Regular meeting number 19 will now come
to order. Please stand for the playing
of the national anthem.
This evening we're going to do something
a little different. We have a live
version of the national anthem that will
be sang by Rose and Ketche. Rose,
welcome.
Oh, say
can you see
by the dawn
early
light,
what so proudly
we held
at the twilight
last gleaming
who sprouts stripes
and bright stars
through the perilous
fight.
Or the ramparts
we watched
were soently
streaming.
And the rockets
red glare.
The bombs bursting
in
gave proof
through the night.
That our flag
was still there.
Oh, say
does that star
spangled
that
yet
way
or the land
of the free
and the Home
of the
bra.
I hope you are free every Monday at 5:00
pm. Now going forward.
>> A thank you.
>> Council member Wise, would you lead us
in the pledge? Pledge allegiance to the
flag of the United States of America and
to the republic for which it stands, one
nation under God, indivisible, with
liberty and justice for all.
>> This evening I am so grateful to have uh
one of my dear friends, Rabbi Alex
Braver from Congregation's Terth, Israel
here to lead us in prayer. Rabbi,
welcome back to council.
Thank you.
In my tradition, in the Jewish
tradition, we hope and pray that the
work of our lawmakers and our leaders is
in furtherance of tedek, which means
justice in Hebrew. In Hebrew, tedek can
mean many things. Sedaka, for example,
from the same root commonly means
charity, whether that's giving spare
change or millions of dollars. And it
means that we give not only because we
are moved to or because it's a nice
thing but because it is sedc. It is an
obligation and part of what makes for a
just and righteous society.
Justice is also something that we are
commanded to pursue as in the book of
Deuteronomy which says turd justice
justice shall you pursue. It is
emphatic.
We must actively pursue it and seek it
out. not just hope that we stumble onto
it. It can feel like justice is always a
few steps ahead of us. And if we're not
sprinting after it, and if we're not
constantly in pursuit of it, and if it's
not our relentless focus, then it will
elude us.
At the same time, justice is also
something
that flows from God, something whose
progress is inevitable. It is God's
vision for our world. A vision that we
believe will eventually come to pass no
matter what obstacles stand in its way.
As the prophet almost declared in a
verse that is famously quoted by Dr.
King,
let justice well up like water and
righteousness like a mighty stream.
Rabbi Ibraham Joshua Hesshel who marched
with Dr. King and Selma spoke about this
same verse saying righteousness is not a
trickle. It is God's power in the world,
a torrent, an impetuous drive full of
grandeur and majesty.
And so we pray
Ovid Mishbat. Blessed is the source of
blessing and blessed is the one who
loves righteousness and justice.
May you bless this gathering with your
sense of tedic of righteousness and
justice.
Help those gathered here not just to
seek out justice, but to pursue it and
to chase after it and to not let it slip
away as it so often does. And at the
same time, bless all those gathered here
with the vision and the faith to see
that God's justice is also a mighty
stream and an inevitable force that will
with time sweep away all obstacles.
Give those gathered here the strength to
chase justice with all their strength
and with all their heart and all their
might. and to know that in the end with
your help and with our efforts justice
will always well up as a torrent of
grandeur and majesty. May it be God's
will. Amen.
>> And thank you so much Rabbi.
Clerk, please call the role.
>> Bank Rosa de Podia de Akawa Dorn Green
Remy Ross Vice President Harden. Any
person who takes any action to obstruct
or interfere with the conduct of
tonight's meeting may be charged with
disturbing a lawful meeting pursuant to
Columbus City Code 2317.12.
Any person who enters those areas of
city council chambers reserved for city
officials or invited guests may be
charged with criminal trespass pursuant
to Columbus City Code 2311.21.
>> Can I get a motion to dispense with the
reading of the journal?
>> Cler please call the role. Banks Debor
Rossa de Podia de Akaw Dors Green Remy
Ross Weiss President Harden
>> are there any additions or corrections
to the journal I hear none the journal
is approved this week's communications
received by the city clerk's office are
listed on the agenda and will be
published in the city bulletin are there
any other messages communicated
>> not at this time
>> thank you madame clerk we'll go around
the dis with uh updates and resolutions
by my colleague starting with council
banks
>> uh thank you uh president Harden I do
have uh just one announcement this
evening just as a reminder on Wednesday
April April 29th, I will be holding a
hearing to unveil and discuss the
steering committee's recommendations on
the establishment of the city's first
participatory budgeting pilot. Uh I am
uh looking forward to sharing all the
progress made on this initiative to date
and how residents can engage in this
process moving forward. All speakers
wishing to speak during the hearing in
person must email uh Jonathan Brown in
my office at jb browncolus.gov by 10:00
a.m. the day of the hearing with the
subject line participatory budgeting
hearing. Written testimony must also be
received by 10:00 a.m. on the day of the
hearing and emailed to Jonathan Brown
again at jbbrc columbus.gov. Each
speaker will be limited to remarks
lasting no longer than 3 minutes and as
of course will be streamed on all of our
uh channels uh for folks as well. Really
proud of the work uh that we've done so
far around participatory budgeting. This
has been a residentled effort um behind
the scenes and uh the committee has done
so much work. So we will be revealing
that guide book on how it will help
shape and guide us through this
participatory budgeting process as we
move through the year. So again looking
forward to having that discussion on
Wednesday, April 29th. Uh again uh
that's all I have. Council President,
thank you.
>> Thank you sir. Council member Rosadia.
>> Thank you council president. First of
all good evening everyone. It's so good
to see this council chamber full. How
many folks is this your first time in
council chambers?
Amazing. Democracy is a beautiful thing.
I hope it's not your last and I hope you
continue to come back for the things
that you care about. So, uh, this week
is traffic safety awareness week and I
think we have a little show and tell of
a flyer maybe perhaps. Yes. So, uh,
traffic safety week uh, we partner with
Columbus City Schools and Vision Zero.
Vision Zero is the idea that one day we
will have zero fatalities or serious
injuries due to crashes on our roadways.
This week, we're engaging students and
staff in conversations about safe ways
to travel to and from school. Throughout
the week, students will participate in a
variety of activities and programs
focused on pedestrian safety, bicycle
safety, and traffic awareness. So this
morning we kicked off uh traffic safety
week at Hiltonia Middle School where we
put in a flashing beacon on West Mound
Street. This was part of a larger um
traffic uh improvement project along
West Mound Street where we went from
four lanes to three lanes. We added a
turn lane, some other things to curb uh
speeding and other things along um West
Mound Street. So it was amazing to start
off our week with um students at
Hiltonia. Um secondly, this week is also
National Work Zone Awareness Week. And
really, uh this is just a reminder that
there's lots of construction happening
along our roadways. I know it's
frustrating for us, but it's our friends
and our neighbors who are working on
those roadways. So, paying attention,
locking in when you're driving to ensure
that as folks are on the roads that
we're thinking about their safety as
well. There have been opport or there
have been unfortunate incidences where
some of our folks have been hit by cars
or have been injured while they're
working uh doing those really important
infrastructure improvement projects
along the roadways. And then last but
not least, uh this April is National
Safe Digging Month in the city of
Columbus. So it's just this is a quick
reminder to all residents. You're going
to see this everywhere. As the weather
gets better, we want to work outside in
our gardens. We want to make home
improvements. So, make sure that you're
calling Ohio811.
It's a simple free step that helps
prevent injuries, protect property, and
keep our families and neighborhoods
safe. Whether you're a contractor or a
homeowner planting a tree, working in
your garden, uh calling 811 helps to
keep our entire community safe. Um so,
call, wait for utilities to be marked,
and then dig with care. Uh Director
Scott, did is there anything I've missed
or is there anything that you would like
to add? Lots of lots of good safety
reminders.
>> Good evening, President Harden, Chair
Burio, um members of council. You you
summarized it very well. Traffic safety
week, very important. We need to be sure
to be out there driving the speed limit.
um looking out for those kids walking
home from school or to school or to
biking or rec going to the rec centers
or libraries and just really um going
out there and
overall be safe driving.
>> And I just wanted to commend the
department. We were talking this
morning, there's 18 of our schools that
are somewhere within the high injury
network. And so that crosswalk, while it
seems like a little thing in terms of
safety, it is a really big thing in
terms of making sure that our kids, our
families are able to safely cross the
road. So these flashing beacons are the
big um crosswalks that flash. I know
folks are not used to them, but please,
please, please make sure that you're
paying attention. It's going to be a
lesson for all of us to learn, and
that's why uh traffic awareness week is
so important. I have two teenage drivers
in my house now. Um so as we're thinking
about them being on the road, training
them early for the things that they need
to watch out for to keep everyone safe
is incredibly important. So thank you
for your work. Um this is more to come,
especially as we think about safe walks
to school and how we in uh continue to
keep our kids safe. So that's all for me
this evening. Thank you, Council
President.
>> Thank you, Council Member Council Member
Deakau.
>> Thank you, Council President. I'm happy
to announce that I will be hosting a
second community meeting to discuss deer
management in the city and provide
further updates on our work and upcoming
legislation. This meeting will be held
in Clintonville at Wetstone Library on
Tuesday, May 5th from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m.
This meeting will be open to all, but
attendees are encouraged to RSVP as
space is limited. Um, more information
on how to RSVP will be announced on
council's social media page soon. And
also the moving day walk in support of
Parkinson's Foundation is this Sunday,
10:00 a.m. at Wolf Park. It is free to
participate in the walk and event info
can be found on my socials. That's all
for me.
>> Thank you, President Pro Tim.
>> Thank you, Council President. I want to
invite uh I do have one resolution. I'm
sorry. I should should have said that
first. uh wanted to invite uh David
Babner uh to the podium as I introduce
uh resolution number 0099X-20226
to recognize the 23rd uh annual how
health capital city half marathon. Um
this half marathon was founded right
here in Columbus back in 2004 and become
a spring right of passage for many
runners here in Columbus. I'm excited to
join near 11,000 uh of my fellow
residents being out there this weekend
running this race. Uh this has grown
into one of the largest and most
recognized half marathons across the
country. Uh the this is the third
straight year that the cap city has been
recognized as the second best um half
marathon according to USA Today. Uh and
I don't know what's going to take to
move us up to one, but you know, we'll
we'll go for that next year. Um, but
it's been a really great race and if if
folks that participated in the past know
what a great atmosphere is created by uh
the folks that put on this event and
certainly it's also served as just a
great place for partnership. Uh,
national organizations like black black
girls run have used this event as a
national meetup um for their members and
this year they're they're doing that as
well. Uh, also it's very exciting. This
body uh is deeply invested in the
Columbus Promise um the city partnership
to help provide uh free Columbus State
tuition to uh Columbus City School
students. Uh the 5K is branded under
that Columbus part or the the Columbus
Promise program to help raise money for
that integral program. Uh so wanted to
again every year be able to acknowledge
this great event that happens downtown.
uh and want to turn the mic over to
David talk a little bit more about the
importance of this race and sort of
what's going on this year. David.
>> Well, thank you very much uh Council
President Harden, President Proemp
Dorans, members of city council. Thank
you so much for the recognition tonight.
My name is David Babner. I'm the founder
and race director of M3S Sports and the
23rd annual Ohio Health Capital City
Half Marathon, Quarter Marathon, and as
Council Member Doran said, the Columbus
Promise 5K taking place this Saturday.
So, we are we are in Cap City Week now.
We'll Saturday the 25th at 8 a.m. we'll
kick off 11,000 runners through our
streets. I wanted to take just a few
minutes tonight to thank you for your
continued and unending support of our
team and the event. When we founded the
event back in 2004, my hair was a lot
darker. And our mission was to create
the best celebration of the healthy,
active lifestyle and help make Columbus
one of the best running and walking
communities in the country. This year,
we can't wait to welcome the 11,000
participants to our remarkable city for
an amazing tour of Columbus. Everyone's
invited and everybody's included at Cap
City. Each year the event continues to
bring in million do millions of dollars
of economic impact but more importantly
changes lives by engaging our community
in the healthy active lifestyle. We know
we have the best city in the country and
for now the third straight year cap city
has been recognized as being one of the
best half marathons in the country.
We could not do what we do without the
tremendous city services in Columbus who
give us unwavering support.
the division of police and division of
fire and all public safety. I know
deputy director speak is here tonight.
Thank you so much. Uh department of
public service and director Scott and
recreation and parks uh director Ree,
thank you so much for all your support
and everything you do for us and our uh
citizens and the community to be able to
produce an event like this. We
understand the important programs you
have developed and continue to develop
and we strive to support them. Since CAP
City was funded or founded, we've
supported the Capitol Kids After School
Program, the City Leaders Program, the
Columbus Promise Program, and now
starting this year, the Columbus Recken
Park Foundation.
Now, we have running groups and
organizations coming to CAP City on an
annual basis from all over the country,
and this year, four other countries. Uh
we are proud that Black Girls Run, one
of the largest national running groups
in the entire country, has selected the
Capitol City Half Marathon for the
second straight year uh for their
national meetup, bringing hundreds of
women from 27 different states around
the country here to Columbus.
I hope many of you will join us on
Friday, this Friday night for the
National Black Girls Run Welcoming
Reception as we celebrate women in
endurance sports. Women represent over
60% of the participants in Cap City and
at M3S Sports, we're excited to
celebrate along with them. And you also,
I know many of you will. I know Council
Member Dors is actually going to
participate and run with us on Saturday
morning, but I hope many of you, if not
all of you, will join me Saturday
morning uh at the event to jump up on
the stage with me and welcome all of our
participants and see why Cap City is one
of the best half marathons in the entire
country. On behalf of Ohio Health, all
our other partners, the Greater Columbus
Sports Commission, the 800 volunteers,
and the 11,000 participants, thank you
so much for the recognition and time
tonight. And if you thought Rose and
Ketche sang an amazing national anthem
in city council chambers, wait till you
hear her voice echo down High Street
from the stage that we built there. Uh
we're so excited to have Rosen to be not
only our national anthem singer, but one
of our ambassadors. Her husband Chris
Glover is here as well tonight. I know
Mark from council is one of our
ambassadors as well. It's pretty amazing
to stand here after 23 years and know
that this has really become something
that the city's proud of and it's an
honor and humbling just to be part of
it. So, thank you for the recognition. I
look forward to seeing everybody this
weekend.
>> Thank you, David. And you buried the
lead there. Uh, Rose's husband is not
just going to be participating, but I
don't know what costume he'll be wearing
this year. I don't know if the Superman
or which Avenger I think not. Yes,
Superman. All right.
Man runs an entire half marathon in a
Superman costume. I barely finished
these events and let alone a man out
there dressed as a superhero. Uh, but I
think it it leans into this. This is
such a festive atmosphere and such a
great race and really a showcase of the
city. Uh it's really an opportunity for
a lot of folks to have a lot of fun
downtown and again as you said sort of
really promote a healthy lifestyle and
it's really accessible when you talk
about uh there being a 5K a quarter
marathon which is really unusual. That's
sort of a tough race to to find out
there and then have that that that
halfarathon option for folks as well. If
folks are interested in throwing on the
running shoes is there still spots
available?
>> Absolutely. Capital cityalfmarathon.com.
We'd love to have them. They can
volunteer, participate. We don't care
how they participate. Just participate.
Run, walk, volunteer. We'd love to see
them out or cheer. It's amazing on these
23 years how organic a lot of our cheer
groups get when you run and you've
participated in the event a number of
times. We'll from every one of the of
the communities that we run through.
It's amazing how many people come out
and cheer on the runners and runners and
walkers. So, yes, absolutely. Capital
cityalfmarathon.com with all the
information. Uh, council mayor,
>> I just also wanted to share I'm so
excited about um Black Girls Run being
part having such a big role this year in
the marathon. Um, quick fun fact, in
1967, the first woman snuck into the
Boston Marathon. She actually registered
under a name that could have been a
male's name and ran the marathon. That
was 59 years ago this year. So kind of
crazy that within our lifetimes uh we
did not believe that women could
physically run a marathon and now 60% of
the women or 60% of our runners are
women. So uh just a fun fact to
celebrate how far we have come and uh
what this marathon means. So
>> and thank you and and M3s sports
produces 15 different events in
Columbus. We touch about 55,000 race
registrations a year and those numbers
of 60% female hold true across all
platform of events.
Thank you, council member. And again,
last thing I'll say, I'm just really
excited about that partnership with the
recreation parks foundation again to
help raise money for, you know, our kids
across Columbus to make sure that
they're having access to youth sports
and all the things that are so near and
dear to the recreation park. So, just
really excited to see that partnership
come together. Uh, and if there's no
other comments, I would like to move for
adoption.
>> Bankston, Barrosa, Deodia, de a dors,
Remy Ross, Vice President Harden.
Thanks, Council President. That's all I
have.
>> Thank you, President Pro Tim. Council
member Green,
Council Member Remy.
Thank you very much,
>> Council President. There we go. Um, I
just got two quick announcements. I
have, um, where are my notes right now?
I have a short-term rental um hearing
tomorrow afternoon here in chambers that
will begin at 3:30. If anybody has any
um public testimony or would like to
speak, please get in touch with my aid
Pedro Mahia um at
um Columbus.gov. So pdmah
columbus.gov. That's PDMJ
at columbus.gov by noon tomorrow. and he
will make sure that you are signed up.
Also, I'd like to uh remind people that
um our annual cleanup for Cleaner
Columbus is um the fifth annual Cleaner
Columbus citywide cleanup will be on May
9th. We hope to see you and your
organizations there. They will be um you
can uh sign up at cleaner Columbus.org.
We will be working across the city on
May 9th. So, please go to
cleanercolus.org to sign up. Thank you
very much, Council President. That's all
I have.
>> Council member, council member Ross.
>> Thank you, Council President. We just
had one resolution on the agenda, but I
am going to request that we uh postpone
resolution 00958-2026
to recognize and celebrate April as fair
housing month in Columbus. We are still
celebrating it, but we are going to wait
to present said resolution until next
Monday on the agenda. So would like to
move to postpone.
>> Second.
>> Cler, please call the role. Banks Timber
Rosa deodia de a dors green remy ros
president Harden
>> postponed
>> thank you that's it from the
>> thank you council member w
>> thank you council president I have one
announcement and one resolution
resolution this evening uh first I'm
excited to share that our next act with
us volunteer opportunity will be taking
place this Saturday April 25th from 10
a.m. to 12 p.m. In honor of Earth Month,
in partnership with a step in the right
direction, we'll be meeting at the
corner of North Chase A and Steel A to
clean up litter in the North Hilltop
neighborhood. All are welcome to join.
You can learn more and RSVP at
columbus.govactwith
us. Uh next, I would like to invite John
McNamera, board president, and Colin
Simpson, uh board member of Green
Columbus, to the podium. Um, Green
Columbus, a local sustainably focused
nonprofit dedicated to increasing tree
canopy coverage in Columbus and central
Ohio. Um, as they come forward, I want
to introduce resolution 006 uh, I'm
sorry, 0096X-2026
to recognize and celebrate April as
Earth Month and Wednesday, April 22nd as
Earth Day in Columbus, Ohio. Earth Month
is an incredibly meaningful time for me.
It is an opportunity to advocate for our
environment, champion sustainable policy
and practices, and encourage individual
and collective action to protect our
planet. Given decision at the federal
level to roll back necessary climate
protections, the role of local
governments and communities to protect
and advocate for our environment has
become more important. I've been lucky
enough to spend a large part of this
month out in community participating in
litter cleanups, community garden
workdays, and tree plantings. And I'm
incredibly moved by the dozens of
community leaders and members that have
spent time um this month who are
actively standing up for our environment
and implementing sustainable practices
in their own neighborhoods. Uh John and
Colin, I I want to thank you both for
being here this evening to accept this
resolution. We are so grateful for the
incredible work of Green Columbus um and
what they do for our community and for
environmental advocacy um not only in
honor of Earth Day and Earth Month, but
all year long. Thank you for the work
you're doing to engage the community and
facilitating massive volunteer efforts
in increasing our city's tree canopy.
Before I move for adoption, would you
like to share a few words?
>> If you don't mind. Uh good evening, uh
Council President Harden, Council
members. My name is John McNamera and I
have the privilege of serving as the
board president for Green Columbus.
Thank you for this recognition and a
special thank you to you, Council Member
Christopher W, for your support and for
helping highlight this work. I'm truly
grateful to be here representing the
thousands of central Ohio residents who
are in our neighborhoods making a real
difference this month. Green Columbus is
powered by dedicated volunteers. And
together, this community that we have
grown shows up by planting thousands of
trees, leading neighborhood cleanups,
and creating healthier, more connected
spaces across our city. Since 2007,
Green has helped plant over 300,000
trees. And every fall, we give away
3,000 free trees so residents can
continue to that impact in their own
backyards. Trees that improve health,
reduce utility bills, and grow the
beauty of this city we love. Each April,
that community spirit comes to life
through our Earth Month Volunteer
Program, which has been recognized as
the nation's largest volunteer-driven
Earth Month effort. This past year, more
than 5,000 volunteers contributed over
22,000 hours, over 170 work sites. All
of that work culminates at our Green
Columbus Earth celebration where we
recognize and thank our volunteers while
bringing the broader community together.
I'd like to invite all council members
and staff to join us this Sunday, April
26th at Sciota Autobon Metrop Park from
11 to 7. This free community event will
feature over 80 local vendors, live
music, food trucks, educational
demonstrations, and plenty of
opportunities to get involved. If anyone
would like to get more involved, you can
find more information at green
seabus.org or follow us on our social
media. Thank you again for this
recognition and supporting the people
who are making Columbus a cleaner,
greener, and stronger community. Thank
you,
>> John. Thank you for being here for the
advocacy and for the work that Green
Columbus does. Um, I had the pleasure of
joining them for a tree planting on the
west side. Sadly, I was like 30 minutes
late and they had already planted how
many trees in that short amount?
>> 500 trees. The Hispanic Coalition works
fast. It was impressive and it was
impressive work to see all that done. I
got to get my photo up. I did plant one.
So, there is one tree that I have to go
back and look at 10 years from now. Um,
any uh council member deco,
>> thank you so much for doing real things.
Real things out there planting trees.
Some folks talk, you guys do. Year after
year, you deliver. And so, I appreciate
that. so much. So, thank you. Thank you
for all the work you do.
>> Thank you, council member.
>> All right. Anyone else thoughts? Uh,
with that, I move for adoption.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Bankston Barosa Deodia de AOA Dorn Remy
Ross Weiss, President Harden.
>> Adopted.
Thank you, council member. Um, I think
it's my only announcement, but um, this
is the first council meeting that we
have had since uh, auditor Megan Kilgore
has announced that she's taken an
amazing amazing um, opportunity uh, for
her and her family. And um you know, I
told her told this to her privately uh
earlier this week or last week that she
had just about the largest of shoes to
step into uh following Mr. Dorian. And
not only did she fill those shoes out,
she um stewarded our city in such an
amazing and steady way for the last
eight years. Would you help me uh be the
first in a public way to celebrate her
and thank her for her leadership?
Now, this is not the day where we go
around the dis and cry and stuff that
will come. Um, but I I would um want to
offer the floor to uh Megan uh and then
talk just about the application process
uh after that. Thank you.
President Hart and members of council,
thank you. Um, you are right. My
predecessor had pretty much won every
single award available in this country,
but um, the big one was that he had
earned a medal from the Pope himself.
And so I knew going in was very, very
big shoes to fill. Um, but I uh, you
know, I believe very firmly that the
right time to transition is when an
office is at its peak. And that is, I'm
very proud to say really where it is
today. And because um, of the kind of
magnitude of of how few auditors we've
had, believe it or not, we've only had
eight.
I'd like to share, if you um will allow
me, just a few uh, reflections as you
consider this appointment, which is
which is of course yours. The city
auditor in many ways is the quiet
backbone of a lot of things. I say we
kind of keep the lights on of our of our
city. Our office is responsible for
managing billions of dollars, overseeing
some of the most complex financial
systems you can think of and also
maintaining the trust of external
partners from Wall Street to Mainstream.
And in many ways, our office because of
its scale, it really operates similar to
that of a Fortune 500, but with the
added twist of public accountability and
the relationships that we have to
maintain and the credibility, they're
not abstract, and they're certainly not
earned overnight. They've been built
upon years and years. And it affects
everything from our city's cost of
borrowing. Every single time we go out
and issue a, you know, a million-doll
project of bonds, every single 01% that
we can save means more dollars for
council and the mayor to make decisions
with that go directly to our
neighborhoods and our residents. And so
Columbus is in this really incredible
position that few cities in our country
have the opportunity to occupy and
frankly most envy. and that is we have
the highest credit ratings possible. We
have an incredibly strong set of
financial systems and we have a
nationally recognized modern
high-performant office infrastructure
and that really did not happen by
accident. It has taken a lot of
technical expertise, a lot of knowledge
as to the market and certainly the
broader geopolitical systems that every
single day can influence what we have to
do in our day's work. It also very
sincerely reflects the historical
importance that I think council and the
mayor and my colleagues across this city
have placed on this office. As I shared,
there have only been eight auditors, but
believe it or not, the three before me
were all appointed by council because of
their respective expertises. It's a
really, really interesting history. But
for those individuals who served for
almost I think 82 years, they all came
from positions of national and state
leadership. And so, you know, as I I I
really request your support and
participation as you think about who is
next and who is going to be best to live
lead the city, you know, forward. I must
also acknowledge that like my
predecessor, we probably didn't do a
really good job of always making our
work as visible as we could. We didn't
always show behind the scenes what all
is being done. I think it's sexy, but I
do respect deeply that not everyone else
does. Much of what we do happens behind
the scenes. It's complex. It's highly
technical, and it doesn't always
translate easily. So, I I just bet you
know how deeply consequential it is. So
as you consider this appointment, I I
took a step back and I thought about
what are the factors that I think have
historically mattered the most. And they
would be very quickly experience in
public finance, capital markets and debt
issuance. We are the face of Wall
Street. Established relationships with
rating agencies, bond holders, folks who
are going to be doing business and
trying to help us finance things like
our clean drinking water. And very very
importantly, because the city currently
holds the highest marks for management,
an absolutely perfect score in our
financial management, I would really ask
um your consideration as you look at the
candidates that will come before you.
Can this potential appointee
walk into the role on day one and add
credibility to this conversation? And I
really, really, really want to commit
anything that I can do to help you in
this transition, anything that I can do
to provide context to the role, what we
do, I will be your partner this week,
next week, whatever I can do to help.
Thank you so much for caring really.
There are a lot of people upstairs in
the balcony who are really, really on
pins and needles about the next steps
and um committed to doing what I can.
Council President, thank you.
I almost said don't leave.
Um, so council is accepting. Thank you,
Megan. Seriously, thank you for your
leadership. Thank you for your
friendship. Uh council is accepting
applications to fill the upcoming
vacancy in the office of the city
auditor following uh auditor Megan
Kilgore's announcement that she will
step down on May 4th, 2026. Uh
interested residents are encouraged to
apply using the form on council's
website. Applications will be accepted
through Thursday, April 23rd at 12:00
p.m. And just to be clear, and this
might even be a question for um Mr.
bias. One of the reasons why this might
seem like an extremely tight turnaround,
it is because it is our understanding
that charter says that uh we cannot be
without a auditor. And so when uh
Auditor Kilgore told us the date she
would like to to to leave, we are
working our very best to make uh sure
that in very short order, we run a open
and transparent process that will allow
us to have an auditor in place so that
you um as you certainly have the right
to do can um make your transition. And
so uh is that is that our understanding?
Okay. Well, thank you again, uh, Auditor
Kilgore. And like I said, there will be,
I'm sure, many, well, not I'm sure we
will be a part of the many, um,
recognitions and celebrations of your
service to, uh, our community over, um,
the last, um, really decade or so, uh,
more than decade if you've been in this
building. So, thank you. Uh, are there
any other comments by elected officials,
uh, treasure, city attorney's office?
Are there any requests by members of
council for the removal of an ordinance
or resolution from the consent portion
of the agenda? Hearing none, may we now
have a motion to wave readings of the
titles of 30-day legislation by the city
clerk.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Thanks, Temper Rosa Deodia de AOA, Dors
Green, Remy Ross, Vice President Harden.
>> Thank you. Will the clerk now read to
the record the ordinance numbers of
30-day legislation on tonight's agenda
for first reading? Public Service and
Transportation Committee, we have
ordinance 924 and 1032-2026.
Neighborhoods, Recreation, and Parks
Committee, we have ordinance 956-2026.
Housing, Homelessness, and Building
Committee, Ordinance 1059-2026.
Public Utilities, and Sustainability
Committee Resolution 82X-2026.
Ordinances 673, 689, and 996-2026.
Zonings we have ordinance 290 1035 and
1136-2026.
Variances we have ordinance 291 1036
1116 1137 1139 and 1143-2026.
>> Thank you uh madame clerk. Uh the
following ordinance appear on our agenda
as consent action. Will the clerk read
those into the record? Resolutions of
expression 102X,
92X, 97X, 98X, 106X, 107X, 94X, and
101X-2026.
And finance and governance committee, we
have ordinance 746, 1002, 1018, 1098,
1131-2026,
economic development and small and
minority business committee. We have
ordinances 961 and 952-2026.
Public service and transportation
committee. We have ordinance 937-2026.
Neighborhoods recreation and parks
committee. We have ordinance 679-2026.
Health I'm sorry, health, human
services, and equity committee. We have
ordinance 1007, 1011, and 1014-2026.
Public Safety and Criminal Justice
Committee, Ordinance 901, 977, and
978-2026.
Housing, Homelessness, and Building
Committee, Ordinance 926, 9990, 9993,
and 11:01-2026.
Public Utilities, and Sustainability
Committee, we have ordinance 878, 893,
9992, 942, 9992, 1013, and 1038-2026.
appointments we have A32 and A80-2026.
>> Thank you, Madame Clerk. Um, are there
any questions or comments on the consent
portion of the agenda? Hearing none, may
we have a motion of approval of these
items designated as consent.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks Tim Barrosa Deodia de Aar Dors
Green Remy Ross Vice President Harden.
>> Consent agenda is passed. We'll now
proceed with the second reading of
30-day postponed emergency legislation.
However, we will go out of order this
evening and start with ordinance 0920
uh 23-226 and rules and policy. I chair
this committee, but I'll turn it over to
council member Bankston. Council member,
the floor is yours.
>> Uh thank you, uh council president. Yes,
on page 16 of our rules and policy
committee. Uh, I have tonight ordinance
0923-2026
to enact 4515
of the Columbus city codes to create
okay to create a rental uh to create a
registry of residential rental
properties. Uh, council members, uh, as
you all know, over the last nine months,
my office held a robust community
engagement process to discuss the
establishment of a city rental registry.
The purpose of this registry is to give
the city a proactive datadriven tool to
manage the health and safety of our
housing stock and protect our most
vulnerable. Tonight, I ask that you join
me in taking this monumental step in
ensuring that no matter your income or
zip code, that you can find and live in
safe, healthy housing in the city. The
structure of the registry is simple.
Every residential rental property in
Columbus must register annually and must
share information such as a named local
operator and emergency contact for
property uh number of dwelling units,
all partial IDs associated with the
property and information on shared
mechanical systems and shared spaces.
Every three years, our department of
building and zoning services will
conduct a free preventative education
inspection of exterior common exteriors
and common areas and shared systems if
they exist. Think of these again as
checkins meant to educate, identify
concerns, and refer serious life safety
issues to the appropriate agencies.
Properties with uh uh repeated code
violations, unresolved safety orders, or
public nuisance designations will be
given conditional registration status
that triggers mandatory common area
inspections. Inspections of up to 10% of
units required remediation plans and
daily occurring civil penalties until
violations are addressed. This is meant
to address the worst of the worst
problem properties uh and owners. Uh
there is a fee and the fee uh for the
registry will be $15 a unit capped at
$1,500 for a single property. And think
about this, that is the amount to a
$1.20 a month per unit over the course
of a year and even less if you have over
100 units thanks to the cap. And I
believe that that is a fair price for
accountability. Throughout our
stakeholder engagement process, we
received a lot of feedback both for for
and against this proposal. Opponents of
this uh proposal cited concerns about
costs over complications and
duplications. And let me be clear as
chair of the economic development small
business committee. I heard and
empathized with those concerns as our
housing providers are small businesses
in many cases. Uh they are part of the
small business ecosystem. And so
throughout that process, we made many
changes uh to the rental registry that
you see today and heard their feedback
in earnest. In addition to all of that,
we made sure to engage our partners in
the Franklin County auditor's office
throughout this process to ensure that
this registry also made sense to them
given their ownership of the
statemandated registry that is held at
the county. Uh before I go on and I know
we do have some speakers. I do want to
have some clarifying uh questions here
of both Director Messer and Director
Stevens because this was truly a
partnership between building and zoning
as well as our department of
development. Uh Director uh Messer, you
know, we've heard folks claim that this
registry is really duplicative and
unnecessary. Can you just speak to where
the county auditor is on this proposal?
Council member Council Member Banks and
uh President Harden, other members of
council, thank you um for your uh
partnership and first of all in creating
uh this legislation and bringing it to
where we are. Uh it's been a pleasure to
work with your office and the open and
transparent uh process was um very
wellreceived I think. Um let me just say
that in terms of the um county
registration, it is a little different.
The county registration is um uh does
not contain some of the same information
that we're going to be requiring in this
uh registry. There's no inspection
process and largely uh it's it's a
one-time uh voluntary registration. Um
but we heard the concerns of of folks
that there would be duplication and
registering with the county and with the
city. And we have uh engaged with um uh
auditor staniano's office and we have a
letter of intent that we've agreed to
where we will share information and work
to techn technology-wise to integrate
the registries so that folks who
register with one or the other that
information can be shared to try to cut
down on the uh I guess administrative uh
challenge or burden that applicants
might uh have. So, um, so for example,
if you've already registered with, um,
the county auditor's office, a lot of
that information may automatically
populate in your registry with the city
so that you wouldn't have to duplicate
those efforts and entering all that same
information and vice versa. Um, but to
be clear, you would still be required to
register with the city of Columbus under
the new registry. uh but that
partnership with the county auditor
would allow a lot of that data and
information to automatically flow
between the two entities.
>> Thank you for that, director. And then I
think the other thing I just want to
highlight um here in this space again
when costs are introduced I think
there's natural uh push back from folks
that there's costs I think uh increasing
uh everywhere around us but it does cost
to run this type of program. Can you
just talk about the philosophy around
the $15 uh and the max uh and how those
dollars will be utilized?
>> Sure, council member. Um, one thing that
I'm not sure I might have missed in your
remarks, but you know, the original
proposal uh actually uh thought about a
fee of $40 per unit. We have
significantly decreased that fee down to
$15 per unit uh in light of some of the
uh back and forth with uh various
stakeholders. Um but that $15 per unit
is going to go to uh several different
areas. One, um there is definitely
technology that's involved in this. Um
our intention is to make this uh as easy
as a process as possible, largely being
online with the use of technology, folks
being able to register uh very simply
and easily and pay their fees directly
online. Um we have um other registries
that this um uh registry will integrate
with so that data sharing and
information and mapping across the city
uh will be very helpful and advantageous
once we have the registry up and
running. So there is a cost to the
technology side of implementing this.
There's also going to need to be some
staffing both on the administrative side
as well as on the enforcement side and
the inspection piece that you mentioned
earlier um which will be free of charge
to the um customer um comes at a cost to
us um as well and so we will be
implementing um all three of those
areas.
>> Thank you for that. Uh and then I want
to go to our department of development
uh director Stevens I know that uh you
all are on the front lines of housing.
continue to speak to how this data that
we will now have, how will that help
inform uh the city's housing strategy?
>> Good evening, President Harden, Chair
Banks, members of council. As you know,
our housing strategy is to build more
units, invest in the market, invest
where the market does not, preserve the
naturally occurring affordability, as
well as include all residents. So, we
will use this data from the um rental
registry to help our h division of
housing stability who are serving our
residents every day and make sure that
they are not being exploited by
landlords and property owners.
>> Thank you, uh, director. Uh, and
speaking about front lines, we do also
have with us today Michael Edwards from
Legal Aid. I'm going to ask him to come
at this time.
There he is. I saw people moving in the
balcony. I thought you was in the
balcony. Michael, I was about to say
it's going have to fill a buster here
till you get down here.
>> Uh, council actually, can I just step
in? Um, we have room in 225 if anybody
would like to go to 225 and sit down. It
is being live streamed in uh there as
well. It's just right outside the door
if folks would like a seat.
>> Sorry, council member.
>> No, no problem. Thank you, Council
President, for that housekeeping. Um,
again, I want to invite Michael uh just
to give some remarks. I know you were
with legal aid and on the front lines
for us enforcing uh our housing um um
equity in the city. So, I'll turn it
over to you, Michael.
>> Thank you, Councilman, and thank you to
the C council a whole um thank you to
the members of the city council for your
leadership in advancing this rental
registry ordinance. Um this legislation
reflects an important truth. Columbus is
no longer a small and midsize rental
market. It functions like a major
metropolitan housing system and as such
it requires the appropriate tools to
ensure accountability, transparency and
basic habitability. To ground this in
real terms, I want to briefly describe
what this ordinance means on the ground.
Right now, my colleagues and I are
working with tenants in a large rental
property where conditions are simply
unacceptable.
non-working air conditioning and
furnaces, structural issues, and
deteriorating exterior conditions. These
are not isolated complaints.
They are widespread, repeated, and
ongoing. When we try to identify the
owner, we often find an only an LLC
listed on the auditor's website. There
is no there is no human point of
contact, no accountable decision maker.
So, what happens next? We gather tenant
letters requesting repairs. We represent
tenants in rent escro cases. And only
when rent stops flowing does the true
owner emerge, appearing in escro court.
And only then do serious repair
discussions begin. That is the current
system. It is reactive.
It is inefficient and it places the
burden on tenants, often low-income
tenants, to force accountability through
legal processes. This ordinance begins
to fix that by requiring clear ownership
information and creating a structured
registration system. It allows tenants,
advocates, and the city to engage
property owners earlier in the process
before conditions deteriorate into
crisis and before escort becomes the
only visible tool. The preventative
education inspection program, which is
part of this ordinance, is another
strong step forward. It shifts the
system from reactive enforcement to
proactive engagement, modeling other
major cities by identifying problems
earlier, informing owners of their
obligations, and generating data that
can reveal patterns of neglect that are
currently invisible.
And importantly, the conditional
registration status provision introduces
real leverage for tenants. When
properties accumulate repeated code
violations, they are flagged and
subjected to increased scrutiny. This is
critical. It means tenants by simply
using existing tools, calling 311,
requesting inspections can trigger
consequences that owners cannot ignore.
That is meaningful shift in power.
But I want to be very clear, the
effectiveness of this new ordinance will
depend on how these mechanisms function
in practice. First, retaliation remains
a serious barrier. The ordinance assumes
tenants will will contact code
enforcement about unressed housing
conditions. However, even with the
city's retaliation ordinance in place,
many will remain afraid to do so. They
fear eviction, lease non-renewal, or
other forms of retaliation. Continuing
to explore stronger tenant protections
and increasing enforcement of the city's
current retaliation ordinance will help
ensure that vulnerable and easy
intimidated tenants will request repairs
and call 311 if necessary instead of
call instead of silently enduring poor
housing conditions in a state of fear.
Second,
there is the question of enforcement
pressure and discretion. The conditional
registration threshold is powerful, but
it may also create unintended pressure
on code enforcement officers. When a
single addition when a single additional
violation can place a property on the
conditional registration list, there is
a risk whether real or perceived that
enforcement decisions become more
cautious. Ensuring that enforce that
officers are fully supported in making
objective consistent determinations will
reduce this risk.
Third, the small owner exemption opens
the possibility of a loophole. An owner
with 10 or fewer units is not required
to designate a local operator. In
practice, this could mean an out ofstate
owner with no meaningful local presence
or a developer placing multiple small
properties into separate LLC's can seek
to avoid accountability altogether.
This could leave tenants trying to
resolve serious conditions with someone
hundreds or thousands of miles away and
can undermine one of the core goals of
this ordinance, which is improving
visibility.
In closing, I want to emphasize this.
This ordinance is a major step in the
right direction. Columbus is a major
metropolitan city now, and we need
visibility into the condition of rental
housing to protect the safety of our
residents. This is not just about data
registration or compliance systems. It
is about whether tenants can live in a
safe habitable habitable housing without
having to initiate legal action just to
get basic repairs. It is about whether
accountability is proactive or only
triggered by crisis. And it is about
whether the city is willing to continue
building on this foundation to close the
gaps that experience will inevitably
reveal.
This is a strong and necessary step
forward that will help Columbus tenants.
On behalf of Lasco, we thank the council
for the hard work that went into this
legislation and we appreciate the
commitment to examining it and refining
it over the coming years.
>> Thank you.
>> Uh thank you, Michael.
Thank uh thank you Michael. Thank you
for legal aid and the work that you all
are doing every single day in our
communities down at the eviction court.
Uh it makes a a real difference and I
think you stole my thunder there at the
end which is in this legislation. we
have a review period where we will
review this uh and continue to make sure
uh that it evolves and works for our
city because our city is evolving and I
appreciate you all being at uh there
with us as we continue to look at this.
So, thank you again.
>> Thank you, sir.
>> We also do have um u public speakers in
support of this. So, I'm going to call
them at this time as well. First is Jeff
Coll and followed by Miss Julianne
Johnson if they can come in that order.
and Mr. Kovville, welcome back to
council. Your name, or any organization
you're representing, you have three
minutes.
>> President Harden, council members, my
name is Jeff Kovll. I'm a Columbus
resident and I am a landlord. I endorse
this proposed rental registry. I'd like
to tell you why. There are some
professions that arouse negative
feelings that may not generally be
justified, but there are enough bad
apples that negativity abounds. Think
you car salesman and yes, landlords.
I'd like to be proud when I say I am a
landlord. This proposal eliminates some
of the reasons why landlords are often
looked at poorly. The rental registry
proposal is more than reasonable.
The fee is so low as to be laughable.
The requirement to identify the owner,
to have local contact for emergencies
and repairs, any property owner who
resists this is not responsible and
deserves closer scrutiny by the city.
Knowing who to call locally for problems
and emergencies is just common sense.
a city inspector looking around the
exterior and common areas every 3 years.
Come on, other landlords. What are you
afraid of?
Does this registry duplicate the county?
No. The county registry is not enforced.
I had unregistered properties for years
before I even knew the county registry
existed. No one called. No one contacted
me. One more reason for my support, my
tenants. My tenants provide me with
income. They deserve to be treated
fairly on a business level. I deserve
timely payment. My tenants deserve
clean, safe housing and a local contact
in order to report problems. Thank you.
Thank you. Um, thank you, Jeff. And I
know that you've been outspoken and uh
been at this process every step of the
way. So, thank you for your continued
advocacy. Uh, next is Miss Julianne
Johnson.
>> Thank you, Councilman Bagston, President
Harden, and Council members. I'm here on
behalf of a Haitian uh immigrant family
who I've been working with who who um
doesn't can't take the risk of coming
forward. So, my name is Julianne
Johnson. I live in the east side of
Columbus. I'm a member of Redeemer
Lutheran Church on James Road and uh
near Scotwood um and an active member of
bread. I am here to speak in favor of
the registry. For the past year, our
church has been helping im Asian im
Haitian immigrants that are in our
community.
I have particularly been involved with a
family with a a couple with two
children, one six years old and the
other five months old. They live in
apartment complex that has four
buildings of about 35 apartments each in
on the east side of Columbus. Although
I'm retired now, my career was spent
advocating for people with disabilities.
I get how systems work and don't work
for people, especially those living on
the margins.
I have intervened for this family when
they got an eviction notice, which when
I researched it was based only on a late
fee they didn't know about because their
check didn't get to Cleveland when they
turned it in at the local office.
I intervened when they got had no heat
in early December when the baby was less
than two weeks old. I intervened one
month that their rent had been stolen by
an office staff person
and they were again charged.
The common areas of their building which
are not secured are filthy and in
illrepair. people gather there with
arguments, drinking, smoking, whatever.
Uh on very frequent occasions, they have
tried unsuccessfully
to to address their issues
themselves, which is what they'd prefer
to do.
It's not been successful without
somebody else intervening. So, I go to
the office now every two or three months
and frankly use my privilege to get
things they should be able to get for
themselves.
This family takes real risks living
daytoday in this city as immigrants. I
urge you to pass this rental registry.
Give them and others another tool to
handle the issues they face. Thank you
very much.
Miss Johnson,
Miss Johnson.
Miss Johnson.
Miss Johnson, I know you probably
couldn't hear me over the thunderous
applause. I think council member Rosa
Depia had a comment or question for you.
>> I did. I just um I just wanted to say
thank you. I wanted to say thank you
because um you know I think when you
talk about people living on the margins,
I think um language attainment is still
a challenge. You know, my parents came
to this country in 1970 when there was
no ESL. my sisters went to school and
completely learn in English classrooms
where they spoke 100% Spanish and people
spoke 100% English you know um if it was
not but for community members like
yourself and other people who reached
out and who were the spokesperson who
could break down systems for them who
could translate things for them that
wouldn't have happened and that's the
work that you're doing that's the work
that Brett is doing and I think that
that is part of the goal with this
rental registry I I think when we think
about I think often times when we put
policies into place and sometimes when
it feels like the people most affected
are like wait a minute what is this
going to do for us they don't realize
we're not talking about them if you're
doing the right thing we are talking
about the people who aren't doing the
right thing and there's too many of them
that are not there's too many of them
that are taking advantage of our
families there's too many of them that
when people are scared scared and
vulnerable that they don't have someone
who's showing for them. And so I
appreciate you being that voice because
I think that this is what is driving the
growth in our city. And so continuous
continuing to be a voice for those
folks, continuing to be a voice for a
community that can't always show up for
themselves, can't always advocate for
themselves is incredibly um important,
especially at this time. So I think as
we talk about especially as we talk
about tenants rights these this
community and not just Haitian wherever
you come from in the world are some of
the folks who are getting most taken
advantage of and so I just want to thank
you for bringing that perspective into
the conversation because it is taking up
care of everyone and if we take care of
the people furthest from justice then
all boats will rise and we ensure that
everyone is just we ensure that a system
is is accessible to everyone. So, I just
wanted to just say thank you for for
being here tonight and thank you for
continuing to advocate for that family
and you um are my neighbor because I
live right off of James Road. So,
>> and every time I go I'm aware of how
many other people don't have somebody to
step in for them and how I can't do
that. But um but there are many people
who don't have the privilege of having
somebody that they've they've made a
contact with and can can do it.
>> 100 100%. And they're not always here.
Yeah.
>> And they don't know to come down here
and they don't know to be that voice.
And so
>> for them, too.
>> Yeah. So, thank you.
>> Thank you.
Thank you. Uh thank thank you again,
Miss Julian. And I also just want to
shout out and thank uh Bred uh as well,
the organization who has been working
tirelessly uh on this and partnering
with us. I especially want to thank them
because I said early on that uh
legislation is many times about
compromise and when there were things in
there that they uh didn't get they
advocated for, they still stayed at the
table, still leaned in, uh still helped
us get to this and strengthen this. And
so I want to thank Bred uh and all their
members for all the work they're doing.
I see some of the leadership here. So I
just wanted to call that out and thank
you. Um before I move on to my final
comments and passage, are there any
questions or comments from my colleagues
either for speakers or for uh the
administration? I know that I think some
of my colleague Council Ross.
>> Sure. Thank you. Um Chair Bankston, I do
have a question for the Department of
Development within the Division of
Housing Stability. What is your plan to
address I think what uh our partners at
legal aid very succinctly called uh the
inability to be proactive if folks are
not willing to engage code enforcement.
Um are you looking to do education? Are
you looking to um connect with
communities and connect with residents
and tenants in the community to let them
know about this resource build rapport
so they are feeling more comfortable
calling code enforcement?
>> Um thank you President Harden. Council
member Ross, members of council, yeah,
as we set up our division of housing
stability, how we go out and engage with
our residents is going to be critical to
the success of that work. So, with our
partners at legal aid, CSB, others, um,
the programs we develop in the in the
outreach is going to be an important
aspect of that.
>> Do you anticipate the new administrator
of the division to be kind of leading
that charge?
>> Yes.
Council Council member
>> just along those lines I think I don't I
I don't want to make any assumptions but
we are thinking about just what our next
speaker our last speaker talked about
how are they culturally competent how
are they bilingual how are we reaching
out in those specific instances so when
we can ensure that we can have those
conversations with because as we know um
and I think you said it best these are
small business owners and so they come
from many different backgrounds So
ensuring that's part of our thinking.
Yes.
>> Yes.
>> Any other questions or comments?
>> Council member Roomie.
>> Thank you very much, Chair. I appreciate
the work that you put into this. Um I
want to start by saying, you know, I
understand exactly what this legislation
is trying to do. We all want to hold bad
landlords accountable and I appreciate
the work that has gone into getting this
ordinance to a much better place. I
understand where my colleagues are
coming from, but I have made my concerns
known throughout that at the end of the
day, I do not believe this version gets
us all the way there. So for me, it
still places too much administrative
burden on the overwhelming majority of
responsible property owners who are
doing the right thing in an effort to
get at the small number who are not. So
I think we've made real progress. I
think this conversation has been
valuable and ongoing and I think the
goal is the right one, but I also think
good intentions do not automatically
make for good policy. So tonight, I'll
be voting no. Not because I oppose
accountability, but because I believe we
still need a more targeted approach that
better focuses on bad actors without
creating unnecessary burdens for
everyone else. Thank you, Chair.
>> Uh thank you, Council Member Reie. And I
think there was something said uh with
you both about this idea of
predictability. I just want to that
folks that this is the first piece.
there's going to be other pieces that
come um down the line particularly when
we talk about the fee schedule. Uh and
so I know one of the things that I am
going to be looking forward to and
working with the department uh is around
ensuring that that fee is frozen if at
least for the first three years as we go
through this pilot uh to ensure some
predictability. And so we will have
those conversations as we get to that uh
uh point because that fee is not here
today and some other pieces uh those are
other subsequent pieces of legislation
that will come down the line. So, thank
you for your comments, Council
President.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, as we were
going through this conversation, it it
dawned on me that um both Chair Ross of
the housing committee and myself as
former chair of the housing uh homeless
committee are also part of the uh
renters caucus. Uh we rent here in
Columbus. And as I was listening to Mr.
Coell, I was thinking that's the kind of
landlord that we all deserve. That's the
kind of landlord that we all deserve.
Um, just want to thank you. You know,
I'm big on process. Process matters. I
talk about it all the time. Being
inclusive. Make sure you're listening to
the folks who will support these things,
but also the folks who will disagree
with it. That we know what and and
deeply understand um where they will be
coming from in their disagreement. And
you led a very thorough process. I
believe um one that truthfully and what
is pretty cool about this piece of
legislation, this actually wraps up our
housing for all package that council
member Shayla Favor, our prosecutor
Shayla Faver started three years ago. Um
this is the very last piece that that
was announced and it was thoughtful. It
was thor it was this was hard because we
were we I think and I I've heard you say
this we see landlords essentially
especially the smaller ones as small
business owners and so we're not trying
to penalize more especially with the
rising cost of tax uh of property taxes
to to penalize but we are prioritizing
accountability
and I think that uh you've done a good
job of weaving those things together. So
just thank you for your leadership. Um
this is government action. I really do
appreciate um on this night when we do
have so many folks who are first time uh
in council chambers that that you are
seeing even disagreement you're seeing
um how this process um has gotten us
here. So thank you. Thank you to all the
community partners that weighed in those
who are supporting and those who may not
be. One of the things that council
member also I think put into the
legislation was this review period. So
we will have time to to to to
make any adjustments that um folks may
bring to us that we uh might may have
missed. So thank you for your
leadership.
>> Uh thank you uh Cath president and oh
sorry
council member.
>> Yeah. Thank you. Um, I come from a
family of realtors, so I have this
conflicted feeling. And so I concur with
my colleague, um, Council Member Reie,
but I trust in your judgment and your
commitment to the review and for making
things better. And so that is why I'll
vote yes because of my trust in you to
continue to make this um, this registry
better.
>> Well, thank you, council member. Um, and
to council president's point, this does
round out housing for all, but the word
says the last shall be first. So
therefore, I'm I'm gonna take it that
way. Uh, but I do think that, and I also
didn't realize when I raised my hand for
this one, this be the most complex one.
U, but again, we wanted to get to a
place where we were delivering something
that we think that could stand muster,
uh, that could have teeth, uh, and that
would be something that would work for,
uh, Columbus. And I think that is what
we have here today. So again, um, as I
wrap up, I want to, uh, thank everyone
that testified, everyone that's
participated through these three
hearings. Also, again, want to thank our
Department of Building and Zoning
Services as well as our Department of
Development for their partnership and
putting this framework and legislation
together. I also want to thank the team
uh, behind the scenes. I think that we
none of this happens without a great
team. And I think that effective
leadership is not simply about the
credentials or the person that is the
principle, but it's about how you
surround yourself with key folks who are
experts in certain areas. And so again,
I want to thank uh my aid JP Dorval, uh
Jonathan Brown on my team, as well as
Jessica Clinger and our council
president's offices and Katie Fallon on
our legislative research office for all
of the work that they have done uh
behind the scenes to get us here. Um and
I want to thank them, thank them, thank
them. Uh this proposal is not perfect um
and it is certainly not a silver bullet
uh to solve our housing issues but it is
the right thing to do and it is a right
step in the right direction for our
city. Our city is evolving and when I
hear these stories of what is happening
in so many properties that shows us that
as our city continues to grow we have to
check all of our systems and when
they're broken it's not that we continue
to allow that to happen. it is our job
uh to go and try to fix them to meet the
needs of our residents today and I will
continue to do that. Uh so with that uh
I will uh I see no other questions or
comments from my colleagues. I will move
for passage
>> second
>> by voice.
Bankston,
>> yes.
>> Barrosa de Padilla,
>> yes.
>> Deakau,
>> yes.
>> Dorren,
>> yes.
>> Green,
>> yes.
>> Remy,
>> no.
>> Ross,
>> yes.
>> White,
>> yes.
>> President Harden,
>> yes. What is this?
>> Thank you.
and
council president. May I move to the
finance and governance committee?
>> Please.
>> Uh, thank you. First up in finance and
governance, we have ordinance 0634-2026
to authorize the director of department
of finance and management to enter into
a contract for the option to purchase
waste identification disposal and
emergency spill response services with
Buckeye M contracting LLC to weigh the
competitive bidding requirements that
the evaluation committee for the best
value procurement be made up of an an
odd number of people and to authorize
this expenditure.
Uh, this ordinance establishes a
universal term contract with Buckeye M
cont Contracting LLC for the
identification and cleanup and disposal
of hazardous and non-hazardous waste.
Three bids were received and Buckeye M
contracting received the highest score.
Are there any questions or comments from
my colleagues? Seeing none, I move for
passage.
>> Clarosa
de Podia de Aawa Doris Green Reie Ross
Swice President Harden
>> pass. My bad. And finally in the finance
and governance committee we have
ordinance 0983-2026
to uh this ordinance authorizes the
director of the department of technology
to enter into a contract with VAS
computer inc for Oracle software
licenses maintenance and support
services to authorize the expenditure of
1 million48,97265
from the department of technology
information services operating fund and
to declare an emergency. Oracle is the
database engine behind multiple
applications in the city of Columbus
such as Excella, the Columbus utilities
billing system, and the work and asset
management system. Two bids were
received for Oracle software licenses,
maintenance and support services in
March of this year. Vasque Computer,
Inc. was the lowest bidder. To ensure no
service interruption and the
establishment uh and to establish a
purchase order at the earliest possible
date, emergency designation is being
requested. Are there any comments or
questions from my colleagues? Seeing
none, I move for passage.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Bangarosa deodia de a dors green remy
ros vice president Harden
>> pass. Thank you, council president. May
I move to the economic development
committee. Chair, if it's all right, I
think I'm going to uh call for recess.
And just to explain to folks who again
who are not here uh often, uh by code,
we have to uh recess and take the zoning
meeting uh uh at 6:30 p.m. Uh we only
have three ordinance on the um zoning in
the zoning committee. So, we uh
anticipate this being uh very quick and
I think that a lot of folks here are
part of a want to be part of the larger
conversation that we're going to have in
your committee uh coming up. self if you
don't mind. Is there a motion to recess
for zoning?
>> So move.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks Rosa Podia de Aar Dors Green Remy
Ross, Vice President Hard.
>> We are in recess. We will uh start
zoning kind of promptly at 6:30ish.
Daddy.
Hey.
Just about to feel it.
You got to feel it.
Doctorilly
dilly dilly dilly dilly.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Hey. Hey. Hey.
Heat. Heat.
Heat up here.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Order. Clerk, please call the role.
>> Bank Simber Rosa Padilla de AOA Dors
Green Remy Ross Vice President Harden.
>> Can I get a motion with the reading of
the journal?
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Bank Simber Rosa Deodia de Aawa Dorren
Green Remy Ross Vice President Harden.
>> Are there any additions or corrections
to the journal hearing? None. The
journal is approved. We'll now go to the
zoning committee. Council member Dorren
chairs that committee and all members
serve on it. Council member, the floor
is yours.
>> Thank you, President Harden. As always,
before we begin tonight's zoning agenda,
I'll briefly explain a rule speaking
before council on reszoning and
variances. We will only hear a staff
presentation for ordinances that have a
disapproval from a recommending body or
if we have a public speaker to sign up
to speak against an ordinance. We permit
three speakers on each side, three
proponents, three opponents. Uh we ask
those speakers limit the remarks to
three minutes per the standard rules of
city council. All speakers and council
variance, including city staff, area
commission, applicants, and members of
the public will be sworn in before they
give testimony. Representatives and area
commission are always able to speak on
an ordinance and do not need to fill out
a speaker slip. Will you ask uh you
alert city staff of your intention to
speak at this committee hearing? Uh this
evening we do not have any public
speakers signed up to speak on any piece
of legislation this committee. On the
advice to city attorney's office will
now swear in city staff. Please stand
and raise your right hand and be sworn
in. Do you swear affirm the test you're
about to give shall be the truth nothing
but the truth as you shall answer under
pains of penalty of perjury. If so,
please say I do.
Thank you. Please let the record reflect
that Alyssa Saltzman from the Department
of Building and Zing Services has been
sworn in. Uh first, uh we only have
council variances on our agenda here
tonight. And first we have ordinance 0
or I'm sorry 10006-2026
to grant a variance provision section
34E2100A
use table of the Columbus City codes to
the property located at 3616 East Broad
Street to allow for accessory outdoor
storage in the CAC community activity
district. site consists of one parcel
developed with a big box retailer and
the applicant requested accessory
storage uses uh including a trailer in
conjunction with the retail business at
that property. A council variance
required because storage uses are not
allowed in that zoning district.
Additionally, the requested uh variance
will facilitate an updated final site
plan compliance to respond to an active
zoning code violation. U the proposal is
approved from city staff and the M East
area commission. Do my colleagues
questions comments? Seeing none, I first
move to accept the entire staff report
into evidence as an exhibit.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks timber Rosa de Podia de Aawower
Dors Green Remy Ross Vice President
Harden.
>> Accept it.
>> Thank you. Next move to adopt the
finance of staff, the finance of
council.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks Rosa de Padilla de Aawower Dors
Green Remy Ross Vice President Harden.
>> Adopt it.
>> Thank you. Uh I move to amend this as
the clerk.
>> Clerk, please call the role. Banks Rosa
de Padilla de AWA Dors Green Remy Ross
Vice President Harden
>> amended.
>> Thank you. I now move for passage as
amended. Second clerk,
>> please call the role.
>> Bank Simber Rosa de Padilla de Akawa
Dors Green Remy Ross Vice President
Harden.
>> Pass.
>> Thank you. Next we have ordinance
1033-2026
grant variance provision of section
3353.03 permitted uses 33 uh61.02
permitted uses and 3361.03 development
plan and 3361.04
4B performance criteria. The Columbus
City codes are properly located at 7400
74 7400 Huntington Park Drive to allow a
residential treatment facility with
produced development standards in the
CPD commercial plan development
district. Site consists of one parcel
developed an existing residential
treatment facility. The request of
council variance will legitimize that
existing use. A council variance is
required for the impatient aspect of
this type of facility. A proposal has
approvals from city staff and the far
north Columbus communities coalition. Do
my colleagues and question comments.
Seeing none, I move to accept the entire
staff report and new evidence as an
exhibit.
>> Second.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks timber roa de podia de a doris
green reie ros president.
>> Accept it.
>> Thank you. And next move to adopt the
science of staff, the finance of
council. Second.
>> Cler, please call the role.
>> Banks roa de podia de a doris green remy
ros president Harden.
>> Adopt it.
>> Thank you. And finally, move for
passage. Clerk please call the role.
>> Banks Rosa de Padilla Deakau Dorne Green
Remy Ross vice president Harden
>> passed.
>> Thank you. And next we have ordinance
1034-2026
to grant advance provisions of section
333 2.037 R2F residential district
3312.49 C required parking 333.14 R2 F
area district requirements 3332.19
fronting 3332.21 building lines
3332.25AB
required side yards 3332.27 27 rear yard
and 3332.28
obstructions in required sideyard. The
Columbus City Coast for property located
at 358 East Desler Avenue to allow
residential development with reduced
development standards in the R2F
residential district. Site consists of
four parcels lots A, B, C, and D. Lots A
and C are undeveloped. Lot B is
developed with a two-unit dwelling
proposed to be demolished and lot D is
developed with a four-unit dwelling. The
requested council of variance will allow
two uh allow a new two-unit dwelling on
lots A, B, and C, and will conform the
existing four-unit dwelling on lot D. A
council of variance is required because
the current zoning district allows only
one single or or one two-unit dwelling
per lot, but does not allow for a
fourunit dwelling. Development standards
uh variances for for each lot are also
included in this request. Proposal is
approved from city staff and the
Columbus Southside Area Commission. Do
you want to make colleagues any question
or comments? Seeing none, I move to
accept the staff report into evidence as
an exhibit.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks Timber Rosa de Padilla de AOA Dorn
Green, Remy Ross, Swice, President
Harden.
>> Accept it.
>> Thank you. And next move to adopt the
five steps, the finance of council.
Second.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks Timber Rosa de Padilla de AWA Dors
Green. Remy Ross, Vice President Harden.
>> Adopt it.
>> Thank you. And finally move for passage.
Second. Clerk,
>> please call the role.
>> Banks Timber Rosa de Padilla de AOA Dors
Green Reie Ross Vice President Harden.
Passed
>> eight council president all we have
tonight zoning agenda.
>> Thank you Mr. Chair. Is there a motion
to adjourn?
>> Clerk please call the role.
>> Banks Rosa de Padilla de a Doris Green
Remy Ross vice president Harden
>> meeting is adjourned. I'm also going to
do a little bit more house cleaning or
clean up. Uh, now I'm going to get
Heat. Heat.
Heat.
Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat. Heat.
Heat
up
Hey, hey, hey.
Hey,
we are down.
Hey,
hey, hey.
Hey,
hey, hey.
hard. Um, first in the economic
development small minor business
committee, we have ordinance 0636-2026
to amend the 2025 capital improvement
budget to appropriate funds within the
AC Humpco 2 tiff fund, Harrison West
Recreation Park Fund, Wagner Road TIFF
fund, and Wagner Road TIFF capital fund
to transfer funds between the Wagner
Road TIFF fund and Wagner Road TIFF
Capital Fund to transfer funds
respectively within the development
taxable bond fund ACMCO2. to TIFF fund,
Harrison West Recreation Parks Fund,
Wagner Road TIFF Capital Fund, and Rocky
Fork TIFF Capital Fund to authorize the
director of the Department of
Development to enter into a contribution
agreement and restrictive covenant for
the public parking spaces, public
infrastructure improvements, and public
art and placemaking improvements
associated with the greenhouse gravity
project to authorize the expenditure of
$2 million from the development taxable
bond fund, AC Humm TIFF fund, Harrison
West recreation and park fund, Wagner
Road TIFF Capital Fund and Rocky Fork
TIFF Capital Fund to to the Gravity
Project 3 Holdings LLC for the cost of
public parking spaces, public
infrastructure improvements, and public
art and placemaking improvements,
including those incurred prior to the
purchase order pursuant to the four said
contribution agreement with the Gravity
Project 3 Holdings LLC.
Despite the incredibly long title, this
ordinance is quite simple. It is to
appropriate funds for the second of two
capital contributions in support of
phase three of the Gravity development
in Franklin. This third phase of the
Gravity project will provide 50 public
parking spaces, uh, public
infrastructure improvements, public art,
placemaking, and 32 affordable
residential units at or below 80% of the
area median income. This uh the city
approved uh the first of this capital
contribution on November 20th of 2023
and this is the second of those uh
payments uh per the agreement. Are there
any questions or comments from my
colleagues? Seeing none, I move for
passage.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Thanks. Timber Rosa de Padilla Deakau
Doran Green Remy Ross Vice President
Harden
>> passed. And lastly, we have ordinance
1112-2026
to authorize the director of department
of development to enter into a
development agreement with the county of
Franklin, Ohio Confluence Community
Authority and the NWSL Columbus LLC
together with one or more to be
identified affiliates new to finance and
develop certain facilities required by
the National Women's Soccer League
necessary to secure a franchise for
Columbus and to deliver certain
community benefits commit benefits
commitments from new co all in the all
in furtherance of important improvements
to community assets and Columbus'
position as a national leader in women's
sports to authorize the director of
department of development and or
recreation and parks director to enter
into any leases with the confluence
community authority contemplated by the
development agreement for the NWSL teams
training facility to wave the provisions
of chapter 328 of Columbus City Codes to
authorize the director of department of
development to execute a contribution
agreement with the Confluence Community
Authority for the city's capital
contributions towards the training
facility and modifications to the
stadium as contemplated in development
agreement and to authorize the director
of the department of development andor
recreation and parks director to consent
and file such consent with the city
clerk and to add property of the
training facility to the new community
district of the confluence community
authority per Ohio revised code chapter
349. This ordinance uh is yet another
incredibly long title but relates to the
city's attempt to attract a national
women's soccer league team. Uh, as a
recap, the deal is built around a 2% sir
charge on ticketed games and events at
Scott's Miracle Grow Field to raise $25
million for the construction of a
training facility and improvements to
Scott's Miracle Grow Field Stadium. The
city will front the contribution, but it
will be repaid by user fees generated by
stadium activity, including future
women's soccer matches to fund the
expansion. After the debt is repaid, the
city can continue the 2% search charge
in per perpetuity as another revenue
source to fund priorities like human
services, housing, and youth
programming. Uh I know we have several
speakers on this and I do know that uh
led by council president Hardener is an
amendment, but council president, there
are comments before we get to our
speakers.
>> Sure. So, thank you uh Chair Bankston.
Um, and I want to thank the residents
and neighbors, community advocates and
families. Um, I was going to say from
Southwest Columbus, but the truth is,
um, well, I was going to say the entire
city of Columbus. There are some things
that actually break through some
conversations that we have in this
building that pierce into the psyche of
uh, all of our residents. So there I
really cannot I cannot remember a time
uh where another piece of legislation
that we were considering where I would
get stopped at the grocery store as much
as I have on this piece of legislation.
So I understand and appreciate everybody
weighing in. Um as you all know council
was first briefed on the mayor's
national women's soccer league proposal
in February. Essentially the mayor
provided financial and land commitments
to the ownership group that council had
not signed off on. And for the last
month, we've been having a very public
debate about this. A majority of my
colleagues, including myself, opposed
the idea of a $25 million handout to the
ownership. Instead, we renegotiated for
a user fee on tickets at Scott's Miracle
Grow Stadium to fund that commitment. We
made it work for taxpayers, but now we
have to make it work for neighbors. So,
now we're talking about the lease of
McCoy Park to build that site. Many
people in here know that I grew up on
the south side and this actual McCoy
Park is a park that my nephew plays at.
Just last season was playing at McCoy
Park and it's essentially a grassy field
uh right now. And when council members
first learned of this part of the deal,
we were not told that a different plan
from McCoy Park had been promised to the
neighborhood and set aside. I first
learned about that at our April 6
hearing when neighborhood leaders told
us that they were expecting a
groundbreaking on this site. And this is
what really
is crazy. It's not just a park, but
something that designed specifically for
children with differentlyabled
needs and families in an undeserved
underserved part of our city. And it
wasn't just an idea that by November the
city had been provided with technical
plans from a consultant for designs that
they were presented to the community as
a project that was moving forward.
So for months a public park was being
advanced while at the same time it was
being negotiated away and neither
council nor the community was given this
full picture.
That's a breakdown in process that has
resulted in a breakdown in trust. And I
want to be clear, I support bringing
professional women's soccer to the city
of Columbus. I think it is the right
thing to do and I don't want us to miss
out on it. But how you do things matter,
process matters. And honoring
commitments to neighborhoods, especially
underserved neighborhoods, it matters.
And that's why council is stepping in
again now to fix another part of the
deal that we did not create to make it
more responsible and more responsive to
the community. So I want to talk about
what the amendment would do. First, if
we get the team, then the administration
has to form a working group within 15
days and submit a plan to council within
60 days for where else and how we can
build the park that was promised and to
break ground on that same timeline that
the neighbors were expecting.
I have some ideas in mind. and I know my
colleagues do as well, but what we're
not going to do today is announce those
because we're not going to leave the
neighborhood out of this process again.
So, the Southwest Area Commission will
be at the table uh in the working group
to help make that decision. It will
include meaningful public engagement in
that process. So, residents are not in
just informed but actively are shaping
the outcome.
Secondly, I personally negotiated that
the ownership group will donate an
additional $3 million towards this new
park, this new and future park in the
southwest Columbus. This plus other
resources the city had been budgeting
should be enough to fully fund phase one
of the park that was planned.
Third, there will be some public and
community access to portions of the
training complex. recreation and parks
and our community will be able to
utilize some soccer fields and
facilities at the training facility.
And finally, we're going to link real
concrete plans for the park to the
funding for the team. Or other words, if
there are no plans for the park, if
there are no sites uh presented, then
there will be no money.
And this is spelled out in the
legislation. Our goal is to motivate the
administration to move as fast to
deliver for neighbors as they did for
these companies. And I want to be
honest. I'm looking at Miss Liz out
there. This is not the outcome that the
Southwest residents were originally
promised. And we have to be honest about
that.
But I feel a real responsibility now to
make sure that what comes next is done
right and that the community ultimately
receives the kind of park investment
they were led to expect.
Council is working to chart a path
forward in muddy waters. But real
leadership is about clarity,
accountability, and centering community
engagement
because none of this had to happen.
We've done the best that we can in the
past six weeks to fix what the mayor and
his administration should have been
working on for the last six months. The
mayor didn't have to offer up this site
or if he was going to, his team could
have been working since October on an
alternative plan with the neighborhood.
But this the but the first time the
mayor's team engaged the neighborhood
was last Thursday,
four days ago.
That's absurd.
This is what makes people cynical about
public private partnerships about the
Columbus way. Yes, it is good and
necessary for to for the business
community and government to work
together to solve problems to shoot for
the stars. Sure. But it is not
acceptable when the community gets cut
out of the deal. So, I'm proud that this
debate has taken place in public, at
hearings, and at council meetings, not
behind closed doors where only the
wealthy and the well-connected can have
a say. I'm frustrated that the mayor's
negligence put us all of us, council,
the league, the team ownership, and the
neighborhood in this position. And I
will also add
that this process has allowed for
us to be turned against each other.
It really pisses me off because it did
not have to happen this way. It did not
have to happen this way.
But this is the thing. I'm an elected
leader. It is our job to uh it is not
our job to call out problems. Not just
to call out problems, but it is our go
job to fix them. I'm offering these
amendments tonight to try and try to do
that. I believe this New Deal does that
and I will support its passage and so I
look forward to hearing from the
speakers, from my colleagues, from all
those as we are trying to consider this
path forward together. This is not the
original deal. This is not what the
community was promised, but this is what
council what I have brought before
council for consideration to make
to to allow us to still do the big thing
but still honor to the best of our
ability um what was promised to
neighbors. I understand that this is a
moment where no one trusts institutions,
no one trusts government. That's why we
move this process into the public.
That's why this frustration that I'm
sharing, I'm not feigning. This is not a
political stunt. The easiest political
thing for me to do would have been to
vote this thing down. My responsibility
though at the end of the Okay. Well, I'm
talking. My responsibility at the end of
the day is to make sure and to ensure
that the people of the southwest side of
Columbus have a park that is funded and
that folks who are going to advance this
will also pay for it. That is what this
amendment does. Mr. Chair, I'll turn it
back over to you.
>> Uh thank you, uh President Harden. Um we
like as you said, we have several
speakers on this and so we do want to
have more dialogue, I'm sure, to come.
Um it is council's rules that we take
the first three speakers uh both for or
against uh ordinance. I do want to we
take those in order. They came in. So
there I do want to acknowledge that
there were more speakers that signed up
than three and we will make sure that we
acknowledge them. Uh, first up uh to
speak is Miss Liz Reed, followed by DJ
Burns, and then followed by Kelsey Gray.
Chair Reed, welcome back to council. Uh,
you have three minutes.
Good evening, President Harden and
esteemed members of council.
I'm Liz Reed. I'm the voice of the
Southwest Area Commission to Save McCoy
Park.
Today, you are faced with a decision.
Voting yes gives away a public park to
billionaires. Voting no saves McCoy
Park. Your no vote supports families.
Families just like I'm sorry, families
just like Amanda and Iris.
>> ISIS.
>> ISIS. Thank you.
I just met them this evening.
The administration put you in this tough
place. They did not communicate with
anyone other than the owners group.
They before making this deal. They also
did not speak with the National Women's
Soccer League who announced in January
of 2025 they see no reason not to expand
to 30 teams.
The mayor's team was reckless.
This is not our last shot at a team.
Now that the mayor's now the mayor's
office is asking you to hastily sign off
on a bad deal.
They are exploiting your passion for
women's sport and your hope to grow
Columbus to support a package that is
harmful.
You have the power to stop this now.
Despite this amendment, the money
offered by the owners group won't cover
a fraction of the cost to purchase land,
and the money is not due until 2029.
No amendment can materialize land in the
right location for the park.
Ask designers. It is impossible to take
a city plan from McCoy Park and just
plop it somewhere else.
Even if this fast even if this is
fasttracked, the children who now have a
park who now have a park with promised
improvements will be adults before the
park is replaced.
The amendments
changes nothing. You can't vote. You
cannot fix broken legs with a bandage.
Vote yes means you take away from
children with disabilities and families
who are disenfranchised.
You take away an inclusive back
playground. You rob children of a splash
pad. There will be no exclusive pickle
ball or basketball courts. No community
buildings. No walking or rolling paths.
No shel shelters, no picnic tables. If
you vote yes, you support the mayor's
dealings to steal from the very people
you are here to protect. But you
you have the power to save this park.
Vote no.
Stand up for your most vulnerable
residents.
We'll get another chance at a team.
We can do it right next time.
>> The decision calls upon you to get past
the politics of this deal, to see the
real impact on our community.
With your no vote, you have the
opportunity to show Columbus who you
are, what you stand for, and to restore
public trust.
Vote no on ordinance 1112-2026.
Vote no. Save McCoy Park.
>> Can I ask a question?
>> Can I ask a question?
>> Chair Reed. Chair Reed. I think there's
a question for you. Chair Chair Reed, I
have a question.
I if the amendment is approved and the
process moves forward as it is laid out,
do you feel it is reasonable uh to have
the in code in the ordinance
uh uh that that mandates that this
working group has the resources and gets
to uh facilitate all of those things
that you just said it won't have? Do you
think that that is a is that is that the
appropriate place to have that
conversation? And does that give you any
solace that we have we are legislating
that that has to happen with a specific
timeline including keeping the
groundbreaking date that you were
promised?
>> So I looked at the legislation. So all
the timelines don't even start until all
this is negotiated all the way through
from my reading or my understanding of
the amendment. How long will that take?
So we're talking months, weeks before
that's done and then the 60 days start.
So then you start the 60 days and then
you start identifying and then you need
land or property or wherever that's
going to be. Then you need some public
comment or conversation about that. Then
if it's something you need to purchase,
then you need to legislate that. That
takes time. Um it takes time to bring
things to council. It takes time to have
public comment. You can't just purchase
things. Um when you work for a city
because of the auditor office, make sure
that we have due diligence in all of our
pro processes. Um so it takes time to do
all that. So then once you get all of
that done, then what you're talking
about next is a design plan. That design
plan took a year in the making.
But we already had some additional
things coming into that. We own the
land. There was a lot of things. It
takes time. You can't just take all that
work that was done and just plop it
somebody where else. I've I've talked to
designers on this. It just can't happen.
That work will need to be redone. it'll
be need to be redone for whichever
property or land that is located to make
that happen. That will take more time.
So then after that then you've got to
work you got to get the legislation to
make sure that you can start paying for
the work to get done. Um, so it just the
funding then also is not aligned with
when the purchases might need to take
place because we're not getting the the
money um through this agreement
>> paid in full until
>> not paid in full until 2029. And I I'm
not a developer. I don't know how much
it costs for land, but I can't imagine
know knowing that just a small little
house sometimes can cost $3 million. I
can't imagine what property when you're
talking about 30 acres might cost. I
mean, not my house, trust me. Um, but um
it it it cost money to do that. Um and
that upfront money, I don't you know,
are we taking from what we had already
planned in terms of the money in ter
start digging that was supposed to
happen this year to make that happen.
Where's that coming from? You had the
tightest budget from my understanding
you had one of the tightest budget years
this year. And I just as much as we want
to legislate this to fix it, I just
don't think we can.
>> No, that's fair. I want to start you the
right first thing you brought up was a a
a good point. We have in the amendment
that we would pull this working group
together 15 days after we win the team.
The reason we said that was if we don't
get the team, you know, then but but to
but to your point though, I think that
the the community deserves a table
regardless if we get this team or not.
Uh because uh trust was broken and trust
has to be rebuilt around a table. Um I I
won't ask for that to be an amendment in
this piece of legislation, but I I am
looking at Director Ree and I have a
line of questions for Director Ree.
Regardless, it is council's expectation
that in 15 days we start pulling
together all of these partners. Anyways,
uh regardless, secondly, you made a
point that was a really good point. Uh
you are a former city employee. You know
the speed of government, but as I said
in my statement, we saw the speed of
public private partnerships. This thing
didn't exist six months ago. And if six
months the public and private sector
could come up and put together a whole
site plan and do all of this stuff
in this legislation, I'm holding the
government and our private partners
accountable that they too should move at
the same pace that they did for these
companies. And so I I I I 100% uh
understand and see I'm just um trying to
do my best to be honest, to be open and
transparent about a process and hold
folks accountable because
the proc what was given to you was a
broken promise from the administration.
Now this would be our promise. This
would be council's promise. And I'd be
damned if I let that down. We you Okay,
I I'll stop.
>> So, I just want to
So, the reason So, McCoy Park has been a
sticking point. Um the owners group does
not want to give it up. There's a reason
the and I can't speak for them, but
there's at least one reason that I'm
aware of that they would not want to
give it up. It's because it's already
there. It's already purchased. The city
owns it. It's easy to just It's, you
know, a flat piece of land where you can
just make it happen.
So to try to the reason they don't want
to give it up is because it takes more
work to try to find another piece of
land that can do that same thing that
has those same that same functionality.
It takes time to then purchase it. It
takes time to then once you purchase it
start doing the surveying, start doing
all the other work that needs to go into
a plan. Um so they want us to delay as
opposed to the team to delay. So in in
doing that they are taking away a city
park and it will take us longer than it
will than it took them to make this
happen because we don't have identified
land that will make this work.
>> Thank you.
>> I'm not chair.
>> Yes.
>> Joe Matil, please.
>> Council member Green.
>> Thank you, Chair Bangston. And um thank
you, Chair Reid. Um, I just wanted to
get a sense of based on your knowledge
of, you know, kind of the community in
the surrounding area. Um, so not only is
it going to take time, uh, to acquire
new land to build the park that was
promised, but this current parcel is
already being used continuously. I've
talked to many people who have sports
teams that play there. Um so for the
next two years while if this plan were
to move forward in its current form um
while they the park is closed off to the
public and they're constructing this
training facility and we are also in the
process of trying to find a new park to
replace it and then build the rec center
and all the things that were agreed to
over this next two years when that
parcel is off the table while all of
that is in process. Where will the kids
in your community go for recreation?
>> They don't have a place.
>> That's that's the problem. Um this is
one of the most
um disadvantaged areas in the city of
Columbus. So much so that they have the
lowest life expectancy in the state.
um they don't grow, they don't become
seniors, you know, they don't become as
old as I do on average.
>> Yeah.
>> Um
so to take this parcel and not consider
other places and take just a little bit
more time to find the right spot for
this team so we can make a proposal that
we can all come around and support
because we love women's soccer. We love
soccer and we love women's sports and
you combine those together. Columbus
supports that. And I just who should be
waiting for the right piece of land?
Who gets disadvantaged? And in the
meantime, if it is given away, you have
disadvantaged people who have no park.
They can't walk their dog. They can't
they'll have no place to do those
things. And that's not just for the
time. If we can't find another piece of
land somewhere close by, then they don't
have a place ever for that. It's not
just temporary.
>> Um I mean another example of that is
what happened with the ex with the um
the historical crew stadium. So there
was a lot of promises made by the city
saying that
we would find something near, you know,
we try to redevelop this and when that
couldn't happen, they worked on
different things trying to find
something that would work. Well, the
Kilborn Sports
Kilborn Run Sports Center is an amazing
complex. Like it's amazing, but it's a
17inute drive from the neighborhood that
was impacted by that decision.
>> And that's what I'm afraid will happen
here, that the land just won't show up
and it won't happen and we can't make it
happen. And then as time goes on, we
forget how important this is. So, what
I'm So, what I'm hearing you say is that
not only is this an issue of us walking
away from this beautiful complex that
was planned to be built in your
neighborhood in phases, so you would
still have access to the to the
amenities of the park right now. Yes.
>> But also, with the loss of this park,
there is no alternative to serve the
community until a new site is found.
>> Correct.
>> Thank you.
Um, thank you. And I know that there
will be um more
I know that there will be uh more
questions. Uh, Miss Reed, so stick
around just in case folks have
questions. I do have one. I'm going to
probably toss Director Reese uh really
quickly or maybe even you chair can
speak to this. You know, the current
park as it sits is really more utilized,
I think, for sporting activities, little
league football and soccer. From my
understanding, the park that was to be
developed, all of those fields go away.
So, do we have a phasing plan of where
those teams go to play, I'm not sure how
they play, but the the the park design
itself shrinks the number of fields. So,
do we account for where that volume of
people go is what my question is.
>> So, Chair Bankston, um, currently the
teams that play at McCoy, a lot of them
are bust in. Um they're busted in from
different community centers. Um our
staff drive those buses,
they participate, they go home.
>> Okay.
>> Um we had already planned to do games at
Kilbornne.
This is prior to any knowledge of
anything. We had already planned to move
those games over to Kilborn.
>> Okay. Thank you for that clarity. I just
wanted to make sure.
>> Um, thank you. Thank Thank you, Miss
Reed. Again, I'm sure you'll stick
around. So, if there's questions, we'll
call you back up if folks have
>> M Reed.
>> Um, DJ Burns is next, followed by Kelsey
Gray.
My name is DJ Burns. I run the Brewster.
The wages for my past sins are having to
spend time fraternizing with the worst
people alive at our Republican
jerrymandered state house. It's
debilitating to my mentals to watch
gangs of surirly rule grandfathers
storm into rooms and stomp on our most
vulnerable citizens while they reward
the corporate interests and ultra
wealthy donors that control them. But,
you know,
I just realized in this entire deal, at
least when they're pissing on my face,
they're not throwing around words like
equity and opportunity because we expect
this from the Republican party. And
hell, I expect this from our beautiful
mayor,
but we should never expect it nor accept
it from so-called progressive leaders of
the Democratic Party.
the NWSL
to Columbus plan, even with this new
amendment, it's not good enough. And I
applaud you guys for shaking some
pennies out of a billionaire crook like
Jimmy Hasslam. But it falls short when I
look up to the suburban wasteland of
Brook Park who's shaking them down for
25 million to cover the infrastructure
costs of their cyber truck of a stadium
that they're building in their city. And
this is the mighty Columbus. and we're
going home with $3 million.
It's not good enough. And this idea that
it's got to move quickly is another lie
being told. There is no deadline. These
people want 30 teams in their league.
Are we going to do this right or are we
going to snap our fingers for the the
almighty
public private partnership and guys like
Jimmy Hasslam and the and the Vake
Ramosami who they're holding a
fundraiser for literally 72 hours from
now. a stones throw over your river.
This city will never reach its potential
until we beat the huta at the state
level. I'm up there every day. And this
city is never going to beat that huta if
we continue to do things the Columbus
way. If we continue to hand out to these
corporations to snap our fingers for a
nationwide and these CEO crooks who are
unaccountable because last I checked we
elected you guys to shepherd economic
prosperity. We elected you guys to act
as checks on this corporate greed that
is now going to screw over disabled
people.
So don't piss on my face and call it
opportunity. I get enough of that at the
state house. And if we're going to ever
change, if we're ever going to like be
the city that we want to be, then have
some decency. I believe in the decency
of all you people. I'm not comparing you
to Republicans, although you're acting
like them. I believe in the decency of
you people. But if this is the way we're
going to go,
if this is the path we're going to go
down,
then maybe, just maybe, I go out, I get
a thousand signatures, and I throw my
hat into the ring for the mayoral race
and show you guys what an honest to God
campaign for the people and the streets
looks like. Thank you.
>> Thank you. Um,
Mr. Burns. Next is uh Kelsey Gray.
>> Welcome back to council. Uh you have
three minutes.
>> Thank you.
>> I'm a teacher in Columbus City Schools
and I live in District 7. And last week,
my students used this piece of
legislation as a case study. They used
public record to analyze both sides of
the argument. 61 of them engaged civily
with you by writing you letters. I'm
here to read nine of them and I made you
copies for each and every member of your
own to take home and read on your own
time.
I'm going to read the first one in total
and then a bridge the rest. Dear Council
Member Shannon Harden, my name is
Manasse and I'm a 16-year-old boy and I
attend Independence High School. I am
writing to you to let you know that I
think that the people of Franklin
deserve that park they got promised. The
people of Franklin are already
struggling due to the highways and
pollution also not having a lot of green
areas. So, this park could really help
the people. There is no way that the
people of Franklin should have an
18-year life expectancy less than the
rest of the city. And also, there is no
reason to be giving money to the ones
that have an abundant amount as it is. I
hope you read this letter and take it
into consideration. I hope you have a
great rest of your day. He wrote to you
because you are his representative.
Dear Columbus City Council, my name is
Osara and I'm a senior in high school. I
think you should keep your word and
build this park. I grew up in a small
town called Pokeypsy, New York. When we
were on summer break, we would stay home
with our while our parents would work.
The time my mom would come home after
work, she would take us to one of the
few parks we had. When I tell you guys
it was probably the best time of my
life, we would run and play at the
playground. That's all kids want. Kids
need a park near home. This will leave a
mark in a kid's life and they'll have in
their memories for the rest of their
lives. I'm sure a woman's soccer
facility can be built anytime, but a
kid's memory cannot be replaced.
Dear Columbus City Council, my name is
Terrell and I go to Independence High
School. I feel like y'all should build
the park. You already promised it to the
people. That should be the end of the
story. The park will bring the kids
together and give them something to do.
In Delaware, Ohio, there's a park called
MIGO. I will move there just for the
park. Reason is it would keep me out of
trouble or from just doing dumb kid
things. Dear Columbus City School,
sorry, dear Columbus City Council, I'm
against giving billionaires money to
build something. Giving them more money
is like pouring water into the ocean.
Dear Columbus City Council, my name is
Alisonan and I want to start off by
saying please don't be dumb. You guys
are adults and now have the chance to do
big things for our community. So while
you do it, please make adult choices. I
play soccer for Sporting Columbus and I
enjoy the sport. What I do not enjoy is
you using the money that we worked hard
for on a women's soccer facility. Maybe
be smart and spend the money on
something that can help this terrible
school system. Spend the money on the
people that make the money. Dear
Columbus City Council, my name is
Stormmy. I'm a student at Independence
High School. I don't think, but I know
that giving 50 million to billionaires
to build a facility that will have
little to no benefit to our community is
absurd. The money that is supposed to be
used to uplift our community is being
used in the wrong way. I only have two
more. Can I read them briefly? Thank
you. Dear council member, my name is
David. I go to Independence High School.
I would like for you to vote against
Columbus City Columbus City building the
stadium. The location already doesn't
have enough greenery. To take the last
bit would be cruel to the community.
Columbus City has already promised the
community a better park with more
greenery and activities. They should
keep their promise. Lying not only ruins
the city's trust and reliability, but it
just sets a reputation in general.
Dear Columbus City Council, my name is
David and I vote for the city council to
keep their word and build the new park
for the neighborhood because the
Hasslams already have enough money. Why
give more money to a billionaire when
there's homeless people out there
struggling without shelter? Another
reason is when food stamps were shut
down last year, many people were mad and
they still are actually because they
were expecting to get the food stamps
and they still haven't got them. No one
gets food stamps and my mom doesn't get
them either and she's just out there
struggling. So, you could use that money
to give food stamps to people who need
it.
Thank you.
Thank you. Um,
Mr.
I also wanted to again say that we had
um our rule is that we had three
speakers against something three
speakers for, but we did have more
speakers to sign up. So I do want to
acknowledge that Jennifer Kraton and
also Joe Motiel signed up
>> uh to speak again. Thank you again um
>> Miss Gray. Now we will hear from uh
speakers uh who are proponents. Uh first
up is and I apologize if I get this
wrong. Gaya Castati or Cassat
you go.
Thank you. Welcome to council. come on
up to the podium.
Please correct my pronunciation and you
have three minutes.
>> Good evening.
>> Good evening.
>> First, I want to say thank you to city
council president Harden and city
council members for the opportunity to
speak to you all today. My name is Gaia
Casati,
very close. I grew up right here in
Columbus, Ohio, uh, north side Columbus,
and I currently live in King Lincoln. My
family and I immigrated here a very long
time ago, and we chose to lay our roots
here in Columbus to find our sense of
belonging here in Columbus. And I
believe one of the best ways we were
able to do that was through sports. My
siblings and I played sports in school
for the rec centers in our neighborhoods
with our friends and strangers who would
become our friends.
It was never about the game for me. It
gave me a lot more than that. It was an
opportunity for a young girl who felt
like a fish out of water, to feel
confident, to learn to communicate with
others, to
learn discipline, and honestly to stay
out of trouble.
In fact, I continue to play sports on an
adult wreck team, not professional at
all, for all the same reasons today.
You might have seen my young daughter
with me earlier, Maya. And if you didn't
see her, you definitely heard her.
As a mother now raising a daughter in
the same city, I start to truly truly
value and think about the environment
that she's growing up in.
I want her to see what's possible for
her. I want her to look up to
entrepreneurs like her mom. I'm an
attorney and I'm a law firm owner.
I want her to have women in law to look
up to, women in tech and women in
leadership positions. And I believe that
Columbus does a wonderful job of that
already. I can speak from experience
because I have some of the best mentors
right here in Columbus.
But I want her to have something else
that I did not have, which is women in
sports. And let me clarify,
it's women competing at the highest
level possible right here in her own
city. I would love for her to find that
in Columbus versus having the need to
travel elsewhere to find that kind of
inspiration and representation.
I want her to be able to dream big and
then I want her to dream even bigger
than that.
Bringing a National Women's Soccer
League team to Columbus again is never
about just sports.
It's about representation,
about community, and about giving young
girls and young boys something powerful
to believe in. Look, Columbus has
already proven that we're a city that
show shows up. We show up in support of
our teams. We invest in our future. We
lead in innovation. I mean, even
artificial intelligence. We're not
afraid to compete against powerhouses in
Silicon Valley.
So I ask, why not lead in this too?
Why not be the city that sets the
standard for all sports, including
women's sports?
I'm an attorney. I believe in justice as
well, and I believe that this amendment
is a sufficient way to achieve justice
in light of the circumstances.
I'm also a mother of a daughter in this
city, and I believe in a better future.
I support this initiative and I urge you
all to do the same. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
>> Any questions?
Thank you for your testimony.
Um, next we will have Mark Wise followed
by Doug Wolf.
President Harden and members of council.
My name is Mark Wise and I am the owner
of the Columbus Eagles FC. We are
currently the highest level soccer
women's soccer in Columbus. Um maybe a
very well-kept secret, but that's just
because we're small. Um, I had some
things prepared, but I'm going to change
that a little bit tonight because I want
to tell you just real quickly. Um,
you're looking at a guy that has been a
woman's a advocate for I don't know 30
years. I had two daughters that I I I
raised and they ended up being athletes.
And for a guy my age, I remember growing
up in a time when women didn't play
sports without getting made fun of. So
somewhere along the way I I fell in love
with women's sports through my daughters
and my youngest daughter asked me to be
a soccer coach and from that it turned
into 30 years of being a a women's
soccer coach uh 19 years of a high
school soccer coach and a real love for
the women's national team. And when they
were in the uh World Cup in 1999, I
experienced
70,000 people watching women play
soccer. And it was crazy. It was crazy
for me. But I look forward to having
professional women's soccer in Columbus
so I could come watch. And the first
goound they had, they didn't even think
about Columbus. Three years later, they
failed. Three years after that, they
came with a second league. And I said,
'Of course they'll come to Columbus.
Columbus is where it's it's at. You you
don't you have to know how many women
are playing soccer in Columbus. How many
girls are playing soccer in Columbus?
How how many uh uh ladies that we send
to division one, division 2, division
three schools from Columbus. And I said,
I need to be able to watch it in
Columbus. Second time they said no.
Third time NWSL came around and I said
certainly they'll come into Columbus.
That time didn't happen. went to my went
to my uh uh coach's uh clinic at some
point. I was complaining. They said,
"Mark, you need to do something." I
said, "I don't have the money to do
something." But in 2013, I put down
$6,000 to start the Columbus Eagles. The
objective was to help de uh develop
women's soccer in Columbus so that we
could have at some point a professional
uh club in in town. There's just so many
benefits and I I don't have the time to
list them all. So many benefits for
these young ladies who used to go to the
the crew uh clinics and see all the boys
saying, "Hey, I could be a professional
one day." And the little girl said,
"Well, what's in it for me?" And there
wasn't anything. And I wanted to help
make that happen. Now, it isn't my it
isn't me. I wasn't able to make it
happen. But we do have some people are
willing to make that happen today. and I
fully support what they're trying to do
because it's going to benefit women and
that's what I've been about. Thank you
for your time tonight.
>> Thank you. Um thank you Mr. Wise for
your testimony. Thank you.
>> Uh uh last speaker is Doug Wolf.
Doug, welcome to council and you have
three minutes.
Thank you, uh, Council President Harden.
Uh, members of council, thank you for
the opportunity to speak this evening.
I'm Doug Wolf, president and CEO of
Adaptive Sports Connection. First, thank
you for your continued investment in
Adaptive Sports and in people with
disabilities across our great city. At
Adaptive Sports Connections, we work
every day with individuals with
disabilities and their families to
provide access to recreation and sport.
For many of the families we serve, that
does not happen automatically. It
happens because someone chooses to
create opportunity. Invest in inclusion
and build the support and community that
make participation possible.
At ASC, I work alongside Q Hannes. Q is
a 2023 USA Ampute Soccer World Cup
silver medalist. I've seen what it takes
to overcome barriers and excel in
adaptive sport. I've seen a father
discover he could play alongside his son
with autism through adaptive recreation.
I've seen a 95-year-old veteran with
vision impairment smile like a child
skiing for the first time. Those moments
stay with you because they show you what
becomes possible when access is real.
And this is why I'm here tonight. I
believe bringing a National Women's
Soccer League team to Columbus and the
proposed development at McCoy Park can
expand access and opportunity for people
with disabilities. We have already seen
what this can look like through the
Columbus crew. We have seen real
investment in access for people with
disabilities and others who've been too
often left out. Thanks to investments
made by the crew, Columbus is home to
GOAT, the greater Ohio ampute soccer
team. Blind soccer and gold ball
programming have expanded and direct
investments have also been made to
organizations like adaptive sports
connection that provide adaptive
recreational opportunities beyond
soccer, supporting well-rounded
opportunities for adaptive sport and
recreation in the city of Columbus. In
my previous role at Boys and Girls Club
of Central Ohio, I saw the same kind of
investment open doors for young people
who may not have otherwise had access to
these kinds of experiences.
So when I think about what an NWSL team
could mean for Columbus, I think more
about access, more opportunity, more
moments of belonging, and more people in
this community.
I also want to acknowledge the concerns
that have been raised. The potential
loss of public land matters. The promise
of inclusive space matters. Access in
this community should not be diminished.
From my perspective, this is the
standard. This project should expand
access, not reduce it. And I believe it
can. And from our standpoint at Adapted
Sports Connection, we are ready to
partner in that work because we've
already seen what happens when
investment moves beyond good intentions
into real action. I believe Columbus can
get this right. Thank you.
>> Thank you, D.
Um and and again just wanted to
acknowledge that there were other
speakers. Again, we only take three,
four and three against, but want to just
acknowledge that Lori uh Walker and
Vanessa Savage also signed up to speak
in favor. I'm going to move into some uh
questioning. I know that there's
probably be other questions from my
colleagues. Uh I I just want to start
off with uh Director Stevens. Uh,
director, I think one of the big things
we have heard and I think continue to
heard is this idea of the urgency of the
bid and uh that council can reject this
deal uh and submit a new bid
at a future site. Can you just speak to
the knowledge that you have of kind of
the timeline
why this expansion opportunity is the
most advantageous and critical?
>> Yep. Thank you, uh, President Harden,
Chair Banks, and members of council.
It's really important to remember that
the ownership group is putting together
a bid to get an expansion NWSL franchise
to make that bid as attractive as
possible to the league. We've engaged
with the ownership group to show that
public private partnership component of
it.
We know when we the mayor first met with
the commissioner of the NWSL
they were considering two expansion
league teams in the league. They have
announced one in Atlanta. So we know at
the current time they are considering
another expansion team for the immediate
future and they're that's the bid that
was put together and that's this deal is
a component of that bid to show the um
support around the community to attract
this team. So, we know time is of the
essence because the league is looking to
add a second team that will start in the
2028 season. So, they need to get to a
decision point in the near future. So,
whoever whatever community is awarded a
team can start the process to put a team
in place to meet the timeline of a 2028
season.
>> Uh, thank you for that, director. And I
think you said there that the mayor did
have a conversation with the
commissioner to NWSL. Uh but also want
to clarify, you know, we the city is not
looking to buy the team, right? This is
about a package uh that we have put
forth to uh the NWS sale for the bid. Is
that the best way to frame this? And I
also want to say this too. I think I I
believe that we're in a good position,
but we don't know yet if in fact we
would win the team. So, Chair Bankston,
the franchise is being pursued by a
private ownership group. There's a 300
plus million dollar capital investment
required to secure a expansion
franchise. The city's component of this
is a um investment, shared investment in
the training facility as part of the
public private partnership. So really um
we're we're a component of the overall
deal that is being pursued by the
ownership group and working with the um
the league.
>> Thank you for that. And then just one
question for um uh director Ree and then
I want to of course open up to my
colleagues. uh director I think around
this idea and what makes this difficult
for even me uh and I think I've been
supported from the very beginning uh was
the this revelation about McCoy Park and
what it was to be used for right
adaptive uh uses can you talk about how
is this this is expanding right adaptive
use facilities that we have we have
other adaptive use facilities around the
city and um we're committed to that
could you just talk to where those
facilities exist, what that commitment
looks like uh as a city.
>> Chair Bangston, um our therapeutic
program when we talk about adaptive
sports, um we actually have the SB
adaptive sports complex. Um last week we
just held a regional uh botchi
tournament. And so uh that's one
facility. During our summer we hold a
therapeutic camp at three locations. Um,
and so when you talk about what would
take place uh at McCoy Park, uh, it
would have been just a number of fields,
soccer fields, um, not just soccer
fields, but basketball, pickle ball. Um,
but I want to just say one thing and
that is our core priority in our
department has always been to serve the
community. Um, we have not stopped doing
that and will not stop. It's our
priority to make sure that the Southwest
community has a park. We are in talks
working with people. We are out looking
at properties. Um, our team was out this
weekend looking at things and there are
park or I would say land in the area
that we possibly could look at and that
does not exclude McCoy but it gives us
an opportunity to say that yes we will
keep our promise to that community. Um,
that is really really important to us.
Uh, we held community meetings to make
sure that that planning was put
together. I hear you, President Harden,
when you say joining a group with the
planning of the community, that is
something we can do. It's something we
did do and it's something that we will
continue to do. And so I don't want
council to think that this is something
that we will sit on. We will move
swiftly. we will move rapidly to ensure
that that community has a park
>> and director to that point I think I
heard you just say identifying sites and
I know that's underway uh but more
importantly I think some of those
amenities specific to uh adaptive use
>> is that where we're still all do you
believe that there's sites that would
accommodate those things in particular I
think
what I heard even I think from last week
from some of my colleagues that it's not
just simply about the sports piece of
it. It's the other components right at
the playground and splash pad and these
other amenities
um that would accommodate uh that
community. Uh is that something that is
feasible with you know just a bird's eye
view of what we have found uh on that
side of town?
>> I do believe so. Um, we have something
we're looking at that uh the acreage it
would fit within that plan. Um, yes, Liz
Reed is right. Um, would we have go to
go back to design? Yes. Um, does that
take long? We're already starting this
process. So, we're not just sitting
around. We're trying to move as rapidly
as we can. Um, and so, but we also want
to make sure that the community is
involved. And one thing that we said is
until the team has been formed um we
have to wait because we want the
feedback of the community.
>> Yeah.
>> Uh thank you for that. Uh any my
>> just keep that line of questioning going
>> Joe Matil.
>> Okay. Well then sign up and say
something right now I'm speaking and
trying to get a park for the folks of
the southwest Columbus. I
>> director Ree.
>> Yes.
>> So, we council um we've been hearing
conflicting information about the park
that council members were first briefed
on this deal in February. We were told
that there was never ending funding for
the concept, but then the dispatch
reported on a very detailed uh design
plan that was produced in November.
a month after this uh was offered to the
NWSL site and then neighborhood informed
us that they were expecting a
groundbreaking in 2026. My question is
what is true here? What was the timeline
for how much funding is available to
build the therapeutic recreation park at
McCoy? And and where I'm going with
this, I think it is building off of uh
Council Bankson's line of questioning,
trying to understand what is actually
available, what we can afford, and what
this additional $3 million can do to
help move this process along in an
expedited way.
>> Um, President Harden, when we started
design, we did start design, but we also
stopped the design. Once we found out
there was uh a plan going for McCoy, we
stopped the design. So there are there
is a balance of about $450,000
left. Um when you talk about the budget
for construction
um that budget for construction is in
our regular annual um CIP budget which
would be 6 million. Um, with that six
million, we were about 2 million short.
And so, we were trying to look at where
do we get those two millions from to
complete the project. Um, and that would
come this year, that 6 million.
>> So, so we heard from Miss Liz or Chair
Reed um, regarding the 15 days after us
getting the team and the 60 days for us
to have a plan.
I I I think I mean I think I had that
conversation with with chair Reed
before. Um the push back I would have to
we had to wait till we get the team is
>> no
>> we're we're already working from behind
now.
>> Can you tell me with full faith how you
would move this thing forward in an
expedited manner? I am making a promise.
Matter of fact, we are legislating
specifically timelines that are more
aggressive than anything that we have
have have moved uh before. How will you
make that happen? If I vote for this,
>> President Harden, um the the good thing
about it is the specifications for um
the courts, the fields, that doesn't
change. And so it does mean that um when
we're looking at land, what what we find
um to find something that uh is clear as
possible that we could go in rapidly. Um
it has to be legislated before our
commission before it comes to council.
Um we're already speaking about what
does that look like even in May. um can
it can it be done to our commission
because it has to go to our commission
first. Um so we're already starting to
look at the possibilities of how do we
move how do we make things still take
place this year as far as a
groundbreaking.
>> Thank you.
>> Yeah. And just I want to put a final
point on that um director and that's
where I'm but you said the
specifications
of the splash pad and the courts and
what have you. That's the specifications
to build that for adaptive use, right?
The site plan that we've picked that may
change, but the specifications of what
was designed for that use, those are
done and that's what will help this move
with speed. Is that how I'm hearing when
you say specifications?
>> That is correct. And so it's just um a
wider plan. It's wider uh area, playing
area. Um, even the playground would be a
wider playing area that's for wheelchair
accessibility. Um, and ensuring that
it's an inclusive uh, play area for all
individuals.
>> Thank you. Other other members, Council
Member Green,
>> thank you so much, Chair. Um, Director
Ree, can you help me understand? So I I
think you said that
the or or we understand that the design
for the park was released to the
community in November.
Um but you said that you stopped
designing the park when you h as you
said when you learned there was another
plan going on for the park. And so I
guess I'm just trying to understand at
what point exactly did Wreck and Parks
stop doing design for the park? And at
what point maybe
did you um have an idea that there was
another plan going on for the park?
>> So towards the end of the year is when
we stop the and there's several types of
drawings. Um what we haven't completed
is the construction drawing. And so when
we talk about that plan, that's that
construction plan. Um, but it was
towards the end of the year. Don't
recall exactly, but I knew it was
towards the end of year.
>> Okay.
>> Um, and, uh, Director Stevens, question
for you.
um what conversations were happening
internally um you know between maybe
your team and the mayor and director Ree
about if this project were to move
forward
what we would do in response to support
the community when did you guys start
talking about finding a replacement site
or um the need to
move on something like that
>> um thank you council member Green. Uh we
started
fall, I'd say probably early November,
end of October, uh with internal
discussions I know with my colleague
Director Ree on the potential
opportunity in the potential location.
We talked through some of the challenges
around how do we um move forward with
the some of the programming that's
already been identified down there and
how do we solve that and and find other
locations to still deliver on that. Um
it was I I think there was a little of a
chicken and egg conversation on um
how far out in front to get when there
was still a lot of work to be done
whether or not we could even get a deal
where the community um that public
private partnership could come in place
that could be part of the bid. And then
there's still the um final piece of
actually securing or winning or having
the ownership group win the bid for the
franchise. So uh I'd say fourth quarter
of 25 we were having those conversations
and I know in first quarter of 26 um the
development and wreck and park teams
were having conversations on where do we
start thinking and looking to identify
uh additional land for park space.
Thanks,
>> Council Member. Um, Backup.
>> Thank you, Council Member Bangston.
>> I'm sure no one's surprised that I'm
still angry about this.
>> I am angry that we're even considering
that we give public park to
billionaires.
I'm angry that the administration worked
secretly for months on a deal. Heck, I
chair Rick and Parks and I heard nothing
about this.
We should working secretly on a bill on
a deal that gives billionaires what they
want while requiring an underserved
community to make a huge sacrifice and
give up their green space and a new park
that was going to break ground this
year. I'm angry that this deal was
dumped on council in February and we're
the ones trying to fix it. That's
unconscionable. I commend my colleagues
for their efforts to ensure that
taxpayers aren't funding this and the
community eventually gets something out
of it. My vote is not about their
efforts. I'm furious about the
administration's attitude that the
Southwest community shouldn't mind
giving up their new community park that
would also serve the disabled because
the NWSL deal is so great for other
people. Bottom line,
undererved communities should not have
to be the ones making the sacrifice so
billionaires can take a public park.
Instead of giving away a public park and
telling an underserved community to wait
because eventually they'll get something
else, the administration should have
told the billionaires to pay their own
way.
>> I have not waited through this much BS
since I mucked out stalls in a cow barn
as a 4 kid. This is ridiculous.
Uh thank you council member and just
want to uh thank say that it's real and
not only your passion for this but your
passion for recreation and parks in that
department uh and how you lead. Uh I
will say too that again as someone who
was supportive of this and learning
about the park um I too was extremely
frustrated uh and angry by it. But I
definitely I think I went into solution
mode immediately and started looking at
sites and working with our real estate
division. So again, I want to thank uh
this body and my colleagues again for
leaning in on this amendment uh that we
got to today and trying to at least I
think come to a win-win where we can
deliver a park and do both in this
moment. But again, thank you for uh your
continued leadership and advocacy around
recreational parks because it is very
very real. It is very very real. Uh any
other questions of the administration or
folks before we before I potentially
move for passage?
>> I'm just now we we'll have time for
comments beforehand, but
>> I'll give comments, but I just I have a
question. At at what point
was the community going to be notified
about this?
Was there ever was there ever a plan?
So, if it's okay, council member, I'll
I'll start. Um,
in the process in working through this
deal, you our intent was to finalize the
the deal that we worked on with the
ownership group, brief council, and then
take it out to the community. So, the
the timeline of making sure we had a a
deal in place of what we were putting
forward that could be captured in the
ownership group bid and then it's it's
the engagement after the briefing. So,
we started with city council in February
and and moving forward from there.
>> Do you think that's a little backwards?
So, council member, um,
it without having a deal in place,
briefing
council or the community on something
that wasn't didn't didn't exist, wasn't
real at the time. It it was that was the
challenge from from my perspective. So,
you know, that was
>> the park wasn't
>> the the park wasn't concrete, but we
were still dealing with the community.
It sounds like for up to seven years we
were prior to
>> at what point were you going to tell a
community that you were working with for
seven years that this was no longer on
the table and that this park had been
offered up for something else.
>> And like were you allowed to like what?
So normally our process is to sit talk
to the community and find out what is it
that we can do. Um what is it that they
want? What are we looking for? How do we
work together? um when the plan came um
we still don't know and there's nothing
concrete and so that's why this is even
more difficult because when you talk
about McCoy um I hear people saying that
it's it's it's nothing but we don't know
we don't know what is there what we do
know is we're going to work with the
community we're going to work with the
ownership
and there may be something at McCoy It
may not,
but we already have some things in place
to move forward, but it's still meeting
with the community and that's when and
if the team is selected for the city of
Columbus and at that point in time, we
will do community meetings to ensure
that the involvement of the community is
priority.
>> Thank you. Council
member White,
>> sorry, just a quick followup, right?
Because obviously at some point in time
we stopped the planning on this park.
Is it even possible that we were
actually going to hit that timeline for
groundbreaking given that we would have
to do some additional designs from
stopping and starting?
>> Um, we would have hit the groundbreaking
um
>> the construction of the actual park. So
the
>> or the first phase
>> the groundbreaking of the first phase
which was stopped end of year.
>> Yeah.
>> What was in what was involved in the
first phase?
>> So everything outside of the building is
involved in phase one and the building
is phase two.
But again, and
would we have still hit the timeline
that the community assumed we were going
to get if you stopped planning in
November?
>> Correct. We would have.
>> You would have.
>> Yes.
>> Okay. Thank you, director.
>> I have a followup to what Council Member
Ross asked you because
you guys, we talk about notifying the
public. When were you going to notify
us?
you you no one let us know this was an
issue until this community came to us to
tell us that all this work had been done
and promises had been made. So when were
you going to tell us outside of the
public outside of the public bringing it
to us?
Um, Council Member Reie, I appreciate
that question and I will um accept full
responsibility of my inability to
communicate kind of what was in place
and how it was discussed with the
community. That is on me and um it
wasn't intentional, but it was poorly
communicated on my part.
I I guess I guess what I'm so confused
about though is that there seemed to be
a lot of communication with external
stakeholders. I'm I'm truly impressed at
the massive effort to the amount of
emails through this form, the amount of
commercials, the amount of
advertisements that have hap that are
everywhere you go. Like that does not
happen overnight. We know how to
communicate with people. We know how to
get in touch with people. And so I just
don't understand how it is possible or
acceptable or you know how this could
have occurred in this way. Um
I guess that's more of a statement than
a question. I'm not going to make you
respond to it unless you would like to.
I it's it's just it's very um I I think
I I've been thinking so much lately
about what if we mobilized people in the
same way that we did around this soccer
team around ending hunger. Can you
imagine if we had a massive astroturf
campaign? Can you imagine the amount of
movement we could have as a city if we
put that much energy and momentum and
power and money behind a campaign to end
homelessness in our community. It's
impressive the way that we have been
able to contact so many people about
this process and then but the but the
most important stakeholders
just somehow got missed. Um,
>> any further questions? I think I'm going
to to move. I think I'm going to I think
there's something wrong with my
microphone. I'm usually the loudest one.
I think there's something wrong with my
mic. I'm like literally like in the mic.
Um,
uh, again, I'm going to move for the
amendment at this at this point in time
and really, uh, appreciate the, uh, the
dialogue. Yes.
>> I I will move.
>> Yes, I'll do that after the amendment
for the final vote. Um for members u and
again just as a reminder of uh the
amendment and we and how we got here and
again want to thank council president
Harden for introducing this amendment
and getting us here that it does uh a
couple things, right? one, it
establishes uh this timeline uh to form
a working group that includes the
southwest area commission that's in the
legislation to ensure that uh that the
community is involved in that process.
We put timelines that that will be 15
days uh once we are awarded team that
then group is to come back to this body
with 60 within 60 days of a plan of
action of either sites identified or how
we uh proceed forward to deliver on the
specific things that were in McCoy Park.
Additionally, again, thanks to council
president, uh there will be a $3 million
commitment from uh the ownership group
uh to the recreation and parks
foundation to aid in the development of
that park. I want to be clear that that
is for the development of the park. It
is not solely for land acquisition. I
think there's fungeable dollars there to
be able to do that, but it is for the
development of uh the park. Uh I think
that with those amendments in addition
to uh the other changes that I mentioned
at the top of where we got to this deal
of how we even finance it with council,
that is how I was able to get here uh
and be supportive. Uh so with that, I'm
going to first introduce uh the
amendment and ask for a passage by the
amendment by voice. Then we'll ask for
final comments from my colleagues as I
ask for the final vote. Um uh so first
on ordinance uh 111
um excuse me 1112-2026
I first move to amend as submitted to
the clerk by voice
>> second
>> clerk please call the role by voice
>> bankston
>> yes
>> barosa de padilla
>> so chair I know that you asked for
comments in the second one but because
this is a little different I was
>> didn't comment at all
>> my statement about why
>> about your obstaining
>> yeah okay sorry
>> so For more than three decades, I have
had the honor of working at Cityier, a
national nonprofit organization focused
on improving the lives of children
through education. For nearly a decade,
I led the Columbus site and now as part
of my most recent responsibilities at
City Air, I helped to fund raise
throughout the around the country.
Cityear is funded through private public
partnerships like most nonprofits and
since the founding of our site uh the
Nationwide Foundation has been a funer
given the organization's long-standing
partnership with Nationwide including a
potential expansion of that partnership
to additional cities and out of
abundance of caution for ethical
reasons. I'm abstaining from voting on
this piece of legislation.
>> I apologize.
>> So I abstain.
Deakau,
>> no.
>> Dorren,
>> no.
>> Green.
>> Green. No.
Remy,
>> yes.
>> Ross,
>> yes.
>> White,
>> district.
>> Harden.
>> Yes. Amen is passed.
>> Uh, thank you. And um before I move for
final
>> before I move for passage, are there any
final remarks from my colleagues before
I move for passage? Uh Council Member uh
Green.
>> Um I want to acknowledge all of the work
that has gone into getting us here. I
know that especially you, Council Member
Bangston, Council President Harden, you
have um worked tirelessly under
impossible time constraints uh to fix
the numerous very real and significant
um challenges with this deal that itself
was developed over a period of I have to
imagine at least 6 months or more. Um
and I see that work and I am so deeply
grateful for it. Um, and I respect it so
much. Um, I also have no doubt that, um,
it seems very apparent to me after the
conversations we've had over the last
few weeks during these hearings that we
all see the flaws in the plan that was
presented to us and that we all
universally
um, knew that they needed to be fixed.
We understand what's at stake right now.
We all want Columbus to grow. We all
want to bring opportunities like this um
to our city. We all want to find a path
uh where we are able to succeed as a
community and also we all want to take
care of our residents. Uh but for me
this decision ultimately comes down
to a few things. It comes down to
community trust. It comes down to
process. It comes down to policy
priorities. And I think most
importantly, it comes down to who bears
the risk when all of those things break
down. And so we learned last Monday that
as early as last October, this public
land was offered to be used as this park
uh in one of our most underresourced
neighborhoods, the site of a long
promise adaptive recreation center for
people with different abilities. a
project that families in this community
have spent a decade advocating for um
and one that this legislative body had
already funded and then a year later
that legislative action was seemingly
vetoed uh without any notice to us. So
if that if this site was offered in
October, then that means that there were
months, literally months, nearly a half
of a year, where this conversation could
have happened with transparently where
alternative sites could have been
explored, where the administration could
have worked collaboratively with both
the community and with council to get
this right the first time. And instead
we are being asked to respond in a
matter of weeks to decisions that we had
no part of that were made over a matter
of a half of a year or more without any
disclosure. Collaboration and attention
to process is something we don't just do
because it's fun. It's something that we
do because when those things are
bypassed, it puts us exactly in the
situation that we find ourselves in
right now. being asked to make
highstakes decisions on an accelerated
time that we didn't even know about or
create without a fair opportunity to
even try and be able to deliver a
solution where everybody wins. And I
think we could have done that here. I
appreciate the efforts to find a path
forward, including the revised financial
plan, which I think is smart policy, um,
including the idea of convening a workg
group and the commitment of private
dollars. But we're asked to be uh we're
asked to vote on this today. And so I
have to make a decision based on what
facts are in front of me. And I cannot
support a deal that asks one of our most
vulnerable neighborhoods, a neighborhood
already facing, as Chair Reed said, the
one the lowest life expectancy in the
entire state of Ohio to give up its only
park as well as a critical investment in
accessible recreation in exchange for
uncertainty. And I also have to speak to
the broader context of where we find
ourselves in right now. I know that the
auditor spoke earlier tonight about how,
you know, we have a great credit rating
and the fiscal um stability of the city,
but we talked about this openly in the
budget process. We are facing real
financial challenges as a city.
Challenges that right now demand our
full attention, our discipline, and our
focus. challenge is that when we passed
our budget two months ago, there was
another commitment to convene a work
group that we would aggressively address
those budget challenges that are
barreling toward us within. And to date,
that work group has never convened. And
instead, we've been working overtime
trying to fix this problem, a problem
that didn't have to exist in the first
place. But here we are nonetheless put
in the absolutely terrible position of
trying to backfill broken promises and
trying to fix a bad deal that we weren't
a part of making. And we talk a lot
about um about public private
partnerships. But this is not what I
think partnership looks like.
This isn't the way that we do things.
This isn't the Columbus way. This
situation wasn't inevitable. It's the
result of decisions that were made
without transparency, collaboration, or
the diligence that a plan like this
requires in order to execute. And what
I've heard over and over again from
neighbors is why are we the ones that
have to wait?
>> So, this is where I'm going to land. For
me, this is about keeping our word, um,
protecting our priorities, and making
sure that the communities who have
waited the longest are not the ones that
are being told to wait their turn again.
Um and so um while I have deep grat
gratitude for all the work that has gone
into this and I understand I suppose how
others could arrive at a different
conclusion which I respect and I
appreciate all of you. Um but for those
those reasons I'm obviously voting no
president.
>> Thank you chair. I I will be brief. Um,
I want to thank you and and both the
council president for working overtime
in the last six weeks. You should not
have been this body should not have been
put in this position. The community
should not have been put in this
position to try to make a bad deal
better. And while we are significantly I
think this legislation reflects I think
the values that both of you have brought
to make this better. Um, you know,
ultimately I think with more time we
could have gotten there, but ultimately
we're asked to vote here. this evening
and um
I cannot support this at this time, but
the reason we are here is not because of
the lack of you two trying to make this
deal as best as you possibly can. And I
believe both of you at your word that
you're going to make this right. Um as
much as within your power for those
folks in the community. Um but tonight I
can't be supportive.
Nevertheless,
>> council.
>> Well, thank you, chair. Um, thank you,
President Harden, for the work that you
put into this to improve a proposal that
came to us um in a way that as for
mentioned earlier, it was a terrible
proposal initially and not one that I
could support as it was. It relied on
asking taxpayers to pay back a loan to
billionaires and it fa also failed to to
account for the commitments made to the
community.
That breakdown particularly around that
park designed for adaptive to be
adaptive for residents of all abilities
was a failure in coordination and
transparency.
It created confusion.
It eroded trust. And it put this council
in a position of having to fix a
proposal that should have been stronger
before it ever saw the light of day.
I also want to acknowledge the residents
and community leaders
who spoke up. Your advocacy mattered and
it helped lead to a better outcome. And
that's what we did here tonight.
We restructured this deal so that the
general taxpayers are not carrying the
burden. If you do not use uh Scott's
Miracle Growth
uh field, you are not paying for this.
The users of the facility are
contributing through an increased
admissions fee to cover the debt
service. We also secured long-term value
for the city with revenue continuing
after the bonds are paid off. That's 2
and a.5 billion plus per year that the
city can use for whatever it deems
necessary at that time. And importantly,
we've addressed this park not fully, but
it does provide accountability, a public
process, and certainly new private
dollars that not only will an adaptive
park be built, but we secured that $3
million contribution from the ownership
group to help deliver on the commitments
that were already made to this
neighborhood.
So, it is not about writing a blank
check to billionaires. It's about
striking the right deal with private
ownership. It is about embracing women's
sports and making sure Columbus is part
of the future. I believe that the
National Women's Soccer League team
brings new fans, new events, and it does
bring new opportunity to our city. So,
while this was a terrible deal and not
easy, after the changes were made, I do
believe that this is something that I
can support and therefore I'm going to
vote yes.
Thank you. Any other colleagues?
>> Sure.
>> Um I want to start by saying something
that I haven't heard be said by the
administration at all, which is I am
sorry. Um I'm sorry to this community.
I am sorry
>> because what we have seen throughout
this process reflects in my view a lack
of care and consideration for both the
need and the time you all have invested
in imagining what McCoy Park could be.
Um and it should have been honored from
the very beginning.
Our role as council is to serve as the
last line of defense for this community.
And trust requires transparency, honest
answers, and a willingness to
acknowledge when harm has been done.
Of which until council intervene, none
of that was happening. And so I am
sorry.
I am extremely frustrated by this
process.
So much so that my decisions have not
been made literally until today.
This process started long before I
arrived here on council and long before
this community was asked to accept a
deal that now threatens to overshadow
years of vision planning and advocacy.
And when critical information is only
made available through a public hearing
just two weeks before the scheduled time
for a vote, it undermines confidence. I
understand that
this is not how we build trust. It's not
how we govern responsibly. And the
administration should be ashamed of
itself for the blatant disregard of the
people of this community.
I want to thank the community members
that have offered to me information,
have offered to me time, have offered to
me ear.
It absolutely mattered. It was
absolutely considered and how we got
here today.
At the same time, it's not lost on me.
That the Southware corridor of this city
deserves investment that is tangible,
not empty verbal commitments that I have
no choice to believe would not have been
honored but for council's intervention.
And that should concern all of us.
And despite the total ineptitude
displayed during this process,
I have wrestled with this decision.
The opportunity to bring a National
Women's Soccer League team to our city
carries real promise, small business
growth, more than 200 jobs, and a
projected economic impact in the
hundreds of millions of dollars.
Those are not insignificant outcomes.
Columbus can and should be a contender
for trans transformational
opportunities,
but we can't pursue growth at the
expense of community.
We have a responsibility to do both.
And so I want to express my sincere
gratitude to Chair Bankston, to Council
President Harden
for leaning in and ensuring that
residents remained at the center of
these negotiations,
even if it came later than it should
have.
The amendments before us, I believe,
create accountability.
I think they set clear expectations
and I think they ensure the right voices
are at the table. And importantly, they
require meaningful progress on the full
vision of McCoy Park before any public
dollars move forward.
It is important to note that this
legislation carries zero dollars with
it.
There is no fiscal impact at this
moment.
And what would have been a wholesale
ignoring of one of the most underserved
communities in our city can now serve as
an opportunity to rebuild trust. And I
am making a personal commitment to be at
the table with the community to ensure
that the needs of our neighbors are met
should this legislation pass.
The administration will not be able to
steamroll or blindside this council or
this community as we move forward.
There are many additional times that
legislation has to become come back
before this council before this is
final.
And I want to make sure everybody here
understands that if these commitments
are not made, you will not get a vote
for me to allow for the bonds to be sold
to make this deal possible.
>> Thank you, Council Council Member White.
>> Thank you, Chair. And I I'll be brief
because if it had not been for your work
and the work of Council President, I
would not be supporting this. In fact, I
left the hearing thinking we were in a
good position. And then I hear, hey,
there are plans for a park, which thank
you, Director Stevens, for kind of
owning up to that miscommunication
because I was under the impression the
funds were not there. And the only way
in which we were going to have adaptive
sports on that site was to move forward
with this deal. None of us should be
surprised that the community was not
engaged, that council was left in the
dark. that seems to be par for the
course from this administration. If we
did not have requirements in the form of
this amendment that made these neighbors
whole, I would not be supporting this.
This is a
bad circumstance that we have been
thrust upon and now you have the
competing interest of how do you support
economic growth for the city? How do you
support the residents at the same time?
And I honestly feared that the moment
this goes down, what was promised for
this community probably still would not
have happened. This is the only way we
move forward to ensure that residents
will be made whole.
>> Final remarks, Council President.
>> Um I think that the kids are not in the
room any longer. I I let me say that I
have never been so pissed
um
by the position that uh and I'll take
ownership that that that as council
president you guys have my counsel in.
Not you guys, the mayor
has my counsel in. I've never been so
pissed.
And I mean it. I am so pissed.
This this this did not have to be this
way.
I have a message to the mayor. I have a
message to the the business community
who
talks about the Columbus way.
This process bastardized the Columbus
way. You left out the community,
put us our backs up against the wall
>> and say that this is the only way that
we can move forward and have progress.
It's absurd.
It's it's it's it's
I have never been so frustrated and this
is what pisses me off about it is
because we will have to do big things
again business community
and every time you
give people who have actual concerns
this type of example of what you call
the Columbus way. This is not my
Columbus way.
This is not this is not what I am a part
of. This is not this is not how I
operate. This is not how I expect that
the community because this is my
concern. I don't even think that it is
just that
folks are inept. I think that there was
some disrespect
that was given to not bringing everybody
along
that it just and that's the thing I we
still have to be able to do big things
and and this process is a glaring
example
and makes it harder the next time.
And if I did not believe two things, one
that there was another opportunity to
continue to to get this team here, and
two, that even if we voted this thing
down, that a park would be built. I
don't believe that there was not the
resources actually there. There was not
the plan moving forward to stick with
the timeline that Chair Reed talked
about. So, I'm taking a terrible vote to
make sure that we are still able to do a
very big thing like bring women's soccer
to Columbus. And let me just say this on
that piece.
>> I'm talking I'm sorry, ma'am.
I would encourage the community not to
ever again pit one community like women
against a another community like the
southwest side who's also
underserved and say that that is a
choice that we are choosing one or the
other. Don't do that again. That was not
helpful.
>> It was not helpful. It was offensive. We
support young women. We support women.
I'm a yes because
I we have to build this park. There was
a comment. There was a promise made and
a promise broken.
I promise you, Chair Reed,
we will get this park built. We will
stick to the timelines. I will hold them
accountable. And I like what chair what
council member Ross said. This isn't the
only vote. The bonds have to be let on
this thing.
I'm voting yes.
Uh, thank you, Council President. And
with that, I will call for the vote. Um,
I move for passage on ordinance one uh
111, sorry, 1112-2026.
And I move for passage as amended by
voice.
>> Cler, please call the row.
>> Bankston,
>> yes.
>> Barosa de Podia,
>> Deakau,
>> no.
>> Dorren,
>> no.
Green, no.
>> Remy,
>> yes.
>> Ross,
>> yes.
>> W
>> yes.
>> President Harden,
>> yes. The ordinance is passed.
>> Shame.
Shame.
Shame.
>> That's all I have for my committee.
Council President,
>> you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
You're all fraud. You gave away
billionaires.
>> Joe Mattel, get out of here, please.
>> Thank you.
The ownership group is supporting a
Trump acolyte. How can you stand for
that? Hasslam has millions. He doesn't
need more pockets.
>> Are you going to get this containment in
72 hours?
>> No, we're going to keep on going.
>> Just take all our money. We don't need
it.
He doesn't have enough.
>> The next committee to come before
council is the public service and
transportation committee. Committee is
chaired by council member Rosa Deodia.
Councilman, the floor is yours.
>> Thank you, Council President. Tonight we
have one item on second read for public
service and transportation 0820 20226
to appropriate community authority
assessment funds within the Hayden Run
South TIFF fund to transfer community
authority assessment funds from the
Hayden Run South TIFF fund to the Hayden
Run South TIFF capital fund to
appropriate community authority
assessment funds within the Hayden Run
South TIFF Capital Fund to authorize the
city attorney's office real estate
division to contract for professional
services related to the acquisition of
fee simple title and lesser interest in
into property needed for the arterial
street rehabilitation Avery Road project
to authorize the city attorney's office
real estate division to negotiate with
property owners to acquire the
additional rights of way necessary to
complete this project and to authorize
the expenditure of up to $1 million from
the Hayden Run South TIFF capital fund
to authorize a director of public
service or a designate to execute a
construction Yeah, construction contract
or a simple instrument and any
amendments or modifications thereto as
may be necessary with CSX Transportation
Incorporated to facilitate the
construction of the arterial street
rehabilitation Avery Road project. The
city is planning improvements to Avery
Road from Hayden Run Road to Tuttle
Crossing Boulevard. The project includes
reconstruction of over one mile of Avery
Road in addition to other elements like
a new roundabout and shared use path.
This ordinance authorizes the city
attorney to acquire real estate to
facilitate timely completion of the
project. Do my colleagues have any
questions or comments? Seeing none, I
move for passage.
>> Cler, please call the role.
>> Banks Barosa Deodia de AOA Dors Green
Remy Ross Weiss President Harden
>> pass.
>> That's all for me this evening.
>> Thank you chair. Uh, next committee to
come before council is the public safety
and criminal justice committee chair by
council me. Council member, the floor is
yours.
Thank you very much, Council President.
Um, tonight in public safety and
criminal justice, I have three
ordinances for second read. Um, tonight,
or actually, I only have two. I lied. I
have two. Um, we have two different
settlements to consider that originate
out of the Department of Public Safety.
We will hear from that department and
the city attorney's office before I move
for a vote. In a year in which we face
an incredibly tight budget, it is not
lost on me the effects that these
settlements will have on ongoing
operations both in the near future and
as the year goes along. As we learn
more, I want to let my colleagues, city
officials, and members of the audience
and all residents of Columbus know that
we are taking a hard look into the
causes of such settlements and
mitigation opportunities we can take how
to avoid such matters in the future. The
first ordinance is 9872026 to authorize
and direct the city attorney to settle
the lawsuit known as Brook Wilson versus
City of Columbus, case number 222
CV4427 pending in the United States
District Court for the Southern District
of Ohio to authorize the expenditure of
the sum of $750,000 and0 in settlement
of the lawsuit to authorize a transfer
of $750,000 within the general fund and
to declare an emergency. So, I'm going
to go ahead and turn this over to
Melanie Tobias, who is the criminal
division chief for the city attorney's
office to tell us more about this
settlement.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you. Thank you, Chair Remy, uh,
President Harden, council members. We
actually have today to present on this
um, our deputy chief of labor and
employment section in the city
attorney's office, Paul Burnernhard. Um,
he's been, uh, intimately involved with
this litigation for the four years that
it's been going on. Um, so I'd ask him
to come up to the podium um to
share a presentation and he's uh the
best resource to answer any questions
council has on this settlement.
Good evening, Chair Rei, President
Harden, members of council. I have
served as the lead attorney of record
for the city of Columbus on the Brook
Wilson lawsuit since it was filed back
in 2022.
I want to give you a brief overview of
the case and then explain why we believe
it's in the best in the city's best
interest to settle the lawsuit.
Uh by way of background, the plainif in
the case, Brooke Wilson, was a police
sergeant assigned to the to supervise
the accident investigation unit at CPD,
otherwise known as AIU.
And in late May of 2020,
a cadet from the division's cadet
program was assigned to AIOU.
Less than two weeks after that cadet was
assigned to the AIU, the George Floyd
protest broke out in the city of
Columbus.
Sergeant Wilson was part of the city's
all hands-on deck response to that
protest, and he in fact worked the
streets uh during the protests. When
Sergeant Wilson returned to the office,
the cadet asked him, "What is it like or
what was it like working out on the
streets during this time?"
And Sergeant Wilson looked at the cadet
and said, "How would you like it if
somebody called you the N-word?" Except
Sergeant Wilson
didn't say the N word. He actually said
the racial slur.
The cadet was offended by this.
Obviously,
there were no witnesses to the
conversations between Sergeant Wilson
and the cadet. It was her word against
his.
The cadet reported the incident in an
invest and Sergeant Wilson was placed
under investigation.
During the investigation, Sergeant
Wilson requested to take a polygraph
exam which indicated that he was being
when after he took it, the results
showed that he was being deceptive when
he denied using the racial slur to the
cadet.
The investigation resulted in a
sustained finding that Sergeant Wilson
had violated the city's and divisions
EEO policy.
The public safety director, who at the
time was Ned Pettis, suspended
Wilson and did something for the first
time that had been that had been done at
CPD.
Safety Director Pettis demoted Wilson
from police sergeant to police officer.
And that demotion had the effect of
removing Wilson from the accident
investigation unit.
Before he took a new assignment on
patrol, Wilson resigned from the
division and later claimed constructive
discharge.
Although the discipline was ultimately
sustained through arbitration,
Wilson filed this lawsuit alleging race,
age, and sex discrimination
as well as retaliation for him
complaining about being discriminated
against during the investigation.
Fast forward four years, we we were
engaged in litigation for four years
defending this lawsuit, and we were
prepared to try the the case in federal
court.
A week prior to trial, the judge brought
the parties in for a final pre-trial
conference to discuss
the upcoming trial.
And the judge indicated during that
pre-trial conference
that he was going to rule against the
city on a number of evidentiary issues.
Most notably, the judge indicated that
he was not going to allow in the
polygraph exam as evidence at trial.
The judge also indicated that he was not
going to allow the city to present
evidence that Wilson was nearing
retirement and had in fact been
collecting its pension since resigning
back in 2021.
That would have allowed Wilson to claim
lost wages of approximately $2.5 million
at trial.
The city would also have to be would
also have been responsible for Wilson's
attorney's fees. This is the type of
case that the losing party has to pay
the other side's attorney's fees. had
and the city lost at trial, we would
have been responsible for paying not
only the $2.5 million uh to satisfy the
judgment, but also
in excess of $500,000 to his attorneys
for trying the case.
The city also would have u been put in a
bind on the evidentiary on the what we
believe was going to be the evidentiary
ruling on the polygraph exam because
that's why the city did what it did.
Without the polygraph exam, this was a
he said, she said with no witnesses. The
polygraph exam is what tipped the
scales, giving, you know, the city
preponderance of the evidence to take
the actions that it did. It's why we did
what we did. Uh there was also a
comparable in the case. Brooke Wilson
was going to argue that he was treated
less favorably than a female black
lieutenant at the division who also had
EEO charges brought against her.
The difference between those two cases,
according to then safety director
Pettis, was the polygraph exam. So he
wasn't, you know, had that evidentiary
ruling gone as we expected it would
based on the judge's uh presentation to
us,
safety director Pettis would not have
been able to testify why he treated
those two cases differently. It was an
uphill battle to say the least. So
rather than take the chance at trial and
given the financial exposure that the
city faced after conferring with the
safety dire the current safety director
and the administration we made the
decision to negotiate a settlement with
Wilson's attorneys. That's why we are
here asking for $750,000 to affectuate
the settlement of the case. And let me
be clear, it pains me to settle this
case. I wanted to go to trial just like
any trial attorney would would want to
try a case. But given the real
likelihood of losing at trial and then
having to come to this council and ask
for two and a half million to pay the
judgment and another $500,000 plus to
pay the attorney's fees, we were looking
at exposure upwards of $3 million um you
know had this case gone to trial. So
given the that risk, we believe that
it's in the city's best interest to
settle the case at this time.
I'm happy to answer any questions
council has.
>> Yeah, thank you, Paul. Um, I'm going to
go ahead and throw it over to Council
Member Bro, Deputy.
>> Thank you, chair. I have a couple
questions. Um, first question is that I
also, from my understanding, this was
not an isolated incident with this
particular officer and um the tell me
her title again.
>> The cadet.
>> The cadet. this there was there were
other situations that she had
essentially put forward of her
challenges with this particular
gentleman.
>> Yes, council member. Let me speak
briefly to that. The cadet had she was
transferred into AIU in late May of
2020. She had only worked with Sergeant
Wilson for less than two weeks before he
allegedly made this the racial slur to
her. Prior to that, beginning on day one
that this cadet met Sergeant Wilson, uh,
according to her, he made a number of
comments um in her presence that
offended her.
>> Um, you know, she later testified that
it it wasn't the comments themselves or
the nature. It was how he said that and
how he presented them what she referred
to as microaggressions. Uh, there wasn't
one, there was maybe a half dozen that
she that she kept notes of. And when she
did report the racial slur, she also
reported these other microaggressions
that she experienced from Sergeant
Wilson
>> and the two cases that the they
essentially pointed to that in the other
case where the other officer um was not
demoted. What year was that?
>> That was in 2018.
>> 2018. So this was after the this
particular case came up after the
department had started changing their
policies.
>> That's correct. After that previous
case, the city hired created a new
position within public safety to take
EEO investigations out of internal
affairs and brought into uh to public
safety to investigate. This was early
on. It was the first assistant director
of EEO compliance with public safety who
was assigned to investigate
>> who cited on not who cited that there
was wrongdoing but based on the
gentleman.
>> Correct.
>> And the polygraph he asked to take the
poly he volunteered to take the
polygraph. Correct.
>> That's correct. the the contract the the
FOP contract at the time allowed the
focus the subject of the focus of an
investigation to request to take a
polygraph in order to exonerate and
clear themselves. uh that's no longer in
the FOP contract, but it was at the time
and then Sergeant Wilson um did in fact
request to take it
>> because we've used polygraphs
before and one would one might presume
that if the polygraph was in his favor
that he would then use that as a see I
was right. Correct.
>> We're certain of that. And then when you
my last question, when you went to the
judge, can you share with us more about
why the judge would not put the
polygraph in?
>> Uh yes, the the judge flat out said, you
know, polygraphs aren't admissible in
courts, which is true. Generally,
polygraphs are not admissible in
criminal trials uh to use as evidence
against the defendant. He took the
position that why would I allow a
polygraph in this instance? I don't know
that he fully understood the difference
between the contractual requirement or
the contractual allowance of using the
polygraph which in fact the arbitrator
said we could use under the contract
versus the judge's apparent disdain or
disbelief in the use of polygraphs
generally.
>> Would you say that there was another
reason that the judge would have
encouraged us to settle as opposed to
taking us to court?
>> Yes, council member. the judge made a
number of representations at the final
pre-trial conference that uh he did not
think that the city had taken the
correct position in this case.
>> So, I'm just going to I'm not going to
bury the lead here. I'm a no on this
particular case. And I will say that I
understand that we have a stewardship
role here that every dollar that we put
towards a settlement is a dollar that we
take away from housing or we take away
from parks or we take away from anything
else. But what really gets my goat about
this particular case, right, is um
without seeing all of the facts, I am
not an attorney. I was not the judge in
question. But first of all, this is why
it makes it difficult for women to come
forward because microaggressions are so
difficult to to show to prove. I think
it's also difficult to say there. When
you set a precedence, that means someone
is going to be first. you were going to
say you're demoted because you're going
to be the first person demoted because
if the department is doing things
differently then this would be why. But
what really upsets me is that this
particular judge essentially
because he felt like this was a
diversity case or he felt like this did
not fall in line with a particular set
of values or mindset that he has then
essentially he is bullying us into doing
what is not just and that is a challenge
for me because I understand that we have
to move forward with you know making the
best investments here and obviously ly
750,000 is much less than 2 million. But
what this set sends a signal for me and
I don't want to be in the seat to make
this decision is that we are rewarding
somehow bad behavior and we're doing
that with taxpayer dollars. And that's
what this entire case says to me both
with the gentleman in question and also
with this particular judge. And so I
think
at a time when justice is not political,
justice is justice, it is irresponsible
for someone to sit in a seat of power
and not look not look with an eye of
justice, but look through a lens that is
somewhat political or valued or
whatever. And so, you know, I don't know
how the rest of my colleagues feel. I
certainly know that for me I cannot move
this forward. I I I I
first of all all of these settlements
are so challenging for me all the time.
Sometimes I don't feel like they're
enough for the ch for the harm that we
cause. Sometimes I feel like we're
giving someone money just because it is
it is better and it is a fiscal
decision. But this was the one that I
just I I do not like the statement that
it is sending. I'm also not going to be
bullied. Be a federal judge. be a
whatever judge. I'm not going to do
that. So, I'm just letting you know,
chair, and I know we had a convers.
>> That's fair. Council member, uh, council
president,
>> excuse me, sir. I just want to see the
finance chair. Finance, how chair, how
much do we have budgeted for,
uh, settlements this year?
>> Yeah, President Harden, thanks for the
question. We have $6 million budgeted in
2026 for legal settlements.
>> Okay. So, we have $6 million. If this
council takes the city attorney's
recommendation, this take $750,000
out of it. If we don't and we push this
to court,
we could potentially with this just one
case
empty out half of what you budgeted.
>> That's correct, Council President.
>> Okay.
Okay. Okay.
>> Are there any other question? Uh,
Council Member Ross,
>> this is a follow-up question. I
apologize. I may have missed the
specifics on this. The judge is throwing
out the polygraph.
>> Yes, we So, we never actually got a
ruling from the judge. It would have
been coming in the day day or two before
trial. Okay.
>> But he indicated to us he said the words
to the effect of, "I don't want to let
the polygraph in at trial."
>> So,
>> he doesn't want to look at it or there's
a
>> let it in as evidence at trial.
>> Got it. And what was the the pre legal
precedence for
>> not allowing the
>> it was just his general understanding of
criminal law and how polygraph
polygraphs are not permitted in
>> okay
>> in criminal trials
but for some limited circumstances.
>> Okay. And we believe that that was kind
of the lynch pin for being successful in
this case.
>> We did
>> was that piece of evidence?
>> Yes. We believe had had the judge ruled
that we could introduce the polygraph
and the results, we were fully prepared
to try this case.
Any other questions for
Thank you, Paul. Appreciate your your
commitment. Uh I'm now going to ask
Deputy Director George Speaks to talk
about the steps that the Department of
Public Safety have taken to ensure this
type of settlement doesn't happen in the
future.
I think it's better if I give
perspective.
Um, so I've been litigating cases since
the 1980s. I'm the old guy here. Uh, I
can't tell you how many cases that I've
been involved in either as the attorney
or as a client. Um, and I always hearken
back to my favorite professor in law
school. He always told us that
settlements are not about right or
wrong. rather they're designed to reduce
monetary exposure. They're designed to
reduce risk. In other words, settlement
should not be looked at as a as a moral
judgment. Settlement should be looked at
as a financial uh uh judgment. Um so it
quite frankly detests me to recommend
settlement in this case.
Uh nevertheless, it's in the best
economic interest to do so because if we
don't, we are taking a tremendous risk.
That is my perspective.
>> Council member Green.
>> Director, how many There's a lot of I
think I mean I've only been here two
years, but a lot of the settlements that
we've settled, I think many of them were
under public safety. How many um
how many uh cases do we have in court
compared to the amount that we settle in
this way? Do you know or just can you
get give me like some you know a
ballpark figure?
>> So let me talk subjectively and
objectively. Yes. at any one time and
this includes both
HR type cases as the two cases before
you are tonight
>> and inherit and police is use of force
>> um wrongful arrest type cases. So any
one time I would guess around 25 cases
going on at the time. Mhm.
>> So subjectively around 25 or so.
>> Um objectively and the dispatch has done
this in the past. They have looked and
compared similarsized cities to each
other and that actually is very good. Uh
especially in terms of the amount of
judgments we pay out.
>> Um we are a huge organization as I often
tell people. Um you can now add the
public safety forces up in Cleveland and
Cincinnati and they don't equal the size
of Columbus. You could add up to square
miles of Cleveland and Cincinnati. They
don't equal the size of Columbus. We are
a very large entity.
>> Yeah, that was going to be my next
question. Comparison to peer cities. Um
I also think um
well I'll pause there.
>> I do want to go back to you though and
further ask that question. What changes
has the department made to ensure this
type of thing doesn't happen? I don't
understand that question. Um,
>> well, you talk about you still have an
EEO officer within the department.
>> Well, in terms of Oh, in terms of I
thought you meant in a specific case
what we would do to to not come to this
result and and here um we take
um a workplace free discriminatory place
very seriously. We have uh two people
whose sole job it is to uh investigate
these types of cases. In this particular
case, 12 people were interviewed. There
was a lie detector test. And by the way,
one thing that city attorney Barnhart uh
didn't say is that that lie detector
test was asked to be verified. That test
was sent to the Ohio Highway Patrol who
verified that the person um
um was being deceptive in his answer. Um
we have a chain of command investigation
occurred and by a propoundonderance of
the evidence they believed that
uh the discrimination occurred. A
hearing was held before the director by
a propundance of the evidence. He issued
discipline. That case went to an
independent arbitrator. The arbitrator
said, and I actually brought it, quote,
based on the evidence here, the
arbitrator cannot find that the city
aired.
So I think that we acted as we should
have acted. Our problem here is one of
evidence on the eve of trial.
And again, I would go back to uh
settlements are a matter matter of risk
evaluation. Council
member Rosedia,
>> the last thing I'm going to say, I don't
want to belver it. I know it's a long
evening, but I think for me in this
particular in in this particular case,
and I know I'm causing the city attorney
much heartburn in saying this, okay,
because we're going to have to go
between be before this judge again and
they're going to be pissed and they're
going to whatever. That to me is an
abuse of power. For them to say that
this is a diversity case is a problem.
That is a problem. Justice does not see
color. We already know this system is
not set up for people. But when you are
going to go before before you even
present the case, they're already
telling you the key piece of evidence,
which by the way was this gentleman
saying, "Yes, I am so sure I I'm not
lying." When a lie detector that's been
verified has said you are, I bet if we
turn the tables and he came in with
that, it would be a different story. And
I think that's what gets me. And I
agree. I This is why I'm not a lawyer.
Okay? Because because
the the question before me before me
sitting in this seat is I do feel like
it is rewarding bad behavior. I do feel
like this sends a signal to people and
and again,
you know, this could pass and we could
settle this and that's fine. But to not
take this moment to say that this is not
okay, that this is wild. For a judge to
make a decision to essentially bully us
into telling us to take the key piece of
evidence that was volunteered by the
person who brought this case forward is
bananas to me. And maybe it was because
I couldn't talk for the rest of for the
first part of the evening. All this is
coming out now. I just from the first
time that I heard this case, I it just
was difficult for me to say yes to to to
to rewarding this when it is clear that
the person is is wrong.
>> Thank you, Council Member um Council
Member Ross.
Um, was there consideration about an
evidentiary hearing to determine whether
or not like so that the judge could like
make a public decision about this piece
of evidence?
>> Thank you, council member. Uh, it was
before the court on a motion and
lemonade. The
>> a motion. Okay.
>> A motion lemonade. The the pliff had
filed a motion in lemonade asking the
court to explain.
>> Can you just explain for the council
what a motion and lemonade is?
>> Yes. A motion in lemonade is a pre-trial
filing where you're asking the court to
rule on evidentiary issues prior to
trial so that when you go to trial, you
know what you're going to be allowed to
introduce into evidence or and what
you're not. The Wilson's attorneys had
filed a motion with the court asking
that the polygraph exam not be allowed
into evidence at trial. So that's what
that was the procedural posture when we
were at the final pre-trial conference
where the judge uh you know let it be
known that he was not inclined to let
that piece of evidence into trial.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you. Um and I do want to thank
deputy director for going into that a
little bit more. It wasn't um I have
faith in you. we just you you wanted to
illuminate that a little bit more and
what goes on after these things and so
appreciate that um explanation.
Obviously, these things are incredibly
difficult for us and generally there is
situations like this where you know what
the right thing was to do in this thing
but because the risk of losing puts more
taxpay multiplier more amounts of
taxpayer dollars on the line. It really
pains us to pass these things. But
unfortunately the risk is too great. And
so um you know before I was ready to put
this on the agenda I wanted to make sure
we had learned about all the situations
within this we place you know where what
were the safeguards that were put in
place to help ensure things like this
don't happen again. And you know, after
talking with the city attorney's office,
with the department of public safety,
and again, listening to what you said
tonight, you know, I believe the best
path path forward is to vote to settle
this ma matter. Um, I the cost is great
and as we heard tonight, settling these
things is not about right or wrong. It's
about being financially financially
responsible as we evaluate risk. And and
you know, I hear you. I hear my
colleagues. We we talk about this a lot
before these things come up, but it's
more important now than ever that this
council takes the oversight of these
things seriously and start asking
questions. And we've been asking
questions of the department every single
time. Um, I'll turn it back. I don't
know if you had anything further to say,
um, Melanie.
Okay. Okay. With that, I move for
passage by voice.
Cler, please call the role by voice.
>> Bankston.
>> Barrosa Deodia.
>> Deakau.
>> Yes.
>> Dorens.
>> Yes.
>> Green.
>> Yes.
>> Remy.
>> Yes.
>> Ross.
>> Yes.
>> White.
>> Yes.
>> President Harden.
>> Yes.
>> Passed.
>> Thank you, Council President. Next, I
have 1043 2026 to authorize and direct
the city attorney to settle the Ohio
Civil Rights Commission claim known as
Hana O Hassan versus City of Columbus,
charge number C71
013525
0321205
to authorize the expenditure of the sum
of $36,000
in settlement of the claim and to
declare an emergency. I'd like to once
again ask uh Melanie Tobias from the
city attorney's office to tell us more
about this settlement.
>> Thank you, Chair Remy, President Harden,
council members. Um so this litigation
is in a different posture than we
normally see uh coming before council.
This settlement um was arrived at
pre-lawsuit.
Um and so I'll give you some background
on how we arrived there. Um, and because
it's pre-lawsuit, the we're going to
refer to the what we normally say as
plaintiff as the complainant because
there was is not a plaintiff in this
case. that the complainant filed an
allegation with the Ohio Civil Rights
Commission, essentially alleging that in
2024, the Columbus Division of Police
refused to make her an offer of
employment in retaliation for her
complaining about the civilian
polygrapher hired by the Division of
Police to conduct her pre-employment
polygraph test.
The planet had previously unsuccessfully
applied to become um a police officer
with the Columbus Division of Police in
2022 and in 2023.
In 2024, she went through the same
application process as the previous two
years. But after her polygraph test, she
made a formal complaint to CPD and
public safety about the polygrapher,
alleging that he had made inappropriate
comments to her during the polygraph
exam.
uh public safety conducted an immediate
investigation into her claims and
determined that the polygrapher in fact
had performed below the standards
expected of a civilian polygrapher with
the division of police and public
safety. So they uh disciplined uh the
poligrapher entering into a last chance
agreement which is an agreement uh where
the civilian employee um promises not to
uphold all the standards and if they
make any further mistakes no matter how
minor they can be terminated and they
don't have the right to go through
arbitration or to contest that
termination. And in addition to doing
that um CPD offered the complainant a
new polygraph test. uh she submitted to
that and agreed to do that. Um as in
2022 and 2023, the division of police
ultimately did not end up offering her a
spot at the police academy.
She then filed a complaint with the Ohio
Civil Rights Commission after that um
lack of an offer to her. Uh after an
investigation, the Civil Rights
Commission found no probable cause and
issued the complainant a right to sue
letter. She had to go through this
process first with the Civil Rights
Commission before she was going to be
allowed to proceed forward with a
lawsuit. She was represented by council
and it appeared to the city attorney's
office that it was clear that they were
going to um go forward with litigation
and file a lawsuit. So, it's that point
um that we entered into negotiations
with a complainant. I think it's
important to highlight for council that
a finding of no probable cause by the
Civil Rights Commission doesn't hold any
um standing in subsequent litigation.
It's not a bar to her filing a lawsuit.
It's not a defense that we can put
forward to defend the city that the
Civil Rights Commission made this
finding. It's just a process that an
individual is required to go through
first before filing litigation.
Um, so during uh
uh during these negotiations with the
complainant, uh we arrived at this
amount of $36,000 that we're
recommending council approve to settle
this matter. Um deciding to settle a
matter presuit when a lawsuit appears
imminent avoids the costs that are
incurred and even successful litigation.
So a successful summary judgement motion
on our part for example would still
incur direct costs for depositions and
experts. Once a lawsuit is filed, the
types of claims involved in this matter,
this retaliation claim and harassment
claims um we get to the fees shifting
position which we saw in the previous
case council just cons uh considered.
That's when attorney's fees start to
run. Um, so these are all things that
are that we bring into consideration
when we're determining whether or not um
a settlement is possible. A possibility
for a low settlement is much easier at
the very beginning of litigation when
those attorneys fees aren't starting to
build and build and build. Um, while the
city was confident in its case in this
matter, um, it's not completely without
risk were we to go forward um, and
defend an actual lawsuit being filed by
the complainant. And so in order to
again as we are learning more all the
time as these settlements come in front
of the the council judges have a lot of
discretion once a case is filed and it
goes into court we lose a lot of
control. Um and so the city attorney's
office believes that the settling this
matter for $36,000
um takes into consideration exposure
that we would have if the lawsuit had
been filed and we went forward with
that.
>> Thank you very much. Council member
Ross,
>> I'm just presuming it's because we had
already made a determination that that
officer had at least had at least broken
some of our internal rules.
>> Are you are you asking why an offer of
employment wasn't made to the to the
officer? Yeah.
>> Even though there was a a no probable
cause determination by the the admin
side of things, we had already kind of
gone through investigation on our end to
determine that.
>> Correct. Correct. We looked into her
immediate complaints. The public safety
and CPD looked into her immediate
complaint about the polygraphers's
behavior and immediately addressed that.
And I believe assistant director speaks
um can comment on, you know, how that's
handled within CPD and public safety. Um
but with respect to the allegation that
she was retaliated against because she
complained about the polygrapher, no the
investigation, we did not believe that
the city there was no admission that
there was any wrongdoing uh on on the
part of the city in this matter.
>> Okay. Director, is it right to assume
that you were balancing both of those?
>> Yes. So, council mayor, let me point out
the stark contrast with the last case.
So the last case, $750,000 of which over
500,000 of that was attorney fees.
>> That was that case was settled on the
eve of trial. Here you have a case
hasn't been filed yet in court, although
the Ohio Civil Rights Commission found
in favor of the city. So once again,
this is risk management. We're trying to
cut off those attorney fees quickly um
and trying to nip this case in the butt,
if you will, for as low amount as
possible to protect the city.
>> A very stark contrast of two cases.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you, Deputy Director. Any other
comments? Oh, I'm sorry, Council
President. Yeah, I'm hearkening back to
what I had brought up the last time
because uh
we're we're pretty early into this
budget
and
um uh we are spending down our
settlements pretty quickly. Let me ask
the question a little differently.
How do we back our way in as we decide
what to settle now or not with the risk
back and forth of knowing that we
have set aside only $6 million? Like is
the is the department and city attorney
taking that into consideration? Should
that be a consideration that council
takes into consideration? Should we ask
for? Well, I guess when we do have the
committee to come together, we'll talk
about how we plan to
>> because so who should be making this who
should be thinking about this as
grown-ups.
>> President Harden, in terms of timing,
when one files a lawsuit, you get a case
schedule.
Everything is laid out in the case
schedule. So, for example, settlement
conferences, trials, uh we can't dictate
that. Um it's determined by the court.
And so, uh,
there's no way we can say we're only
going, we're not going to settle this
judge. We're not going to offer any
money or a judge, we lose at trial, we
owe something. There's no way of saying
sorry, we're not paying that. Um, it's
not within our power as a party in a
case.
>> Okay. I mean, I'm just trying to bring
focus to where where it looks like we're
barreling towards a pretty big issue. Uh
where we might have more settlements
coming than we have dollars set aside
for. I'm just trying to make sure that
we are in the open talking about how we
are going to rectify this as we all have
to start making very grownup uh fiscal
uh decisions that impact
other departments. Tripoli. I think that
that's probably the real conversation
that is going to happen. But thank you.
Thank you, chair. Thanks. Any other
questions or comments?
Obviously, similar to the previous
legislation, you know, again, these
things are tough votes for us, but I
believe based on the information
presented that it's in the best
financial interest of the city to move
forward. So, if there are no further
questions for my comments, I move for
passage.
>> Second.
Bankston Barroso de Padilla de Akawa
Dorren Green Remy Ross Wish President
Harden
>> passed.
>> Thank you very much council president.
That is all I have this evening.
>> Thank you Mr. Chair.
The final committee to come before
council is the public utilities and
sustainability committee. That committee
is chaired by speedreader council member
Wish. The floor is yours sir.
>> Thank you council president. I think I'm
insulted that the audience cleared out
and we just got to public utilities. Um,
tonight first in public utilities and
sustainability, I have ordinance
0596-2026
to authorize the director of the
department of public utilities to enter
into an indef indefinite quantity
agreement with PTOIC electrical service
LLC for electrical transformer and
switch gear inspection, maintenance, and
repair services to authorize the
expenditure of 170,000 split between the
water and sanitary sewer operating funds
and to wave competitive bidding
provisions of Columbus City Code. This
contract will provide planned
inspections, testing, maintenance, and
repair services to equipment at Columbus
Water and Power Plants, ensuring that
all components are operating correctly
and at the and that the department can
continue to provide uninterrupted
service to the Columbus community. Let
me stop there. See if any questions or
comments from my colleagues. Seeing
none, I move for passage.
>> Please call the role.
>> Banks Rosa Deia de Aard Green Remy Ross
Vice President Harden.
>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance
0868-2026
to authorize the director of the
Department of Public Utilities to enter
into a service contract with KNS
services for the watershed camera
improvements project to wave the formal
bidding requirements of Columbus City
Code to authorize an amendment to the
2025 capital improvement budget to
authorize a transfer funds in
appropriation within the water bond fund
and to authorize the expenditure of up
to $249,34943
for the project. This ordinance provides
for the replacement of the entire
existing camera system at Hoover Dam,
which is a crucial tool for maintaining
awareness of the dam and its surrounding
environment. Let me stop there, see if
any questions or comments from my
colleagues. Seeing none, I move for
passage.
>> Thanks, Denver. Rosa, de a Dorren Green,
Remy Ross, Vice President Harden.
>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance
0873-2026
to authorize the director of the
Department of Public Utilities to enter
into a construction contract with
General Maintenance and Engineering
Company for the Parsons Avenue water
plant roof renovations part 2 project to
authorize an amendment to the 2025
capital improvement budget to
appropriate funds within the water
freshwater market rate fund to make this
ordinance contingent upon the Ohio Water
Development Authority approving a loan
for this project to authorize the
expenditure of up to $2,344,250
from the water freshwater market rate
fund to pay for the project and to
authorize the expenditure of up to
$2,000 from the water bond fund to pay
for prevailing wage services. This
project involves necessary and extensive
roof repairs to a number of buildings at
the Parsons Avenue water plant that will
pre preserve the structural integrity of
the buildings, prevent damage to
interior spaces, and ensure the
operations of the water plant continues
un uninterrupted. Let me stop there. See
if any questions or comments from my
colleagues. Seeing none, I move for
passage.
>> Please call the role. Banks timber roso
de padia de aar dors green remy ros vice
president Harden
>> thank you next I have ordinance
0874-2026
to authorize the director of the
department of public utilities to enter
into a construction contract with clear
creek codings ltd for the 710 east tank
painting Improvements project to
authorize an amendment to the 2025
capital improvement budget to authorize
a transfer of cash and appropriation
between projects within the water bond
fund and to authorize an expenditure of
up to 1 mill6 $614,938.50
for the project from the water bond
fund. This project includes the recoding
of one of the division of water's 2
milliongal water storage tanks as well
as the addition of various safety
improvements to prolong its useful
service life. Let me stop there see if
any questions or comments from my
colleagues. Seeing none, I move for
passage
a dor screen Ross vice president Harden.
>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance
0887-2026
to authorize the director of the
Department of Public Utilities to enter
into a construction contract with JLD
Construction Services LLC for the
Carrier
Court Storm Water Improvements Project
to authorize an amendment to the 2025
capital improvement budget to
appropriate funds within the Water
Development Authority Storm Sewers Fund
to authorize a transfer transfer of cash
appropriation between projects within
the Storm Sewer Bond Fund. to make this
ordinance contingent upon the Ohio Water
Development Authority approving a loan
for this project and to authorize the
expenditure of up to 2,567,52266
from the Ohio Water Development
Authority storm sewers fund and from the
storm sewer bond fund to pay for the
project. This project involves
improvements to an existing storm water
drainage basin in the Westland community
as well as the replacement of
inadequately sized storm sewers
downstream of the basin. Let me stop
there. See if any questions or comments
for my colleagues.
>> Seeing none, I move for passage.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks Barrosa de Padilla de Akaw Dors
Green Reie Ross Vice President Harden
>> pass.
>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance 0920
uh-20226
to authorize the director of the
department of finance and management to
associate all general budget
reservations resulting from this
ordinance with the appropriate universal
term contract purchase agreements for
the purchases of five dump trucks for
the department of public utilities from
VA Freightlininer Columbus Incorporated
and to authorize the admin the
expenditure of 1,219,05
to4 from within the water operating
fund.
Uh these dump trucks will be used to
transport excavating equipment as well
as uh haul materials such as dirt,
gravel, and sold to and from job sites.
Let me stop there. See if any questions
or comments from my colleagues. Seeing
none, I move for passage.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Banks Rosa Podia de Akawa, Dorance
Green, Remy Ross, Swice, President
Harden.
>> Passed.
>> Thank you. Next, I have ordinance
0935-2026
to authorize the director of the
Department of Public Utilities to enter
into a contract renewal with the writer
company Incorporated for specialty
maintenance craft services to authorize
the expenditure of up to 1,520,000
from the electricity water sewage
operating fund and to declare an
emergency. Uh the work to be completed
under this contract includes the
cleaning, repair, maintenance, and
replacement of minor equipment at
various Columbus water and power
facilities. Emergency designation is
requested as the current contract will
expire on April 22nd, 2026. And it is
best to renew it before these uh
necessary services are disrupted. Let me
stop there. See if any questions or
comments from my colleagues. Seeing
none, I move for passage.
>> Clerk, please call the role.
>> Thanks. Deborrosa de Padilla de Akawa,
Dorance Green, Remy Ross, Vice President
Harton.
>> Passed. Thank you. Last, I have
ordinance 0936-2026
to authorize director of the Department
of Public Utilities, Columbus Water and
Power to modify a contract with Senegro
Central LLC for the
water treatment residuals turnkey
dewatering services project for the
division of water and to authorize an
expenditure of 12,400,000 from the water
operating fund. This contract provides
management services for water treatment
residuals stored at the McKinley Avenue
Corey. This includes services such as
the dewatering, processing, and
utilization of water treatment residuals
produced at all three of the city's
water plants. Let me stop there. See if
any questions or comments from my
colleagues. Seeing none, I move for
passage.
>> Please call the role.
>> Banks de Aoris Green Reie Ross Vice
President Harden
>> passed.
Thank you, council president. I would
hope that in the future I could go
first. That way I don't have to do this
so quickly.
>> I don't think that's how it works, sir.
>> But I that is all I have for my
committee this evening.
>> Good job.
>> If if there's no further business
accompanying for council, is there a
motion to adjourn?
>> Cler, please call the row.
>> Thanks, Denver Rosia de Aar. Dorren
Green, Remy W Remy Ross, Vice President
Hart.
>> Meeting is adjourned. Have a good
evening.
No segments match your search.