stick to the timelines. I will hold them

accountable. And I like what chair what

council member Ross said. This isn't the

only vote. The bonds have to be let on

this thing.

I'm voting yes.

Uh, thank you, Council President. And

with that, I will call for the vote. Um,

I move for passage on ordinance one uh

111, sorry, 1112-2026.

And I move for passage as amended by

voice.

>> Cler, please call the row.

>> Bankston,

>> yes.

>> Barosa de Podia,

>> Deakau,

>> no.

>> Dorren,

>> no.

Green, no.

>> Remy,

>> yes.

>> Ross,

>> yes.

>> W

>> yes.

>> President Harden,

>> yes. The ordinance is passed.

>> Shame.

Shame.

Shame.

>> That's all I have for my committee.

Council President,

>> you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.

You're all fraud. You gave away

billionaires.

>> Joe Mattel, get out of here, please.

>> Thank you.

The ownership group is supporting a

Trump acolyte. How can you stand for

that? Hasslam has millions. He doesn't

need more pockets.

>> Are you going to get this containment in

72 hours?

>> No, we're going to keep on going.

>> Just take all our money. We don't need

it.

He doesn't have enough.

>> The next committee to come before

council is the public service and

transportation committee. Committee is

chaired by council member Rosa Deodia.

Councilman, the floor is yours.

>> Thank you, Council President. Tonight we

have one item on second read for public

service and transportation 0820 20226

to appropriate community authority

assessment funds within the Hayden Run

South TIFF fund to transfer community

authority assessment funds from the

Hayden Run South TIFF fund to the Hayden

Run South TIFF capital fund to

appropriate community authority

assessment funds within the Hayden Run

South TIFF Capital Fund to authorize the

city attorney's office real estate

division to contract for professional

services related to the acquisition of

fee simple title and lesser interest in

into property needed for the arterial

street rehabilitation Avery Road project

to authorize the city attorney's office

real estate division to negotiate with

property owners to acquire the

additional rights of way necessary to

complete this project and to authorize

the expenditure of up to $1 million from

the Hayden Run South TIFF capital fund

to authorize a director of public

service or a designate to execute a

construction Yeah, construction contract

or a simple instrument and any

amendments or modifications thereto as

may be necessary with CSX Transportation

Incorporated to facilitate the

construction of the arterial street

rehabilitation Avery Road project. The

city is planning improvements to Avery

Road from Hayden Run Road to Tuttle

Crossing Boulevard. The project includes

reconstruction of over one mile of Avery

Road in addition to other elements like

a new roundabout and shared use path.

This ordinance authorizes the city

attorney to acquire real estate to

facilitate timely completion of the

project. Do my colleagues have any

questions or comments? Seeing none, I

move for passage.

>> Cler, please call the role.

>> Banks Barosa Deodia de AOA Dors Green

Remy Ross Weiss President Harden

>> pass.

>> That's all for me this evening.

>> Thank you chair. Uh, next committee to

come before council is the public safety

and criminal justice committee chair by

council me. Council member, the floor is

yours.

Thank you very much, Council President.

Um, tonight in public safety and

criminal justice, I have three

ordinances for second read. Um, tonight,

or actually, I only have two. I lied. I

have two. Um, we have two different

settlements to consider that originate

out of the Department of Public Safety.

We will hear from that department and

the city attorney's office before I move

for a vote. In a year in which we face

an incredibly tight budget, it is not

lost on me the effects that these

settlements will have on ongoing

operations both in the near future and

as the year goes along. As we learn

more, I want to let my colleagues, city

officials, and members of the audience

and all residents of Columbus know that

we are taking a hard look into the

causes of such settlements and

mitigation opportunities we can take how

to avoid such matters in the future. The

first ordinance is 9872026 to authorize

and direct the city attorney to settle

the lawsuit known as Brook Wilson versus

City of Columbus, case number 222

CV4427 pending in the United States

District Court for the Southern District

of Ohio to authorize the expenditure of

the sum of $750,000 and0 in settlement

of the lawsuit to authorize a transfer

of $750,000 within the general fund and

to declare an emergency. So, I'm going

to go ahead and turn this over to

Melanie Tobias, who is the criminal

division chief for the city attorney's

office to tell us more about this

settlement.

>> Thank you.

>> Thank you. Thank you, Chair Remy, uh,

President Harden, council members. We

actually have today to present on this

um, our deputy chief of labor and

employment section in the city

attorney's office, Paul Burnernhard. Um,

he's been, uh, intimately involved with

this litigation for the four years that

it's been going on. Um, so I'd ask him

to come up to the podium um to

share a presentation and he's uh the

best resource to answer any questions

council has on this settlement.

Good evening, Chair Rei, President

Harden, members of council. I have

served as the lead attorney of record

for the city of Columbus on the Brook

Wilson lawsuit since it was filed back

in 2022.

I want to give you a brief overview of

the case and then explain why we believe

it's in the best in the city's best

interest to settle the lawsuit.

Uh by way of background, the plainif in

the case, Brooke Wilson, was a police

sergeant assigned to the to supervise

the accident investigation unit at CPD,

otherwise known as AIU.

And in late May of 2020,

a cadet from the division's cadet

program was assigned to AIOU.

Less than two weeks after that cadet was

assigned to the AIU, the George Floyd

protest broke out in the city of

Columbus.

Sergeant Wilson was part of the city's

all hands-on deck response to that

protest, and he in fact worked the

streets uh during the protests. When

Sergeant Wilson returned to the office,

the cadet asked him, "What is it like or

what was it like working out on the

streets during this time?"

And Sergeant Wilson looked at the cadet

and said, "How would you like it if

somebody called you the N-word?" Except

Sergeant Wilson

didn't say the N word. He actually said

the racial slur.

The cadet was offended by this.

Obviously,

there were no witnesses to the

conversations between Sergeant Wilson

and the cadet. It was her word against

his.

The cadet reported the incident in an

invest and Sergeant Wilson was placed

under investigation.

During the investigation, Sergeant

Wilson requested to take a polygraph

exam which indicated that he was being

when after he took it, the results

showed that he was being deceptive when

he denied using the racial slur to the

cadet.

The investigation resulted in a

sustained finding that Sergeant Wilson

had violated the city's and divisions

EEO policy.

The public safety director, who at the

time was Ned Pettis, suspended

Wilson and did something for the first

time that had been that had been done at

CPD.

Safety Director Pettis demoted Wilson

from police sergeant to police officer.

And that demotion had the effect of

removing Wilson from the accident

investigation unit.

Before he took a new assignment on

patrol, Wilson resigned from the

division and later claimed constructive

discharge.

Although the discipline was ultimately

sustained through arbitration,

Wilson filed this lawsuit alleging race,

age, and sex discrimination

as well as retaliation for him

complaining about being discriminated

against during the investigation.

Fast forward four years, we we were

engaged in litigation for four years

defending this lawsuit, and we were

prepared to try the the case in federal

court.

A week prior to trial, the judge brought

the parties in for a final pre-trial

conference to discuss

the upcoming trial.

And the judge indicated during that

pre-trial conference

that he was going to rule against the

city on a number of evidentiary issues.

Most notably, the judge indicated that

he was not going to allow in the

polygraph exam as evidence at trial.

The judge also indicated that he was not

going to allow the city to present

evidence that Wilson was nearing

retirement and had in fact been

collecting its pension since resigning

back in 2021.

That would have allowed Wilson to claim

lost wages of approximately $2.5 million

at trial.

The city would also have to be would

also have been responsible for Wilson's

attorney's fees. This is the type of

case that the losing party has to pay

the other side's attorney's fees. had

and the city lost at trial, we would

have been responsible for paying not

only the $2.5 million uh to satisfy the

judgment, but also

in excess of $500,000 to his attorneys

for trying the case.

The city also would have u been put in a

bind on the evidentiary on the what we

believe was going to be the evidentiary

ruling on the polygraph exam because

that's why the city did what it did.

Without the polygraph exam, this was a

he said, she said with no witnesses. The

polygraph exam is what tipped the

scales, giving, you know, the city

preponderance of the evidence to take

the actions that it did. It's why we did

what we did. Uh there was also a

comparable in the case. Brooke Wilson

was going to argue that he was treated

less favorably than a female black

lieutenant at the division who also had

EEO charges brought against her.

The difference between those two cases,

according to then safety director

Pettis, was the polygraph exam. So he

wasn't, you know, had that evidentiary

ruling gone as we expected it would

based on the judge's uh presentation to

us,

safety director Pettis would not have

been able to testify why he treated

those two cases differently. It was an

uphill battle to say the least. So

rather than take the chance at trial and

given the financial exposure that the

city faced after conferring with the

safety dire the current safety director

and the administration we made the

decision to negotiate a settlement with

Wilson's attorneys. That's why we are

here asking for $750,000 to affectuate

the settlement of the case. And let me

be clear, it pains me to settle this

case. I wanted to go to trial just like

any trial attorney would would want to

try a case. But given the real

likelihood of losing at trial and then

having to come to this council and ask

for two and a half million to pay the

judgment and another $500,000 plus to

pay the attorney's fees, we were looking

at exposure upwards of $3 million um you

know had this case gone to trial. So

given the that risk, we believe that

it's in the city's best interest to

settle the case at this time.

I'm happy to answer any questions

council has.

>> Yeah, thank you, Paul. Um, I'm going to

go ahead and throw it over to Council

Member Bro, Deputy.

>> Thank you, chair. I have a couple

questions. Um, first question is that I

also, from my understanding, this was

not an isolated incident with this

particular officer and um the tell me

her title again.

>> The cadet.

>> The cadet. this there was there were

other situations that she had

essentially put forward of her

challenges with this particular

gentleman.

>> Yes, council member. Let me speak

briefly to that. The cadet had she was

transferred into AIU in late May of

2020. She had only worked with Sergeant

Wilson for less than two weeks before he

allegedly made this the racial slur to

her. Prior to that, beginning on day one

that this cadet met Sergeant Wilson, uh,

according to her, he made a number of

comments um in her presence that

offended her.

>> Um, you know, she later testified that

it it wasn't the comments themselves or

the nature. It was how he said that and

how he presented them what she referred

to as microaggressions. Uh, there wasn't

one, there was maybe a half dozen that

she that she kept notes of. And when she

did report the racial slur, she also

reported these other microaggressions

that she experienced from Sergeant

Wilson

>> and the two cases that the they

essentially pointed to that in the other

case where the other officer um was not

demoted. What year was that?

>> That was in 2018.

>> 2018. So this was after the this

particular case came up after the

department had started changing their

policies.

>> That's correct. After that previous

case, the city hired created a new

position within public safety to take

EEO investigations out of internal

affairs and brought into uh to public

safety to investigate. This was early

on. It was the first assistant director

of EEO compliance with public safety who

was assigned to investigate

>> who cited on not who cited that there

was wrongdoing but based on the

gentleman.

>> Correct.

>> And the polygraph he asked to take the

poly he volunteered to take the

polygraph. Correct.

>> That's correct. the the contract the the

FOP contract at the time allowed the

focus the subject of the focus of an

investigation to request to take a

polygraph in order to exonerate and

clear themselves. uh that's no longer in

the FOP contract, but it was at the time

and then Sergeant Wilson um did in fact

request to take it

>> because we've used polygraphs

before and one would one might presume

that if the polygraph was in his favor

that he would then use that as a see I

was right. Correct.

>> We're certain of that. And then when you

my last question, when you went to the

judge, can you share with us more about

why the judge would not put the

polygraph in?

>> Uh yes, the the judge flat out said, you

know, polygraphs aren't admissible in

courts, which is true. Generally,

polygraphs are not admissible in

criminal trials uh to use as evidence

against the defendant. He took the

position that why would I allow a

polygraph in this instance? I don't know

that he fully understood the difference

between the contractual requirement or

the contractual allowance of using the

polygraph which in fact the arbitrator

said we could use under the contract

versus the judge's apparent disdain or

disbelief in the use of polygraphs

generally.

>> Would you say that there was another

reason that the judge would have

encouraged us to settle as opposed to

taking us to court?

>> Yes, council member. the judge made a

number of representations at the final

pre-trial conference that uh he did not

think that the city had taken the

correct position in this case.

>> So, I'm just going to I'm not going to

bury the lead here. I'm a no on this

particular case. And I will say that I

understand that we have a stewardship

role here that every dollar that we put

towards a settlement is a dollar that we

take away from housing or we take away

from parks or we take away from anything

else. But what really gets my goat about

this particular case, right, is um

without seeing all of the facts, I am

not an attorney. I was not the judge in

question. But first of all, this is why

it makes it difficult for women to come

forward because microaggressions are so

difficult to to show to prove. I think

it's also difficult to say there. When

you set a precedence, that means someone

is going to be first. you were going to

say you're demoted because you're going

to be the first person demoted because

if the department is doing things

differently then this would be why. But

what really upsets me is that this

particular judge essentially

because he felt like this was a

diversity case or he felt like this did

not fall in line with a particular set

of values or mindset that he has then

essentially he is bullying us into doing

what is not just and that is a challenge

for me because I understand that we have

to move forward with you know making the

best investments here and obviously ly

750,000 is much less than 2 million. But

what this set sends a signal for me and

I don't want to be in the seat to make

this decision is that we are rewarding

somehow bad behavior and we're doing

that with taxpayer dollars. And that's

what this entire case says to me both

with the gentleman in question and also

with this particular judge. And so I

think

at a time when justice is not political,

justice is justice, it is irresponsible

for someone to sit in a seat of power

and not look not look with an eye of

justice, but look through a lens that is

somewhat political or valued or

whatever. And so, you know, I don't know

how the rest of my colleagues feel. I

certainly know that for me I cannot move

this forward. I I I I

first of all all of these settlements

are so challenging for me all the time.

Sometimes I don't feel like they're

enough for the ch for the harm that we

cause. Sometimes I feel like we're

giving someone money just because it is

it is better and it is a fiscal

decision. But this was the one that I

just I I do not like the statement that

it is sending. I'm also not going to be

bullied. Be a federal judge. be a

whatever judge. I'm not going to do

that. So, I'm just letting you know,

chair, and I know we had a convers.

>> That's fair. Council member, uh, council

president,

>> excuse me, sir. I just want to see the

finance chair. Finance, how chair, how

much do we have budgeted for,

uh, settlements this year?

>> Yeah, President Harden, thanks for the

question. We have $6 million budgeted in

2026 for legal settlements.

>> Okay. So, we have $6 million. If this

council takes the city attorney's

recommendation, this take $750,000

out of it. If we don't and we push this

to court,

we could potentially with this just one

case

empty out half of what you budgeted.

>> That's correct, Council President.

>> Okay.

Okay. Okay.

>> Are there any other question? Uh,

Council Member Ross,

>> this is a follow-up question. I

apologize. I may have missed the

specifics on this. The judge is throwing

out the polygraph.

>> Yes, we So, we never actually got a

ruling from the judge. It would have

been coming in the day day or two before

trial. Okay.

>> But he indicated to us he said the words

to the effect of, "I don't want to let

the polygraph in at trial."

>> So,

>> he doesn't want to look at it or there's

a

>> let it in as evidence at trial.

>> Got it. And what was the the pre legal

precedence for

>> not allowing the

>> it was just his general understanding of

criminal law and how polygraph

polygraphs are not permitted in

>> okay

>> in criminal trials

but for some limited circumstances.

>> Okay. And we believe that that was kind

of the lynch pin for being successful in

this case.

>> We did

>> was that piece of evidence?

>> Yes. We believe had had the judge ruled

that we could introduce the polygraph

and the results, we were fully prepared

to try this case.

Any other questions for

Thank you, Paul. Appreciate your your

commitment. Uh I'm now going to ask

Deputy Director George Speaks to talk

about the steps that the Department of

Public Safety have taken to ensure this

type of settlement doesn't happen in the

future.

I think it's better if I give

perspective.

Um, so I've been litigating cases since

the 1980s. I'm the old guy here. Uh, I

can't tell you how many cases that I've

been involved in either as the attorney

or as a client. Um, and I always hearken

back to my favorite professor in law

school. He always told us that

settlements are not about right or

wrong. rather they're designed to reduce

monetary exposure. They're designed to

reduce risk. In other words, settlement

should not be looked at as a as a moral

judgment. Settlement should be looked at

as a financial uh uh judgment. Um so it

quite frankly detests me to recommend

settlement in this case.

Uh nevertheless, it's in the best

economic interest to do so because if we

don't, we are taking a tremendous risk.

That is my perspective.

>> Council member Green.

>> Director, how many There's a lot of I

think I mean I've only been here two

years, but a lot of the settlements that

we've settled, I think many of them were

under public safety. How many um

how many uh cases do we have in court

compared to the amount that we settle in

this way? Do you know or just can you

get give me like some you know a

ballpark figure?

>> So let me talk subjectively and

objectively. Yes. at any one time and

this includes both

HR type cases as the two cases before

you are tonight

>> and inherit and police is use of force

>> um wrongful arrest type cases. So any

one time I would guess around 25 cases

going on at the time. Mhm.

>> So subjectively around 25 or so.

>> Um objectively and the dispatch has done

this in the past. They have looked and

compared similarsized cities to each

other and that actually is very good. Uh

especially in terms of the amount of

judgments we pay out.

>> Um we are a huge organization as I often

tell people. Um you can now add the

public safety forces up in Cleveland and

Cincinnati and they don't equal the size

of Columbus. You could add up to square

miles of Cleveland and Cincinnati. They

don't equal the size of Columbus. We are

a very large entity.

>> Yeah, that was going to be my next

question. Comparison to peer cities. Um

I also think um

well I'll pause there.

>> I do want to go back to you though and

further ask that question. What changes

has the department made to ensure this

type of thing doesn't happen? I don't

understand that question. Um,

>> well, you talk about you still have an

EEO officer within the department.

>> Well, in terms of Oh, in terms of I

thought you meant in a specific case

what we would do to to not come to this

result and and here um we take

um a workplace free discriminatory place

very seriously. We have uh two people

whose sole job it is to uh investigate

these types of cases. In this particular

case, 12 people were interviewed. There

was a lie detector test. And by the way,

one thing that city attorney Barnhart uh

didn't say is that that lie detector

test was asked to be verified. That test

was sent to the Ohio Highway Patrol who

verified that the person um

um was being deceptive in his answer. Um

we have a chain of command investigation

occurred and by a propoundonderance of

the evidence they believed that

uh the discrimination occurred. A

hearing was held before the director by

a propundance of the evidence. He issued

discipline. That case went to an

independent arbitrator. The arbitrator

said, and I actually brought it, quote,

based on the evidence here, the

arbitrator cannot find that the city

aired.

So I think that we acted as we should

have acted. Our problem here is one of

evidence on the eve of trial.

And again, I would go back to uh

settlements are a matter matter of risk

evaluation. Council

member Rosedia,

>> the last thing I'm going to say, I don't

want to belver it. I know it's a long

evening, but I think for me in this

particular in in this particular case,

and I know I'm causing the city attorney

much heartburn in saying this, okay,

because we're going to have to go

between be before this judge again and

they're going to be pissed and they're

going to whatever. That to me is an

abuse of power. For them to say that

this is a diversity case is a problem.

That is a problem. Justice does not see

color. We already know this system is

not set up for people. But when you are

going to go before before you even

present the case, they're already

telling you the key piece of evidence,

which by the way was this gentleman

saying, "Yes, I am so sure I I'm not

lying." When a lie detector that's been

verified has said you are, I bet if we

turn the tables and he came in with

that, it would be a different story. And

I think that's what gets me. And I

agree. I This is why I'm not a lawyer.

Okay? Because because

the the question before me before me

sitting in this seat is I do feel like

it is rewarding bad behavior. I do feel

like this sends a signal to people and

and again,

you know, this could pass and we could

settle this and that's fine. But to not

take this moment to say that this is not

okay, that this is wild. For a judge to

make a decision to essentially bully us

into telling us to take the key piece of

evidence that was volunteered by the

person who brought this case forward is

bananas to me. And maybe it was because

I couldn't talk for the rest of for the

first part of the evening. All this is

coming out now. I just from the first

time that I heard this case, I it just

was difficult for me to say yes to to to

to rewarding this when it is clear that

the person is is wrong.

>> Thank you, Council Member um Council

Member Ross.

Um, was there consideration about an

evidentiary hearing to determine whether

or not like so that the judge could like

make a public decision about this piece

of evidence?

>> Thank you, council member. Uh, it was

before the court on a motion and

lemonade. The

>> a motion. Okay.

>> A motion lemonade. The the pliff had

filed a motion in lemonade asking the

court to explain.

>> Can you just explain for the council

what a motion and lemonade is?

>> Yes. A motion in lemonade is a pre-trial

filing where you're asking the court to

rule on evidentiary issues prior to

trial so that when you go to trial, you

know what you're going to be allowed to

introduce into evidence or and what

you're not. The Wilson's attorneys had

filed a motion with the court asking

that the polygraph exam not be allowed

into evidence at trial. So that's what

that was the procedural posture when we

were at the final pre-trial conference

where the judge uh you know let it be

known that he was not inclined to let

that piece of evidence into trial.

>> Thank you.

>> Thank you. Um and I do want to thank

deputy director for going into that a

little bit more. It wasn't um I have

faith in you. we just you you wanted to

illuminate that a little bit more and

what goes on after these things and so

appreciate that um explanation.

Obviously, these things are incredibly

difficult for us and generally there is

situations like this where you know what

the right thing was to do in this thing

but because the risk of losing puts more

taxpay multiplier more amounts of

taxpayer dollars on the line. It really

pains us to pass these things. But

unfortunately the risk is too great. And

so um you know before I was ready to put

this on the agenda I wanted to make sure

we had learned about all the situations

within this we place you know where what

were the safeguards that were put in

place to help ensure things like this

don't happen again. And you know, after

talking with the city attorney's office,

with the department of public safety,

and again, listening to what you said

tonight, you know, I believe the best

path path forward is to vote to settle

this ma matter. Um, I the cost is great

and as we heard tonight, settling these

things is not about right or wrong. It's

about being financially financially

responsible as we evaluate risk. And and

you know, I hear you. I hear my

colleagues. We we talk about this a lot

before these things come up, but it's

more important now than ever that this

council takes the oversight of these

things seriously and start asking

questions. And we've been asking

questions of the department every single

time. Um, I'll turn it back. I don't

know if you had anything further to say,

um, Melanie.

Okay. Okay. With that, I move for

passage by voice.

Cler, please call the role by voice.

>> Bankston.

>> Barrosa Deodia.

>> Deakau.

>> Yes.

>> Dorens.

>> Yes.

>> Green.

>> Yes.

>> Remy.

>> Yes.

>> Ross.

>> Yes.

>> White.

>> Yes.

>> President Harden.

>> Yes.

>> Passed.

>> Thank you, Council President. Next, I

have 1043 2026 to authorize and direct

the city attorney to settle the Ohio

Civil Rights Commission claim known as

Hana O Hassan versus City of Columbus,

charge number C71

013525

0321205

to authorize the expenditure of the sum

of $36,000

in settlement of the claim and to

declare an emergency. I'd like to once

again ask uh Melanie Tobias from the

city attorney's office to tell us more

about this settlement.

>> Thank you, Chair Remy, President Harden,

council members. Um so this litigation

is in a different posture than we

normally see uh coming before council.

This settlement um was arrived at

pre-lawsuit.

Um and so I'll give you some background

on how we arrived there. Um, and because

it's pre-lawsuit, the we're going to

refer to the what we normally say as

plaintiff as the complainant because

there was is not a plaintiff in this

case. that the complainant filed an

allegation with the Ohio Civil Rights

Commission, essentially alleging that in

2024, the Columbus Division of Police

refused to make her an offer of

employment in retaliation for her

complaining about the civilian

polygrapher hired by the Division of

Police to conduct her pre-employment

polygraph test.

The planet had previously unsuccessfully

applied to become um a police officer

with the Columbus Division of Police in

2022 and in 2023.

In 2024, she went through the same

application process as the previous two

years. But after her polygraph test, she

made a formal complaint to CPD and

public safety about the polygrapher,

alleging that he had made inappropriate

comments to her during the polygraph

exam.

uh public safety conducted an immediate

investigation into her claims and

determined that the polygrapher in fact

had performed below the standards

expected of a civilian polygrapher with

the division of police and public

safety. So they uh disciplined uh the

poligrapher entering into a last chance

agreement which is an agreement uh where

the civilian employee um promises not to

uphold all the standards and if they

make any further mistakes no matter how

minor they can be terminated and they

don't have the right to go through

arbitration or to contest that

termination. And in addition to doing

that um CPD offered the complainant a

new polygraph test. uh she submitted to

that and agreed to do that. Um as in

2022 and 2023, the division of police

ultimately did not end up offering her a

spot at the police academy.

She then filed a complaint with the Ohio

Civil Rights Commission after that um

lack of an offer to her. Uh after an

investigation, the Civil Rights

Commission found no probable cause and

issued the complainant a right to sue

letter. She had to go through this

process first with the Civil Rights

Commission before she was going to be

allowed to proceed forward with a

lawsuit. She was represented by council

and it appeared to the city attorney's

office that it was clear that they were

going to um go forward with litigation

and file a lawsuit. So, it's that point

um that we entered into negotiations

with a complainant. I think it's

important to highlight for council that

a finding of no probable cause by the

Civil Rights Commission doesn't hold any

um standing in subsequent litigation.

It's not a bar to her filing a lawsuit.

It's not a defense that we can put

forward to defend the city that the

Civil Rights Commission made this

finding. It's just a process that an

individual is required to go through

first before filing litigation.

Um, so during uh

uh during these negotiations with the

complainant, uh we arrived at this

amount of $36,000 that we're

recommending council approve to settle

this matter. Um deciding to settle a

matter presuit when a lawsuit appears

imminent avoids the costs that are

incurred and even successful litigation.

So a successful summary judgement motion

on our part for example would still

incur direct costs for depositions and

experts. Once a lawsuit is filed, the

types of claims involved in this matter,

this retaliation claim and harassment

claims um we get to the fees shifting

position which we saw in the previous

case council just cons uh considered.

That's when attorney's fees start to

run. Um, so these are all things that

are that we bring into consideration

when we're determining whether or not um

a settlement is possible. A possibility

for a low settlement is much easier at

the very beginning of litigation when

those attorneys fees aren't starting to

build and build and build. Um, while the

city was confident in its case in this

matter, um, it's not completely without

risk were we to go forward um, and

defend an actual lawsuit being filed by

the complainant. And so in order to

again as we are learning more all the

time as these settlements come in front

of the the council judges have a lot of

discretion once a case is filed and it

goes into court we lose a lot of

control. Um and so the city attorney's

office believes that the settling this

matter for $36,000

um takes into consideration exposure

that we would have if the lawsuit had

been filed and we went forward with

that.

>> Thank you very much. Council member

Ross,

>> I'm just presuming it's because we had

already made a determination that that

officer had at least had at least broken

some of our internal rules.

>> Are you are you asking why an offer of

employment wasn't made to the to the

officer? Yeah.

>> Even though there was a a no probable

cause determination by the the admin

side of things, we had already kind of

gone through investigation on our end to

determine that.

>> Correct. Correct. We looked into her

immediate complaints. The public safety

and CPD looked into her immediate

complaint about the polygraphers's

behavior and immediately addressed that.

And I believe assistant director speaks

um can comment on, you know, how that's

handled within CPD and public safety. Um

but with respect to the allegation that

she was retaliated against because she

complained about the polygrapher, no the

investigation, we did not believe that

the city there was no admission that

there was any wrongdoing uh on on the

part of the city in this matter.

>> Okay. Director, is it right to assume

that you were balancing both of those?

>> Yes. So, council mayor, let me point out

the stark contrast with the last case.

So the last case, $750,000 of which over

500,000 of that was attorney fees.

>> That was that case was settled on the

eve of trial. Here you have a case

hasn't been filed yet in court, although

the Ohio Civil Rights Commission found

in favor of the city. So once again,

this is risk management. We're trying to

cut off those attorney fees quickly um

and trying to nip this case in the butt,

if you will, for as low amount as

possible to protect the city.

>> A very stark contrast of two cases.

>> Thank you.

>> Thank you, Deputy Director. Any other

comments? Oh, I'm sorry, Council

President. Yeah, I'm hearkening back to

what I had brought up the last time

because uh

we're we're pretty early into this

budget

and

um uh we are spending down our

settlements pretty quickly. Let me ask

the question a little differently.

How do we back our way in as we decide

what to settle now or not with the risk

back and forth of knowing that we

have set aside only $6 million? Like is

the is the department and city attorney

taking that into consideration? Should

that be a consideration that council

takes into consideration? Should we ask

for? Well, I guess when we do have the

committee to come together, we'll talk

about how we plan to

>> because so who should be making this who

should be thinking about this as

grown-ups.

>> President Harden, in terms of timing,

when one files a lawsuit, you get a case

schedule.

Everything is laid out in the case

schedule. So, for example, settlement

conferences, trials, uh we can't dictate

that. Um it's determined by the court.

And so, uh,

there's no way we can say we're only

going, we're not going to settle this

judge. We're not going to offer any

money or a judge, we lose at trial, we

owe something. There's no way of saying

sorry, we're not paying that. Um, it's

not within our power as a party in a

case.

>> Okay. I mean, I'm just trying to bring

focus to where where it looks like we're

barreling towards a pretty big issue. Uh

where we might have more settlements

coming than we have dollars set aside

for. I'm just trying to make sure that

we are in the open talking about how we

are going to rectify this as we all have

to start making very grownup uh fiscal

uh decisions that impact

other departments. Tripoli. I think that

that's probably the real conversation

that is going to happen. But thank you.

Thank you, chair. Thanks. Any other

questions or comments?

Obviously, similar to the previous

legislation, you know, again, these

things are tough votes for us, but I

believe based on the information

presented that it's in the best

financial interest of the city to move

forward. So, if there are no further

questions for my comments, I move for

passage.

>> Second.

Bankston Barroso de Padilla de Akawa

Dorren Green Remy Ross Wish President

Harden

>> passed.

>> Thank you very much council president.

That is all I have this evening.

>> Thank you Mr. Chair.

The final committee to come before

council is the public utilities and

sustainability committee. That committee

is chaired by speedreader council member

Wish. The floor is yours sir.

>> Thank you council president. I think I'm

insulted that the audience cleared out

and we just got to public utilities. Um,

tonight first in public utilities and

sustainability, I have ordinance

0596-2026

to authorize the director of the

department of public utilities to enter

into an indef indefinite quantity

agreement with PTOIC electrical service

LLC for electrical transformer and

switch gear inspection, maintenance, and

repair services to authorize the

expenditure of 170,000 split between the

water and sanitary sewer operating funds

and to wave competitive bidding

provisions of Columbus City Code. This

contract will provide planned

inspections, testing, maintenance, and

repair services to equipment at Columbus

Water and Power Plants, ensuring that

all components are operating correctly

and at the and that the department can

continue to provide uninterrupted

service to the Columbus community. Let

me stop there. See if any questions or

comments from my colleagues. Seeing

none, I move for passage.

>> Please call the role.

>> Banks Rosa Deia de Aard Green Remy Ross

Vice President Harden.

>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance

0868-2026

to authorize the director of the

Department of Public Utilities to enter

into a service contract with KNS

services for the watershed camera

improvements project to wave the formal

bidding requirements of Columbus City

Code to authorize an amendment to the

2025 capital improvement budget to

authorize a transfer funds in

appropriation within the water bond fund

and to authorize the expenditure of up

to $249,34943

for the project. This ordinance provides

for the replacement of the entire

existing camera system at Hoover Dam,

which is a crucial tool for maintaining

awareness of the dam and its surrounding

environment. Let me stop there, see if

any questions or comments from my

colleagues. Seeing none, I move for

passage.

>> Thanks, Denver. Rosa, de a Dorren Green,

Remy Ross, Vice President Harden.

>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance

0873-2026

to authorize the director of the

Department of Public Utilities to enter

into a construction contract with

General Maintenance and Engineering

Company for the Parsons Avenue water

plant roof renovations part 2 project to

authorize an amendment to the 2025

capital improvement budget to

appropriate funds within the water

freshwater market rate fund to make this

ordinance contingent upon the Ohio Water

Development Authority approving a loan

for this project to authorize the

expenditure of up to $2,344,250

from the water freshwater market rate

fund to pay for the project and to

authorize the expenditure of up to

$2,000 from the water bond fund to pay

for prevailing wage services. This

project involves necessary and extensive

roof repairs to a number of buildings at

the Parsons Avenue water plant that will

pre preserve the structural integrity of

the buildings, prevent damage to

interior spaces, and ensure the

operations of the water plant continues

un uninterrupted. Let me stop there. See

if any questions or comments from my

colleagues. Seeing none, I move for

passage.

>> Please call the role. Banks timber roso

de padia de aar dors green remy ros vice

president Harden

>> thank you next I have ordinance

0874-2026

to authorize the director of the

department of public utilities to enter

into a construction contract with clear

creek codings ltd for the 710 east tank

painting Improvements project to

authorize an amendment to the 2025

capital improvement budget to authorize

a transfer of cash and appropriation

between projects within the water bond

fund and to authorize an expenditure of

up to 1 mill6 $614,938.50

for the project from the water bond

fund. This project includes the recoding

of one of the division of water's 2

milliongal water storage tanks as well

as the addition of various safety

improvements to prolong its useful

service life. Let me stop there see if

any questions or comments from my

colleagues. Seeing none, I move for

passage

a dor screen Ross vice president Harden.

>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance

0887-2026

to authorize the director of the

Department of Public Utilities to enter

into a construction contract with JLD

Construction Services LLC for the

Carrier

Court Storm Water Improvements Project

to authorize an amendment to the 2025

capital improvement budget to

appropriate funds within the Water

Development Authority Storm Sewers Fund

to authorize a transfer transfer of cash

appropriation between projects within

the Storm Sewer Bond Fund. to make this

ordinance contingent upon the Ohio Water

Development Authority approving a loan

for this project and to authorize the

expenditure of up to 2,567,52266

from the Ohio Water Development

Authority storm sewers fund and from the

storm sewer bond fund to pay for the

project. This project involves

improvements to an existing storm water

drainage basin in the Westland community

as well as the replacement of

inadequately sized storm sewers

downstream of the basin. Let me stop

there. See if any questions or comments

for my colleagues.

>> Seeing none, I move for passage.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks Barrosa de Padilla de Akaw Dors

Green Reie Ross Vice President Harden

>> pass.

>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance 0920

uh-20226

to authorize the director of the

department of finance and management to

associate all general budget

reservations resulting from this

ordinance with the appropriate universal

term contract purchase agreements for

the purchases of five dump trucks for

the department of public utilities from

VA Freightlininer Columbus Incorporated

and to authorize the admin the

expenditure of 1,219,05

to4 from within the water operating

fund.

Uh these dump trucks will be used to

transport excavating equipment as well

as uh haul materials such as dirt,

gravel, and sold to and from job sites.

Let me stop there. See if any questions

or comments from my colleagues. Seeing

none, I move for passage.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Banks Rosa Podia de Akawa, Dorance

Green, Remy Ross, Swice, President

Harden.

>> Passed.

>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance

0935-2026

to authorize the director of the

Department of Public Utilities to enter

into a contract renewal with the writer

company Incorporated for specialty

maintenance craft services to authorize

the expenditure of up to 1,520,000

from the electricity water sewage

operating fund and to declare an

emergency. Uh the work to be completed

under this contract includes the

cleaning, repair, maintenance, and

replacement of minor equipment at

various Columbus water and power

facilities. Emergency designation is

requested as the current contract will

expire on April 22nd, 2026. And it is

best to renew it before these uh

necessary services are disrupted. Let me

stop there. See if any questions or

comments from my colleagues. Seeing

none, I move for passage.

>> Clerk, please call the role.

>> Thanks. Deborrosa de Padilla de Akawa,

Dorance Green, Remy Ross, Vice President

Harton.

>> Passed. Thank you. Last, I have

ordinance 0936-2026

to authorize director of the Department

of Public Utilities, Columbus Water and

Power to modify a contract with Senegro

Central LLC for the

water treatment residuals turnkey

dewatering services project for the

division of water and to authorize an

expenditure of 12,400,000 from the water

operating fund. This contract provides

management services for water treatment

residuals stored at the McKinley Avenue

Corey. This includes services such as

the dewatering, processing, and

utilization of water treatment residuals

produced at all three of the city's

water plants. Let me stop there. See if

any questions or comments from my

colleagues. Seeing none, I move for

passage.

>> Please call the role.

>> Banks de Aoris Green Reie Ross Vice

President Harden

>> passed.

Thank you, council president. I would

hope that in the future I could go

first. That way I don't have to do this

so quickly.

>> I don't think that's how it works, sir.

>> But I that is all I have for my

committee this evening.

>> Good job.

>> If if there's no further business

accompanying for council, is there a

motion to adjourn?

>> Cler, please call the row.

>> Thanks, Denver Rosia de Aar. Dorren

Green, Remy W Remy Ross, Vice President

Hart.

>> Meeting is adjourned. Have a good

evening.